My guess would be a New Election will be SCOTUS decision RE: 2020.
(media.greatawakening.win)
Comments (15)
sorted by:
If that's the solution, then it should be with paper ballots, voter ID, and purple thumbs once you've voted. And with the military overseeing all the voting and counting of ballots.
Guarded by the military. It is the only way.
It is simple. Everyone knows where they cheated and In what states and cities. This was a Federal election and the states (AZ. PA. MICH. GA. NY and CAL.) that had Obvious Fake ballots by the thousands, should be Thrown OUT. What is left is a 70% Trump win.
Oh, I agree, was just posting my guess...
Cheating was rampant in every state, has been for generations. Many in Congress there from fraud, maybe most of them. Reagan was the last President before Trump to win legit.
I am not so sure Trump won legitimately either, but I feel it had to be that way for people to see how great America could be again. So when Biden and the commies took over we would have a comparison. Just my thought, as Hillary did win the popular vote, just didn't get the Electoral College numbers she needed. That was fixed for Biden.
No we need 1 day election on paper ballots. There has been too much cheating with mail in ballots.
Love hopium hits but military is the only way.
If the court rules in favor of the plaintiff's, effectively, we won't have a sitting government. This may be where the military steps in. Also, the military will be needed to run/oversee new elections.
I like it and will remain hopeful.
This is my thought too, which helps explain why Trump kept doing rallies.
Don’t they have to agree to hear a case first? As I recall they had several opportunities but passed.
Those opportunities were either brought by states (no standing), or were partisan (they are not going to go there, because it will open the door for any party to go after the oposition). This Brunson case is an individual bringing a case against individuals (congressmen etc. from both sides of the aisle), concerning their constitutionally demanded oath of office. Yes, the SC wants to reinforce the constitution.
Of course, we shall see, and a conference is not necessarily ONLY as step towards the next hearing.
The trouble is that courts move so slowly that often the eventual rulings are a day late and a dollar short.
The rule of law grinds exceedingly slow, but cannot be refuted.
They have something coming out Jan 6th.