Did you notice the strike in the word "lawyer"? I said "legal mind". The brothers themselves seem to be brilliant 'legal minds'. And they're not lawyers. No?
Maybe in a world of telepathy that would work. In the real world, cases depend on the clarity (and truthfulness) of their presentation before a jury or a judge. If you have a babbling idiot present the case, be prepared to lose. Every trial is an educational experience---for everyone.
This idea that you need good lawyers to win -- WOW -- what corruption! What an absurd idea!
Cases should be tried on their merits, and the skill of the lawyers should contribute NOTHING to its success or failure.
At best, lawyers should be treated like accountants.
The idea that lawyers can string together a magical string of words that can change reality is nothing short of sorcery!
Did you notice the strike in the word "
lawyer"? I said "legal mind". The brothers themselves seem to be brilliant 'legal minds'. And they're not lawyers. No?Again, it shouldn't have anything to do with brilliance.
Even a retarded person should be able to get justice in a fair justice system.
Let's hope this "retarded person" is helpful in drafting up the additional information SCOTUS requested.
From Socrates' lips to our ears. End the sophistry. Bar the Bar.
Henry VI, Part 2, Act IV, Scene 2.
Maybe in a world of telepathy that would work. In the real world, cases depend on the clarity (and truthfulness) of their presentation before a jury or a judge. If you have a babbling idiot present the case, be prepared to lose. Every trial is an educational experience---for everyone.