The conversation is in relation to Twitter doing something, or nothing, about child exploitation. Learn to follow a fucking conversation... They're clearly talking about enforcement.
This doesn't mean anything other than that... It doesn't absolve anyone of anything...
you are totally illogical, Everything you just said is an emotional lie and fallacy. Apparently you have little reading comprehension skill. I would try to explain this further but doubt you have the capacity to learn. oh what the hell, All Donny said wat the tile of the OP is inaccurate, for you to accuse him of supporting Twitters inaction on child traffiking is total insanity on your part. Donny said NO such thing.
Learn: Logic, critical analysis, and reading comprehension. Good luck
When does it come out that the reason they weren't shutting down the child exploitation material is that somehow Twitter was making big $$$ off of this stuff? That's what I want to see. Was Twitter making off-the-books $$$ from child exploitation? The fact that Podesta's niece was in Truth & Safety (another satanic reversal there, I'd say) at Twitter makes me think that there is high probability that this is exactly what was happening.
OP is engaging in MSM style right-think. Telling you WHAT to think about something before you actually read it, even though the statement doesn't support the interpretation. This is EXACTLY the tactic MSM headlines did with Trump for 6 years. SMDH.
That's not what he's saying.
He's claiming it's false that they "refused to take action"
Are you fucking serious? FFS
The conversation is in relation to Twitter doing something, or nothing, about child exploitation. Learn to follow a fucking conversation... They're clearly talking about enforcement.
This doesn't mean anything other than that... It doesn't absolve anyone of anything...
you are totally illogical, Everything you just said is an emotional lie and fallacy. Apparently you have little reading comprehension skill. I would try to explain this further but doubt you have the capacity to learn. oh what the hell, All Donny said wat the tile of the OP is inaccurate, for you to accuse him of supporting Twitters inaction on child traffiking is total insanity on your part. Donny said NO such thing.
Learn: Logic, critical analysis, and reading comprehension. Good luck
Could be. But it's certainly ambiguous.
Musk's reply confirms that is what they're talking about.
When does it come out that the reason they weren't shutting down the child exploitation material is that somehow Twitter was making big $$$ off of this stuff? That's what I want to see. Was Twitter making off-the-books $$$ from child exploitation? The fact that Podesta's niece was in Truth & Safety (another satanic reversal there, I'd say) at Twitter makes me think that there is high probability that this is exactly what was happening.
Ya know I am really liking elon, I would love to meet the man and have a chat.
Twitter was a den of perverts before he started cleaning the place up and firing all the degenerate liberals.
The "it inadvertently skipped our attention" no longer flies. Elon satisfied himself that it was intentional and addressed it. End of story...
OP is engaging in MSM style right-think. Telling you WHAT to think about something before you actually read it, even though the statement doesn't support the interpretation. This is EXACTLY the tactic MSM headlines did with Trump for 6 years. SMDH.