What is this thread all about?
Just a place for general discussion. A place to unload whats on your mind and talk about anything - personal, health, help needed, achievements, daily highs and daily lows, theories, predictions and what have you.
Does not need to be Q related.
The Brunson case has been proffered to the SC, but last I heard, it has not been accepted (yet).
I personally don't think it will amount to much, if anything. If the SC had been positioned to uphold their oaths..... then....
But we'll see. I think there have been SOME posts and discussion on the topic, but I suspect that collectively, most think/feel its not the big deal that some think it is...
But if the SC was not going to accept it, why did they push it ? They are treating this case like no other. They wield the sword of Damocles over Congress. I think it will come to a head during this lame duck Congress. They can hear it at any time they want, and they are waiting for something to happen. Probably Trump's arrest.
PS. The case has been docketed and will be distributed for conference on Jan 6. This means, that on Jan 6 the court will discuss in private whether the case merits going forward to a hearing, or whether the court will simply decline to hear it.
If they ACCEPT to hear it, that would be a big deal. But that is a HUGE if.
From the Brunson's own website.
About SC distributing cases for conference:
https://www.supremecourt.gov/casedistribution/casedistributionschedule.aspx
The actual court docket:
https://www.supremecourt.gov/search.aspx?filename=/docket/docketfiles/html/public/22-380.html
Um, this is ambiguous. Who is "they" here?
Cases can be docketed with the SC which means they are on a list for the SC to look at and decide whether or not they will hear the case. As far as I know, there has been no decision on that point yet, but maybe I'm wrong. The point, however, is that getting on the docket does not mean that the SC will hear the case. It's just a first step necessary for them to consider whether or not they will hear it.
The SC did not "push" this case in any way, did they? Or are you saying they delayed making a determination on whether they will hear it or not?
Either way, I am simply offering a response to why perhaps the frens on the board are not making as big a deal of this as you seem to think is warranted.
Loy Brunson said that the Clerk of the Supreme Court contacted them and gave them pointers on how to amend the case to make it more likely to succeed and asked them to speed up the process.
He explains it in this video; https://rumble.com/v1xi6vh-juan-o-savin-112722-video-b.html
Yes, I know that. And that's an encouraging sign, for sure.
But, it's on the docket. And the Clerk is not the Justices. We have to wait until Jan 6 to find out whether this will truly go ahead, or simply be set aside.
(I listened to the video all the way through 2 weeks ago.)