ridiculous. I could maybe see one ore two years around the age of eighteen in some special circumstances... but even 14 to eighteen is way out of whack!
I see your position... but I think the legislators have perhaps allowed too much discretion in this case... I mean ten years makes it OK for biden to sleep with his kids babysitter!
If its the same bill, I belive it was written that if the 2 persons were separated by 8 years or less. Which would also make it legal for an 18yr old to have sex with a 10yr old.
Not sure if the age gap was 8 or 10 years. But yeah it was very real. Was on the news in Cali.
To determine if it's accurate or not, the logical thing to do would be to look up California Senate Bill (That's what SB stands for) 145. SB-145. He's put it right there in his post. Look it up, read the bill and see if it was passed by both houses and signed into law by the governor.
There is some misconceptions on this. The above post is incorrect.
It only applies to children ages 14,15,16,17. Not for anyone under 14 years of age.
And, it is still illegal and not OK to have underage sexual activity, it is mainly to address whether the perpetrator should be classified as a sex offender or not, allowing exceptions for cases such as an 18 yr old with a 17 yr old significant other.
The bill essentially codifies the discretion a judge has on requiring registration as a sex offender. It does not legalize the action itself.
I understand the outrage, and its a wide-berth, but its a bit sensationalized.
ridiculous. I could maybe see one ore two years around the age of eighteen in some special circumstances... but even 14 to eighteen is way out of whack!
I agree.
Misuse of the discretion should cost a judge the election/appointment, and an argument against giving them such a wide range is certainly justified.
I'm just pointing out that this is materially different than 'legalization of pedophilia'
I see your position... but I think the legislators have perhaps allowed too much discretion in this case... I mean ten years makes it OK for biden to sleep with his kids babysitter!
There's definitely a case that this is normalizing pedophilia!
If its the same bill, I belive it was written that if the 2 persons were separated by 8 years or less. Which would also make it legal for an 18yr old to have sex with a 10yr old.
Not sure if the age gap was 8 or 10 years. But yeah it was very real. Was on the news in Cali.
To determine if it's accurate or not, the logical thing to do would be to look up California Senate Bill (That's what SB stands for) 145. SB-145. He's put it right there in his post. Look it up, read the bill and see if it was passed by both houses and signed into law by the governor.
I know I tried to do this but no official gov sote if that's available (Aussie here) and all I could find was 2020 news
Here you go: https://sd11.senate.ca.gov/sb145
Sick fucks
Sauce: https://truthsocial.com/users/THEPATRIOTPARTY/statuses/109500979051351882
There is some misconceptions on this. The above post is incorrect.
It only applies to children ages 14,15,16,17. Not for anyone under 14 years of age.
And, it is still illegal and not OK to have underage sexual activity, it is mainly to address whether the perpetrator should be classified as a sex offender or not, allowing exceptions for cases such as an 18 yr old with a 17 yr old significant other.
There is a clear definition at this website: https://sd11.senate.ca.gov/sb145