The whole "there is no Qanon there is Q and anons" still makes zero sense to me. Q is anonymous. He is an anon who calls himself Q. I am an anon who calls myself HelloDolly. Not sure why this whole "there is no such thing as Qanon" is perceived as such a "gotcha." In the scheme of things to me it is the least important thing in the wide world. PS: Isn't Qanon.pub a website set up way back when, by someone who was decidedly NOT MSM?
The reason it makes sense to me is because Q talks about it in his posts. He points out that he was only ever known as "Q", and the reason the media calls it "QAnon" is so that they can include "anons" as part of "Q" so that they can have a fake anon go and shoot up a pizza parlor so that the whole thing can be made all about him instead of the content of what Q actually had to say. It just makes it easier for the media to insert actors and use that mechanism to discredit the entire movement into a bunch of wacky conspiracy theories.
they can have a fake anon go and shoot up a pizza parlor so that the whole thing can be made all about him instead of the content of what Q actually had to say
I'm confused...does "anon" just mean "people" in this context?
Isn't this all sort of a "no true scotsman" fallacy
Not sure why this whole "there is no such thing as Qanon" is perceived as such a "gotcha."
People are free to their opinions, yet I agree it weakens one's position by being overly pedantic. I think it fits with the autistic slant of the community though. Doesn't really matter to me. shrug
Kek , sorry to send twice. It appeared to me that only a couple anons in this thread are aware that q made a drop detailing an enemy technique to try and hold Q accountable for anon theories. And of course, the enemy uses FF attacks to avoid Q drops altogether by blaming anons for violence.
The whole "there is no Qanon there is Q and anons" still makes zero sense to me. Q is anonymous. He is an anon who calls himself Q. I am an anon who calls myself HelloDolly. Not sure why this whole "there is no such thing as Qanon" is perceived as such a "gotcha." In the scheme of things to me it is the least important thing in the wide world. PS: Isn't Qanon.pub a website set up way back when, by someone who was decidedly NOT MSM?
The reason it makes sense to me is because Q talks about it in his posts. He points out that he was only ever known as "Q", and the reason the media calls it "QAnon" is so that they can include "anons" as part of "Q" so that they can have a fake anon go and shoot up a pizza parlor so that the whole thing can be made all about him instead of the content of what Q actually had to say. It just makes it easier for the media to insert actors and use that mechanism to discredit the entire movement into a bunch of wacky conspiracy theories.
I'm confused...does "anon" just mean "people" in this context?
Isn't this all sort of a "no true scotsman" fallacy
To help make sense of it - u/#q4881
People are free to their opinions, yet I agree it weakens one's position by being overly pedantic. I think it fits with the autistic slant of the community though. Doesn't really matter to me. shrug
This drop exists as a fact, tho - u/#q4881
Yep, fair point. Thanks for the source.
Woah you really love posting this
Kek , sorry to send twice. It appeared to me that only a couple anons in this thread are aware that q made a drop detailing an enemy technique to try and hold Q accountable for anon theories. And of course, the enemy uses FF attacks to avoid Q drops altogether by blaming anons for violence.
Same. It always struck me as "meh". I guess the point I can somewhat understand is that it distracts from Q posts vs the followers.
More than a distraction - u/#q4881