What have we seen with since COVID?
We all discovered the WEF World Economic Forum, and Event 201
And we all could pick Klaus Schwab out of a police line-up.
We all know who Dr Anthony Fauci is, and how he will change his story.
And we all know all about his funding "gain of function" research in Wuhan and Ukraine
We all have learned that COVID vaccines cause "SADS", and SIDS...
We saw New York send COVID infected people into nursing homes, to kill off the residents.
We have seen that the US government is suspiciously slow to react to COVID vaccine safety signals coming out of VAERS and elsewhere.
We have all seen how the media will promote these vaccines, 24/7/365
We have seen how schools, colleges, universities will force these vaccines on people.
We have seen how the US armed forces will force these vaccines on people
We have all seen how the President of the United States will use OSHA to force these vaccines on people.
How many pillars of society came together, to push these vaccines on you?
And we can all see, plain as day, that these vaccines are poison, and that they cause irreparable harm to the body.
And yet, some people still say "TRUST THE SCIENCE" ?
And this puts a lot of people in a strange predicament where, for the first time in their lives, they doubt the science...
I believe that "science" is a man-made belief system, that was made to replace religion.
That is why The Holy Bible has been taken out of schools,
And today schools are more "science based"
And yet, what is the product of these "science" based schools?
Generation after Generation of decline.
We live in Clown World.
HONK HONK!!
I sincerely believe that the intended end product of school is a person who very stupid, and yet believes themselves to be very smart.
"liberal education"
a BIG part of the GREAT AWAKENING is to turn away from the man-made religion of "science",
and turn toward GOD.
to embrace the scientific method,
instead of "trusting the science"
just the idea of a "religious exemption" ought to give us a big clue as to the nature of the battle we are in.
the idea, that we submit to someone else,
the idea, that we subject our religious beliefs, to the scrutiny of a heathen mob?
the idea, that someone who doesn't share my beliefs, is fit to judge my beliefs?
because surely anyone who shared my beliefs, would not be putting themselves in any position to be denying me my rights.
tomorrow's headlines, in the mainstream media hate machine
Q ANONS GO FULL ANTI-SCIENCE, DEMAND THE SCIENTIFIC METHOD BE ADHERED TO
My view, as a scientist, is that MAN, as created by God, has only been on Earth for the ~6,000 years of record. I am still undecided on the ultimate age of the Earth. I don't buy that the earth is billions of years old because the Earth's core is still molten, and since there is no internal source of heat on Earth, this heat can only be explained by being there from initial planet formation (any radioactive heating, which used to be used to explain the geothermal gradient, and hot core, only occurs in crustal rocks, due to radioactive isotopes only associated with the minerals in continental crust) But whether the Earth is 6, 000 years old, or 6 million, it wasn't enough time for all the varieties of life on Earth to "evolve". (even six billion years is not enough time, since evolution, to the extent seen on Earth, is impossible)
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Spent_nuclear_fuel
You're also talking about enough gravity to hold the planet together, and us to the surface. That much compression produces heat.
Also this: https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Flashover
But the heat from the pressure would be dissipated. There is no continuous source of heat for the Earth's interior, especially at the temperatures of molten rock.
Where would the heat go? There's no heat sink like we know it, and we have the atmosphere. And yeah, nobody has dug very deep before, but we have the crust, mantle, outer core and inner core. Where does the lava come from? Why do we have earthquakes?
Heat does dissipate from an object even as large as Earth. Some scientist in the 1800s did a "black body radiation" analysis of Earth and theorized that the Earth was about 6,000 years old. When I was in geology classes in the 1970's, they discounted this by saying, "but scientists in the 1800s didn't know about radioactive elements and the heat generated by decay". There are radioactive elements in minerals of the Earth's continental crust, but not in the ocean crust and the rest of the Earth's interior. The small amount of heat associated with that decay in the crustal rocks can't account for the heat of the deep Earth. I believe the most logical explanation is that the molten interior of the Earth is still molten because it hasn't had time to cool.
I work it in reverse chronological order. We know that Jesus was born about 2000 years ago, because we're still counting the years since that event.
Jesus was crucified and resurrected. That's a supernatural event. There's no way the Roman military failed in killing a man in their custody. The event was so profound that it turned Jesus' disciples from cowardice to bold martyrs. Jesus' worldly adversaries had every reason to disprove the resurrection, but they could not. All it would have taken was to show the dead body. And upon burial, his dead body was guarded by Roman soldiers, who would have been executed themselves if they left their post. For me, all of these things confirm the resurrection.
If Jesus was able to resurrect himself from death, he was God incarnate, and that validates the Old Testament of the Bible.
If God supernaturally created man, I have no reason to doubt his explanation for supernaturally creating the Earth and the universe in creation week.
I believe God could have done everything in a literal seven days, but there weren't even "days" until, what, the third day of creation? Time is irrelevant to God, so whether it was a day or a million years is all the same to Him.