Double negative or not, there was no misleading going on; it's literally the FDA's purpose for this, and they don't get to wriggle out of the accountability.
When oversight fails, oversight is what gets in trouble.
Hard to be misled when you aren't even looking where you are going. At that point it's your own damn fault. It's like jumping in the trunk of a car that is owned by a mobster and then acting surprised you're about to be dumped in the damn river. They were NEVER given proof it was safe or effective, and, like you said, they said, "Looks good!"
These people in our institutions - you think they choose to be wilfully ignorant or are they actually at stupid or willing conspirators? Or some combination there of? Can never really make up my mind.
Double negative or not, there was no misleading going on; it's literally the FDA's purpose for this, and they don't get to wriggle out of the accountability.
When oversight fails, oversight is what gets in trouble.
They were not misled, at all. They simply never gave any proof it was safe or effective, and the FDA said, "Looks good!"
Multiple times!
60+ "looks good!"
18+ "looks good!"
12+ "looks good!"
6+ "looks good!"
Like come on, who COULD believe that they were "misled"
Hard to be misled when you aren't even looking where you are going. At that point it's your own damn fault. It's like jumping in the trunk of a car that is owned by a mobster and then acting surprised you're about to be dumped in the damn river. They were NEVER given proof it was safe or effective, and, like you said, they said, "Looks good!"
Troof dat.
These people in our institutions - you think they choose to be wilfully ignorant or are they actually at stupid or willing conspirators? Or some combination there of? Can never really make up my mind.
The ones who actually took the clot shots are useful idiots.
Yes, but oversight did fail as a result to do due diligence and protect people.
They failed successfully for their agenda if you will