Win / GreatAwakening
GreatAwakening
Communities Topics Log In Sign Up
Sign In
Hot
All Posts
Settings
All
Profile
Saved
Upvoted
Hidden
Messages

Your Communities

General
AskWin
Funny
Technology
Animals
Sports
Gaming
DIY
Health
Positive
Privacy
News
Changelogs

More Communities

frenworld
OhTwitter
MillionDollarExtreme
NoNewNormal
Ladies
Conspiracies
GreatAwakening
IP2Always
GameDev
ParallelSociety
Privacy Policy
Terms of Service
Content Policy
DEFAULT COMMUNITIES • All General AskWin Funny Technology Animals Sports Gaming DIY Health Positive Privacy
GreatAwakening Where We Go Qne, We Go All!
hot new rising top

Sign In or Create an Account

397
Trumps response to January 6th Committee!!🔥🔥 (media.greatawakening.win)
posted 3 years ago by Oldpatriot 3 years ago by Oldpatriot +397 / -0
36 comments download share
36 comments share download save hide report block hide replies
Comments (36)
sorted by:
▲ 25 ▼
– Oblakhan 25 points 3 years ago +25 / -0

He is intentionally pushing them harder and harder. He wants them to go for it. It will kick off the swift justice. It just feels like the stage is set and the time is right.

permalink save report block reply
▲ 4 ▼
– Jacurutu99 4 points 3 years ago +4 / -0

LOL it's Open Season on these fucks. They are nervous as fuck to actually go for an arrest but they also falsely believe that it will be the only thing left to save them. They can go get 'em some and see how it plays out for them.

permalink parent save report block reply
▲ 3 ▼
– atarikee 3 points 3 years ago +3 / -0

That's when the newly-formed Department of FAFO activates and all hell breaks loose for them...

permalink parent save report block reply
▲ 3 ▼
– SaviorTrump777 3 points 3 years ago +3 / -0

Correct..Prison and bars can't contain trump. Just like death and a big boulder couldn't keep jesus in the tomb!

permalink parent save report block reply
▲ 2 ▼
– OverQualified 2 points 3 years ago +2 / -0

Savior Trump, ..."can't contain him.." "like Jesus".

permalink parent save report block reply
▲ 1 ▼
– deleted 1 point 3 years ago +1 / -0
▲ 3 ▼
– ImaSueDeNym 3 points 3 years ago +3 / -0

Stfu handshake fag

Says the handshake...

Edited to add:

Awww, he deleted his post. I'm 2nd hand embarrassed for him. 😂😂😂

permalink parent save report block reply
▲ 11 ▼
– queue-anon 11 points 3 years ago +11 / -0

Do they not understand they are creating a martyr out of trump?

permalink save report block reply
▲ 1 ▼
– Jacurutu99 1 point 3 years ago +1 / -0

They have already been tricked several times over to deplete their ammo. This is the single hail-Mary they have left.

permalink parent save report block reply
▲ 6 ▼
– NCSWIC2020x2 6 points 3 years ago +6 / -0

I’m not smart enough to figure out where this J6 thing is going but it was clearly staged and orchestrated. It’s going somewhere big. It’s an important chess piece on the board. Will they make the move on Trump? Indictment? What comes next?

permalink save report block reply
▲ 4 ▼
– Archon69 4 points 3 years ago +4 / -0

arrest

permalink parent save report block reply
▲ 7 ▼
– Jabber1 7 points 3 years ago +7 / -0

The first arrest…

permalink parent save report block reply
▲ 1 ▼
– Frayed-2 1 point 3 years ago +1 / -0

How would arresting Trump “confirm direction”? Looks like a very wrong direction to me

permalink parent save report block reply
▲ 3 ▼
– theSnap 3 points 3 years ago +3 / -0

If the direction is members of government being arrested, then that's a direction I am very interested in

permalink parent save report block reply
▲ 2 ▼
– deleted 2 points 3 years ago +2 / -0
▲ 2 ▼
– OverQualified 2 points 3 years ago +2 / -0

Can't tell if serious. Maybe some is serious but not all? Mostly I don't get the blond housewife ref. I don't even know what a Stm Pete troll is. Sounds interesting though. Educate me?

permalink parent save report block reply
▲ 3 ▼
– Melanias_Sunglasses 3 points 3 years ago +3 / -0

Not law savvy, but is it really double jeopardy?

permalink save report block reply
▲ 3 ▼
– Archon69 3 points 3 years ago +3 / -0

By what authority does Congress act as the Judiciary or Executive branches?

permalink parent save report block reply
▲ 3 ▼
– OverQualified 3 points 3 years ago +3 / -0

They don't. And they don't purport to be. It is why they make recommendations, instead of convicting and sentencing.

permalink parent save report block reply
▲ 3 ▼
– ImaSueDeNym 3 points 3 years ago +3 / -0

No. Not in the least.

Impeachment hearings are not criminal trials. They are Constitutional proceedings. All an Impeachment can result in is a President being removed from office and possibly being barred from holding any public office again, or not.

Presidents are largely protected from criminal charges and trials while in office. If Trump had been removed from office as a result of his Impeachment, it is likely he would have faced being charged by the DOJ as the Jan 6th Committee is recommending now.

He never had a criminal trial, so there is no double jeopardy.

permalink parent save report block reply
▲ 1 ▼
– dec3169 1 point 3 years ago +1 / -0

At first I was certain you were right but now I'm questioning myself. I agree they are 2 different things but the fact that he was required to submit evidence before a Federal proceeding that was in fact overseen by the CJOTUS should somehow count for that. I don't know for sure but I would sure hope there is something on the books that addresses cases like these. I mean it was an impeachment trial and it was federal. A guilty verdict would have resulted in removal from office and being barred from ever holding any office again. A normal civil trial can't do something that grave.

Lawfags - any precedents on the books for something like this? I imagine this is one of those one-of-a-kind things.

permalink parent save report block reply
▲ 1 ▼
– ImaSueDeNym 1 point 3 years ago +1 / -0

Depending on the crime, being removed from office could be getting off easy. For instance, if a President was accused of treason or murder.

Impeachment hearings are simply not the same as criminal trials.

permalink parent save report block reply
▲ 1 ▼
– dec3169 1 point 3 years ago +1 / -0

The impeachment hearings were in the House. The impeachment trial was in the Senate.

I know it is not the same as a criminal trial, but it is also not a civil trial where double jeopardy would not apply. I think it is a grey area that deserves to be researched.

permalink parent save report block reply
▲ 2 ▼
– ImaSueDeNym 2 points 3 years ago +2 / -0

I did a little digging and discovered that there was a clause in the Constitution specifically about this.

Article I, Section 3, Clause 7:

“Judgment in Cases of Impeachment shall not extend further than to removal from Office, and disqualification to hold and enjoy any Office of honor, Trust or Profit under the United States: but the Party convicted shall nevertheless be liable and subject to Indictment, Trial, Judgment and Punishment, according to Law.”

So whatever was decided for the Impeachment applies only to the Impeachment.

permalink parent save report block reply
▲ 3 ▼
– OverQualified 3 points 3 years ago +3 / -0

Can you explain why it is that Trump is so mistaken? Why would he misinterpret something like that. I mean, if it's in the least bit time consuming or stressful then it would behoove him to only believe things that are true. Otherwise, credibility issues again, and not to mention staying focused on only true things seems like a no-brainer.

permalink parent save report block reply
▲ 1 ▼
– ImaSueDeNym 1 point 3 years ago +1 / -0

No, I can't explain why Trump believes double jeopardy comes into play here.

The man is not Jesus Christ. He's not infallible. He's not a lawyer. And to be blunt, if you look at the people he's hired or had appointed, he's not the best judge of character or intellect. Cohen, Bannon, Sessions, Pence, Bolton, and many others I can't recall at the moment.

On one hand, we have a specific clause in the Constitution that clearly says that double jeopardy doesn't apply to Impeachment decisions.

On the other hand, we have a human being that is not versed in constitutional law, who is a master of the spin, and who is facing being charged with some serious crimes.

Sometimes reality is a bitch and hard to face.

permalink parent save report block reply
▲ 3 ▼
– HelloDolly 3 points 3 years ago +3 / -0

no

permalink parent save report block reply
▲ 2 ▼
– MathletesFoot 2 points 3 years ago +2 / -0

What's he defending the Republican Party for?

permalink save report block reply
▲ 3 ▼
– ghostsage 3 points 3 years ago +3 / -0

It is what we have, and it was built of appropriate conservative ideology. It has been overrun by RINOs in our time; but we don't retreat, we take it back.

permalink parent save report block reply
▲ 1 ▼
– OverQualified 1 point 3 years ago +1 / -0

Seriously tho. Though I think it's obvious, after all. Enemy of enemy is friend even if for now they are enemy.

permalink parent save report block reply
▲ 2 ▼
– WeekoWolf 2 points 3 years ago +2 / -0

He's waiting for their last card so He can play his Trump Card. Haha brilliant.

permalink save report block reply
▲ 1 ▼
– 17Jeff 1 point 3 years ago +1 / -0

They do this as projection to shield. If dirt comes out on them they still have lots of idiot sheep who will only think “hate trump” I’ve been wondering when the next cabal move is coming. Slow chess match

permalink save report block reply
▲ 1 ▼
– xbonesny 1 point 3 years ago +1 / -0

As I like to say..Fuck around and Find Out...

permalink save report block reply
▲ 1 ▼
– dec3169 1 point 3 years ago +1 / -0

One thing to remember - the average idiot leftist actually thinks that the 4 "charges" the J6 committee referred to the DOJ means that he is already charged with a crime. They don't know the difference.

Granted, he probably will be charged because the AG HATES him and the Republicans for keeping him off of SCOTUS. I think the way this will go is Garland will say he will "leave it to the special counsel" to determine if Trump should be charged. That way he can say he didn't have any conflicts. Then he will tell the special counsel to bury Trump.

Either way it doesn't matter. Once Elon allowed those tweets to reappear the evidence proved Trump not only didn't incite Schumer's erection (lol) but he actively asked people to stay peaceful and to go home. If DOJ wants to pursue the "defrauding the US" charge they know Trump will flood the courts with election fraud evidence they can't refute. I see no path for the DOJ to win this.

permalink save report block reply
▲ 1 ▼
– anon1138 1 point 3 years ago +1 / -0

This will likely be an attempt (and not their last) before January. Before GOP gets in there and rips the j6 committee to shreds and exposes the farce that it is.

They are panicking. Hold the line

permalink save report block reply
▲ 2 ▼
– ImaSueDeNym 2 points 3 years ago +2 / -0

They have already sent their recommendations to the DOJ. They are done. It makes no difference that the GOP will control the House next term.

It's all out of the House's hands now, and into the DOJ's.

permalink parent save report block reply

Welcome


The Great Awakening


We are researchers who deal in open-source information, reasoned argument, and dank memes. We do battle in the sphere of ideas and ideas only. We neither need nor condone the use of force in our work here. WE ARE THE PUBLIC FACE OF Q. OUR MISSION IS TO RED-PILL NORMIES.


WHY Q?

"Those who cannot understand that we cannot simply start arresting w/o first: ensuring the safety & well-being of the population shifting the narrative removing those in DC through resignation to ensure success defeating ISIS/MS13 to prevent fail-safes freezing assets to remove network-to-network abilities kill off COC to prevent top-down comms/org, etc. etc. should not be participating in discussions." Q


Welcome to the Digital Battlefield — Together We Win

Rules


Q Supporters

This is The Great Awakening. Our community is international, focused on helping ourselves and others walk away from the programming, and return our governments to "by the people, for the people!"



Follow the Law

No posts or comments that violate laws in your jurisdiction or the United States. The Feds are always watching!



No Bad Behavior!

No doxing, including revealing personal information of non-public figures, as well as addresses, phone numbers, etc. of public figures. All GAW users must adhere to the highest standards of conduct, whichever .WIN they are on. If we are notified by other moderators of incivil behavior on other .WINs, you WILL be banned here!



Civil Discussion ONLY**

They want you divided.

They want you labeled by race, religion, class, sex, etc.

Divided you are weak [no collective power].

Divided you attack each other and miss the true target [them].



No PAYtriots/No Self Promotion

Linking or promoting merchandise, fundraising, or spamming personal websites, blogs, or channels is not permitted. Do not attempt to profit from Q or advertise for those who do. Peace is the prize. We do it for free.



Questions and Concerns

All moderation questions and concerns should be submitted via modmail. DO NOT GRIEF the mods.



Expand your thinking

Remember, this .WIN is the public face of the Great Awakening, and, as a member here, you agree to represent the Great Awakening movement against Globalism, Communism and Progressive Insanity in the best, most positive way possible. NOTE: Your comments and posts may become news. Keep it classy!

This is not a 'fringe conspiracy' site: Visit https://conspiracies.win if that's your thing!



No doomers or shills

If you can't use common sense, you'll get banned without hesitation. If you're a shill, you fall under this rule. If you're a doomer, you fall under this rule as you just add garbage to the site like the other two. This includes forum sliding.



General Rules

  • Mods will issue NO warnings, followed by temporary bans and/or permanent bans. DO NOT GRIEF THE MODS.

  • Keep posts related to topics Q has raised or that are current.

  • Keep post duplication (especially from other .WINs) to a minimum.

  • HIGH EFFORT, HIGH-INFO posts only! Please respect other readers' time. Please use descriptive titles. No URLs in titles, pls. No clickbait.

  • No fame-fagging; no, "your" post did not get removed! Were you the original author?? Eyes on the prize, people!

  • Memes encouraged, but no low-quality, low-info posts.

  • Keep it honest and accurate.

  • GAW Supporters ONLY. (Sorry, the train had no brakes.)

  • Handshake noobs will be scrutinized by their Q knowledge, sincerity, and respect.

  • Remember, your conduct here represents the Q movement! OUR ENEMIES ARE WATCHING!

  • Please direct all complaints to modmail first!


Resources


WELCOME TO THE DIGITAL BATTLEFIELD


"River of Search" script:


GAW post formatting tips


Q Research (Q only posts at 8kun)


Q post archives (qagg.news) others 1 2 3 4


Browse Drops from the beginning


QProofs.com


Learn to read the Q map


Book of Q Proofs v1.3 (pdf)


Law of War & Majic Eyes Qnly Resources


Trumps twitter archive


POTUS: The Calm Before The Storm


Pedosta and DNC dumps


GIFs & QPosts


Poll Post Format


SPY ON US! See: mod Logs


The Greatest Show on Earth!


New to Q? "The Earth Chronicles Ep 12: Q & The White-Hat Op: What's Real, What's Not?"


Moderators

  • dropgun
  • catsfive
  • AutoMod
  • Filter
  • parallax_crow
  • Fatality
  • BasedCitizen
  • Qanaut
  • and 8 more...
Message the Moderators

Terms of Service | Privacy Policy

2026.02.01 - pv4fp (status)

Copyright © 2026.

Terms of Service | Privacy Policy