Brave sold out. Either that or it was a honeypot to begin with. I liked it a lot too, because it wasn't google. And it was pretty good at blocking ads. Now, I just don't trust it.
Well I'll be a monkeys uncle!!! I would say you are right. Plus my mobile brave browser doesn't autofill search results for me anyway. But yes, this is a Wikipedia issue, which is not surprising at all. However, I have been noticing brave auto adjusts my search filters. Because if I really want to find real information. Always have to go and turn safe search to off, as it always adjusts it back to moderate after I exit. I have noticed if I leave it on moderate, I pretty much just get google results.
Every time a new platform gets popular, they get paid millions to suppress stories. Kind of like they did with Twitter. BTW, at least we now know where some of the millions of missing money went from the Pentagon!
There are no based search engines right now. The closest you can get is probably yandex. But none of it compares to 10-15 years ago when sites were merely indexed and your searches provided direct unaltered results based on that.
If you are young enough to have missed the golden years of the internet, I feel for you. It was quite a ride. This current facsimile of it sucks.
I don't know, I think I'll leave my 300 baud modem and BBS door games in the past while I play games on broadband with friends across the world in VR on my monster PC. Absolutely has been a blast going from nothing to a global staple, but I'm looking forward to bigger and better times. I do agree though early google and facebook were way better than today.
Doctors are not anti-science who promote safe, effective, inexpensive, widely available cures that have few side effects and that prevent billion$ from going into the pockets of Big Harma. They are not anti-science who tell the truth about a disease and treatments for it.
Doctors are anti-science who promote an untested experimental GMO pseudovaccine as if it were a real vaccine; who terrorize parents into giving children (with a 99.99% COVID survival rate) an injection that is known to cause death and sterility; who tell people flimsy cloth masks block viral transmission; who tell people that those who have not taken a vaccine are a threat to those who have (that is REALLY anti-science); and who insist that viruses respect 6-foot distances but not 5 feet or less.
That's a direct pull from wikipedia. Until such time as they start getting slapped with defamation suits this will go on.
Trust Brave, right?
Brave sold out. Either that or it was a honeypot to begin with. I liked it a lot too, because it wasn't google. And it was pretty good at blocking ads. Now, I just don't trust it.
I've been using Yandex.com lately and I really like it.
How about you get on Brave and type that in yourself? See if you get the same result. Takes less than half a minute.
This appears, at least to me, to be a Wikipedia issue, not a Brave issue.
Well I'll be a monkeys uncle!!! I would say you are right. Plus my mobile brave browser doesn't autofill search results for me anyway. But yes, this is a Wikipedia issue, which is not surprising at all. However, I have been noticing brave auto adjusts my search filters. Because if I really want to find real information. Always have to go and turn safe search to off, as it always adjusts it back to moderate after I exit. I have noticed if I leave it on moderate, I pretty much just get google results.
All that being said. Good job! You were correct.
Shit. Is that brave doing that, or pulling from Wikipedia?
Others have confirmed it is pulling from Wiki.
Thanks!
Just doing my part.
Hell yes!
Every time a new platform gets popular, they get paid millions to suppress stories. Kind of like they did with Twitter. BTW, at least we now know where some of the millions of missing money went from the Pentagon!
There are no based search engines right now. The closest you can get is probably yandex. But none of it compares to 10-15 years ago when sites were merely indexed and your searches provided direct unaltered results based on that.
If you are young enough to have missed the golden years of the internet, I feel for you. It was quite a ride. This current facsimile of it sucks.
Worth a few minutes of your time:
https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=bWbytHBp0zI
https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=8O_NvPpbsbw
And it's (::gasp!::) Russian
How ironic
Fun fact: Yandex name is combo of Russian ya, spelled Я (meaning I, the first-person subjective pronoun), and index
I don't know, I think I'll leave my 300 baud modem and BBS door games in the past while I play games on broadband with friends across the world in VR on my monster PC. Absolutely has been a blast going from nothing to a global staple, but I'm looking forward to bigger and better times. I do agree though early google and facebook were way better than today.
LOL
We found out they were right all along. Where's the correction to this complete bs?
That's cute they think name-calling still works.
Doctors are not anti-science who promote safe, effective, inexpensive, widely available cures that have few side effects and that prevent billion$ from going into the pockets of Big Harma. They are not anti-science who tell the truth about a disease and treatments for it.
Doctors are anti-science who promote an untested experimental GMO pseudovaccine as if it were a real vaccine; who terrorize parents into giving children (with a 99.99% COVID survival rate) an injection that is known to cause death and sterility; who tell people flimsy cloth masks block viral transmission; who tell people that those who have not taken a vaccine are a threat to those who have (that is REALLY anti-science); and who insist that viruses respect 6-foot distances but not 5 feet or less.
If “anti-science” means disagreeing with their corrupt brand of depopulation agenda political $cience, then I wear the “anti-science” label proudly.
Righteous winged, anti-pseudoscience, research group. Anyone care to hack?