After watching that cross, I cannot believe how TERRIBLE Lake's lawyers are.
Leading questions, hostile questions, so many reasons to object to easily half of the questions asked, and they just sat around twiddling their thumbs.
They had better have a LOT more hard evidence, because the legal team might as well not be present.
Well, it's certainly not unreasonable. Risking your entire career and livelihood needed to support a family, or just repay loans needed to get a law degree is not an easy choice to make.
I guess I'm glad someone is willing to do it, but worried they may greatly hurt the case either from ignorance or malice.
The evidence seems to speak for itself, thankfully. Hopefully that will be enough.
I don't know what online law school these guys got their degrees from, or how they passed the bar, but thank God that judge is going easy on them and is actually interested in the merits of the case.
Why does 'our side' always have such loser laywers? Remember the trump impeachment laywer dude lol I was just shaking my head, and samehow he pulled it off. But wow...
It's almost like they want to purposely throw it. Maybe they are just nervous or something but dang aren't they professionals? How about you lawyer like a professional?
Yeah, it does seem to be a trend. Most probably view it as career killers, so all that's left are the lawyers with little to lose (which usually means they're starting from the bottom).
Fortunately the conservatives in these cases almost always have mountains of evidence in their favor, so doesn't require a whole lot of 'lawyering'.
Also, the statement from the forensic investigator is pretty damning. Hearing is definitely picking up for Lake.
Thankfully they have the evidence on their side, because the legal acumen of the representation certainly wasn't enough to win this case.
I would think for such a prominent and historic trial they would have pulled out the really big legal guns. Weird!
After watching that cross, I cannot believe how TERRIBLE Lake's lawyers are.
Leading questions, hostile questions, so many reasons to object to easily half of the questions asked, and they just sat around twiddling their thumbs.
They had better have a LOT more hard evidence, because the legal team might as well not be present.
The problem is that the really big conservative legal guns wont touch anything election related. Cowardice is a huge problem for our side.
that could also be due to a law that prevents republicans from questioning the outcome of elections
Well, it's certainly not unreasonable. Risking your entire career and livelihood needed to support a family, or just repay loans needed to get a law degree is not an easy choice to make.
I guess I'm glad someone is willing to do it, but worried they may greatly hurt the case either from ignorance or malice.
Her attorneys suck. They may prevail however if the judge isn't paid for.
The evidence seems to speak for itself, thankfully. Hopefully that will be enough.
I don't know what online law school these guys got their degrees from, or how they passed the bar, but thank God that judge is going easy on them and is actually interested in the merits of the case.
Why does 'our side' always have such loser laywers? Remember the trump impeachment laywer dude lol I was just shaking my head, and samehow he pulled it off. But wow... It's almost like they want to purposely throw it. Maybe they are just nervous or something but dang aren't they professionals? How about you lawyer like a professional?
Yeah, it does seem to be a trend. Most probably view it as career killers, so all that's left are the lawyers with little to lose (which usually means they're starting from the bottom).
Fortunately the conservatives in these cases almost always have mountains of evidence in their favor, so doesn't require a whole lot of 'lawyering'.