However, there are screenshots of now-deleted tweets from Richer announcing the PAC, as well as news articles reporting it.
Looks like Stephen Richer may have perjured himself 💣
Source: https://twitter.com/spiro_ghost/status/1605664186591240195?s=46&t=IBKmGXf33emiQhyvLgsbaQ
did the plaintiff bring this evidence?
I was pretty surprised when he asked the question and then just moved on. Her team needs to start crossing the goal line and not spiking the ball at the 5 . I was fully expecting them to show proof that he had. Instead they just took his answer and moved on. Asking the damn question isn't enough. You have to SHOW THE EVIDENCE so the judge can make an informed decision.
This👆🏻👆🏻👆🏻! That should have been a Perry Mason moment! And I’m not even a lawyer!
Yep. Because of these attorneys I have had that damned Perry Mason song by Ozzy stuck in my head since yesterday. I hated it then, and I hate it even more now. ;o)
It's the judge restricting the evidence under time constraints. I watched the trial yesterday. You can tell the judge is in with the defendants attorneys. He's soft on them... Most likely he's already been 'paid-off' (or threatened). Just like Hobbs threatened the county official with jail if they didn't certify...
I am not a Debbie Downer, but the Mafia-like cartel runs AZ, even the judges.
Lake will lose, Lake will appeal. So, Lake will spend the next two years in the lawsuit, until the next stolen election cycle rolls around...
Our gut tells us this will happen. The best thing we can do is hope for more explosive truths to come out so the public can understand what is going on in elections.