However, there are screenshots of now-deleted tweets from Richer announcing the PAC, as well as news articles reporting it.
Looks like Stephen Richer may have perjured himself 💣
Source: https://twitter.com/spiro_ghost/status/1605664186591240195?s=46&t=IBKmGXf33emiQhyvLgsbaQ
did the plaintiff bring this evidence?
I was pretty surprised when he asked the question and then just moved on. Her team needs to start crossing the goal line and not spiking the ball at the 5 . I was fully expecting them to show proof that he had. Instead they just took his answer and moved on. Asking the damn question isn't enough. You have to SHOW THE EVIDENCE so the judge can make an informed decision.
This👆🏻👆🏻👆🏻! That should have been a Perry Mason moment! And I’m not even a lawyer!
Yep. Because of these attorneys I have had that damned Perry Mason song by Ozzy stuck in my head since yesterday. I hated it then, and I hate it even more now. ;o)
It's the judge restricting the evidence under time constraints. I watched the trial yesterday. You can tell the judge is in with the defendants attorneys. He's soft on them... Most likely he's already been 'paid-off' (or threatened). Just like Hobbs threatened the county official with jail if they didn't certify...
I am not a Debbie Downer, but the Mafia-like cartel runs AZ, even the judges.
Lake will lose, Lake will appeal. So, Lake will spend the next two years in the lawsuit, until the next stolen election cycle rolls around...
Our gut tells us this will happen. The best thing we can do is hope for more explosive truths to come out so the public can understand what is going on in elections.
Maybe he did not "create" the PAC. He just ran it after his lawyer created it and set it up.
Great “Lawyerese”! Kinda like “it depends on what your definition of “is” is”.
Thought it was his mom who started the PAC.
The plaintiff's would not have questioned him on this if it weren't true...They must have the receipts, Richer is a liar and just sealed his fate.
BTW; I watched the whole trial yesterday. Major bombs from plaintiff's attorney. Lake has to prove maladministration and that her voters were disenfranchised ON ELECTION DAY. I think the attorneys are providing evidence. But the judge is limiting testimony, evidence and is sticking to time constraints. It's really frustrating that Lake is really not getting her day in court.
This judge seems 'soft' on Hobb's attorneys, but rigid for plaintiff's. Seems like he is already paid-off so to speak. I can see the outcome already. 'Judge in Lake case failed to find evidence..., case dismissed'
That's another new name for perjury.
Perjured himself ha! Precedent says thats not a thing anymore