One must suspect this description of over-hype. No combat is "easy." But, relatively, there were not "many casualties" and the Russian forces did quickly reach their objectives. What changed the game was the decision by NATO to jump into play. That is about to be addressed. I would rely more on Col. MacGregor's assessment than Mike Adams'.
I know. It is kind of sad. Mike Adams is very evidently an earnest person, but he knee-jerks all the time. The net result is to diminish his credibility. I used to follow him somewhat regularly. Now, I only "dip in" to see what flotsam is on top.
One must suspect this description of over-hype. No combat is "easy." But, relatively, there were not "many casualties" and the Russian forces did quickly reach their objectives. What changed the game was the decision by NATO to jump into play. That is about to be addressed. I would rely more on Col. MacGregor's assessment than Mike Adams'.
I saw "natural news" and proceeded to laugh.
There have been so many hype posts from them that turned out to not even be close to true.
I know. It is kind of sad. Mike Adams is very evidently an earnest person, but he knee-jerks all the time. The net result is to diminish his credibility. I used to follow him somewhat regularly. Now, I only "dip in" to see what flotsam is on top.
Yup
Natural News is a shitty news source