However, the underlying reason for their decision to secede was their desire to maintain and expand the practice of slavery, which is morally reprehensible and completely unacceptable.
There we go, throw out the LIE, so that people think it's a Moral High Ground taken by the Aggressor....
Sounds exactly like something some Clown from ANTIFA would say, IF they were living back then....
the Truth is that Under States Rights, the STATE has the Responsibility to Allow or Make Unlawful certain things, Drugs, Murder, Property Damage, Rape, Slavery, Stealing, etc....
And the southern Slave owners had already seen that they were actually losing money because of the Ownership of Slaves, and because of the New Machines that were being invented, such as the Cotton gin, The Sewing Machine, the Vacuum Milker, so they were looking for ways to get rid of the Slaves, and move in the Machines in order to improve their Plantations and be prosperous....
Slavery was on the way OUT,and the Northern States knew it, so did the Rothschilds in Europe, so they got Busy planning and implementing the destruction of the Southern States....
Incorrect.
The 1856 Democratic Convention illustrates the deep division within the party over the issue of slavery. Both Northern and Southern Democrats supported slavery, but disagreed on how it should be addressed. The Northern Democrats favored allowing individual states to decide on the legality of slavery, while Southern Democrats believed it should be legal in all states. This division within the party, as well as the Northern Democrats' alignment with the 1956 convention, shows that the issue of slavery was not simply a geographical one, but rather a party-wide issue for Democrats. This demonstrates that the Democratic Party, as a whole, supported slavery, rather than it being solely a southern issue.
Since the Beginning of the Union, Laws that the federation Adopts, are all started at State Level, collected and organized that Federal Level, and when they reach a Majority at State Level, meaning a Mjaority of State support a Specific Law, then the U.S. Clowngress puts it to vote, and make it Law....
They haven't done that in DECADES, like 70 Years or more....
Americans did NOT want to join the War in Europe, some were aware of the War of 1812, and didn't trust the Brits to turn once again, and we still shouldn't trust them in any way....
It was a state issue, but humans are not and should never have been property of another human. Ownership of a other is not a right. Removing it as an option was the correct and moral thing to do. Should we make murder, incest, and rape state issues as well while we are at it?
Take for Example, the Driving while Drunk thing, yes, it is annoying to have someone drunk in front of you on the Road, BUT, if he doesn't Hit another car, he has NOT done anything bad....
As long as he doesn't CAUSE HARM, he is still within His Rights of Do No Harm, the Possibility of Killing someone exists whether a person is Sober or Drunk, and it's Equal Chance in either case....
""Preventative Law"", is not Good Law, it is a Direct Abuse of the Law....
This is what the DemonRats are pushing against the 2nd Amendment, remove ALL Guns to Prevent people from using Guns o Kill other people, so Lets Remove ALL CARS, to prevent people from Driving Drunk and maybe, possibly, by some odd chance, killing other people....
I think you only read half of that. The southern democrats wanted what we have now but the opposite. Force legal slavery in all states. They weren't fighting to make it a state issue. Reread what I wrote
The End if Slavery has to start somewhere, and by Rights, 10th Amendment, it should begin in the States, not in the federation....
Yet, Lincoln pulled out the U.S. Army and completely Conquered ALL of the states, and that's why we are in this nasty mess, he essentially Enslaved all of us, under the federal Govt....
But that war was still about States Rights, not about Slavery, and I really don't understand why you keep harping on Slavery, considering it was Legal in All the states to begin with, then one by one they began to get rid of it, New Jersey I believe was the last one....
There we go, throw out the LIE, so that people think it's a Moral High Ground taken by the Aggressor....
Sounds exactly like something some Clown from ANTIFA would say, IF they were living back then....
the Truth is that Under States Rights, the STATE has the Responsibility to Allow or Make Unlawful certain things, Drugs, Murder, Property Damage, Rape, Slavery, Stealing, etc....
And the southern Slave owners had already seen that they were actually losing money because of the Ownership of Slaves, and because of the New Machines that were being invented, such as the Cotton gin, The Sewing Machine, the Vacuum Milker, so they were looking for ways to get rid of the Slaves, and move in the Machines in order to improve their Plantations and be prosperous....
Slavery was on the way OUT,and the Northern States knew it, so did the Rothschilds in Europe, so they got Busy planning and implementing the destruction of the Southern States....
Incorrect. The 1856 Democratic Convention illustrates the deep division within the party over the issue of slavery. Both Northern and Southern Democrats supported slavery, but disagreed on how it should be addressed. The Northern Democrats favored allowing individual states to decide on the legality of slavery, while Southern Democrats believed it should be legal in all states. This division within the party, as well as the Northern Democrats' alignment with the 1956 convention, shows that the issue of slavery was not simply a geographical one, but rather a party-wide issue for Democrats. This demonstrates that the Democratic Party, as a whole, supported slavery, rather than it being solely a southern issue.
Exactly, it was always a State Issue....
That is what I've been sayin this whole time....
Since the Beginning of the Union, Laws that the federation Adopts, are all started at State Level, collected and organized that Federal Level, and when they reach a Majority at State Level, meaning a Mjaority of State support a Specific Law, then the U.S. Clowngress puts it to vote, and make it Law....
They haven't done that in DECADES, like 70 Years or more....
Americans did NOT want to join the War in Europe, some were aware of the War of 1812, and didn't trust the Brits to turn once again, and we still shouldn't trust them in any way....
It was a state issue, but humans are not and should never have been property of another human. Ownership of a other is not a right. Removing it as an option was the correct and moral thing to do. Should we make murder, incest, and rape state issues as well while we are at it?
Those things are already State Issues....
Take for Example, the Driving while Drunk thing, yes, it is annoying to have someone drunk in front of you on the Road, BUT, if he doesn't Hit another car, he has NOT done anything bad....
As long as he doesn't CAUSE HARM, he is still within His Rights of Do No Harm, the Possibility of Killing someone exists whether a person is Sober or Drunk, and it's Equal Chance in either case....
""Preventative Law"", is not Good Law, it is a Direct Abuse of the Law....
This is what the DemonRats are pushing against the 2nd Amendment, remove ALL Guns to Prevent people from using Guns o Kill other people, so Lets Remove ALL CARS, to prevent people from Driving Drunk and maybe, possibly, by some odd chance, killing other people....
I think you only read half of that. The southern democrats wanted what we have now but the opposite. Force legal slavery in all states. They weren't fighting to make it a state issue. Reread what I wrote
The End if Slavery has to start somewhere, and by Rights, 10th Amendment, it should begin in the States, not in the federation....
Yet, Lincoln pulled out the U.S. Army and completely Conquered ALL of the states, and that's why we are in this nasty mess, he essentially Enslaved all of us, under the federal Govt....
But that war was still about States Rights, not about Slavery, and I really don't understand why you keep harping on Slavery, considering it was Legal in All the states to begin with, then one by one they began to get rid of it, New Jersey I believe was the last one....