Since the Beginning of the Union, Laws that the federation Adopts, are all started at State Level, collected and organized that Federal Level, and when they reach a Majority at State Level, meaning a Mjaority of State support a Specific Law, then the U.S. Clowngress puts it to vote, and make it Law....
They haven't done that in DECADES, like 70 Years or more....
Americans did NOT want to join the War in Europe, some were aware of the War of 1812, and didn't trust the Brits to turn once again, and we still shouldn't trust them in any way....
It was a state issue, but humans are not and should never have been property of another human. Ownership of a other is not a right. Removing it as an option was the correct and moral thing to do. Should we make murder, incest, and rape state issues as well while we are at it?
Take for Example, the Driving while Drunk thing, yes, it is annoying to have someone drunk in front of you on the Road, BUT, if he doesn't Hit another car, he has NOT done anything bad....
As long as he doesn't CAUSE HARM, he is still within His Rights of Do No Harm, the Possibility of Killing someone exists whether a person is Sober or Drunk, and it's Equal Chance in either case....
""Preventative Law"", is not Good Law, it is a Direct Abuse of the Law....
This is what the DemonRats are pushing against the 2nd Amendment, remove ALL Guns to Prevent people from using Guns o Kill other people, so Lets Remove ALL CARS, to prevent people from Driving Drunk and maybe, possibly, by some odd chance, killing other people....
Murder and Rape and Stealing and Slavery all should be and in fact Are states Issues and Responsibilities, that is why States can have the Death Penalty, and by Rights should have it, and be very active in it....
None of that should be Dictated to the States by the Federation, just like Abortion, which is direct Murder, Slavery too should've been left to the States....
After all, they were Enslaving their Fellow State Citizens, and That IS unlawful....
I'm not Defending anyone, I know Slavery is bad, I know it is all around the Whole world right now, but I'm just saying that the Right to make it Unlawful, is the Responsibility of the States, not the U.S. Military....
And yes, I do directly blame Lincoln for the approx 1.8 Million lives lost to that infernal War....
I think you only read half of that. The southern democrats wanted what we have now but the opposite. Force legal slavery in all states. They weren't fighting to make it a state issue. Reread what I wrote
The End if Slavery has to start somewhere, and by Rights, 10th Amendment, it should begin in the States, not in the federation....
Yet, Lincoln pulled out the U.S. Army and completely Conquered ALL of the states, and that's why we are in this nasty mess, he essentially Enslaved all of us, under the federal Govt....
But that war was still about States Rights, not about Slavery, and I really don't understand why you keep harping on Slavery, considering it was Legal in All the states to begin with, then one by one they began to get rid of it, New Jersey I believe was the last one....
I'm harping on slavery because that was the issue, the reason around why the states felt they wanted to leave the union. They wanted to keep slavery and felt that the Union was overstepping by telling them slavery was illegal. THE POINT you are missing is that if the southern candidate won, they were going to make is so states cannot make slavery illegal and force it to be legal in all states.
Exactly, it was always a State Issue....
That is what I've been sayin this whole time....
Since the Beginning of the Union, Laws that the federation Adopts, are all started at State Level, collected and organized that Federal Level, and when they reach a Majority at State Level, meaning a Mjaority of State support a Specific Law, then the U.S. Clowngress puts it to vote, and make it Law....
They haven't done that in DECADES, like 70 Years or more....
Americans did NOT want to join the War in Europe, some were aware of the War of 1812, and didn't trust the Brits to turn once again, and we still shouldn't trust them in any way....
It was a state issue, but humans are not and should never have been property of another human. Ownership of a other is not a right. Removing it as an option was the correct and moral thing to do. Should we make murder, incest, and rape state issues as well while we are at it?
Those things are already State Issues....
Take for Example, the Driving while Drunk thing, yes, it is annoying to have someone drunk in front of you on the Road, BUT, if he doesn't Hit another car, he has NOT done anything bad....
As long as he doesn't CAUSE HARM, he is still within His Rights of Do No Harm, the Possibility of Killing someone exists whether a person is Sober or Drunk, and it's Equal Chance in either case....
""Preventative Law"", is not Good Law, it is a Direct Abuse of the Law....
This is what the DemonRats are pushing against the 2nd Amendment, remove ALL Guns to Prevent people from using Guns o Kill other people, so Lets Remove ALL CARS, to prevent people from Driving Drunk and maybe, possibly, by some odd chance, killing other people....
None of what I said was state issues... you are trying but failing
Murder and Rape and Stealing and Slavery all should be and in fact Are states Issues and Responsibilities, that is why States can have the Death Penalty, and by Rights should have it, and be very active in it....
None of that should be Dictated to the States by the Federation, just like Abortion, which is direct Murder, Slavery too should've been left to the States....
After all, they were Enslaving their Fellow State Citizens, and That IS unlawful....
Also, democrats are the slave loving people you seem to be defending
I'm not Defending anyone, I know Slavery is bad, I know it is all around the Whole world right now, but I'm just saying that the Right to make it Unlawful, is the Responsibility of the States, not the U.S. Military....
And yes, I do directly blame Lincoln for the approx 1.8 Million lives lost to that infernal War....
I think you only read half of that. The southern democrats wanted what we have now but the opposite. Force legal slavery in all states. They weren't fighting to make it a state issue. Reread what I wrote
The End if Slavery has to start somewhere, and by Rights, 10th Amendment, it should begin in the States, not in the federation....
Yet, Lincoln pulled out the U.S. Army and completely Conquered ALL of the states, and that's why we are in this nasty mess, he essentially Enslaved all of us, under the federal Govt....
But that war was still about States Rights, not about Slavery, and I really don't understand why you keep harping on Slavery, considering it was Legal in All the states to begin with, then one by one they began to get rid of it, New Jersey I believe was the last one....
I'm harping on slavery because that was the issue, the reason around why the states felt they wanted to leave the union. They wanted to keep slavery and felt that the Union was overstepping by telling them slavery was illegal. THE POINT you are missing is that if the southern candidate won, they were going to make is so states cannot make slavery illegal and force it to be legal in all states.
WOW, that's one I had not heard....
So they were going to Force the States, into making Slavery Legal, to the point that the States just couldn't vote against it???
Like stripping the States of their Right to make it Illegal???
Hmm, sounds like a States Rights issue to me....