https://jessicar.substack.com/p/igg4-and-cancer-a-mechanism-of-action
Namely, form immune complexes and bind receptors on cells for removal of unwanted cells. So those three ways: the ADCC, ADCP and CDC - that aid in removal of unwanted cells are all nullified in the scenario where IgG4 is prevalent. Worse than that, since the subclass switch is literally the by-product of continuous antigen stimulation, then this is an immunological endorsement of a ‘win’ for IgG4 if we consider competition for binding sites. In effect, IgG4 outcompetes IgG1 and thus, the scales tip from tumor suppression, to tumor progression. All because of IgG4.
Now I don’t want to scare everyone, but persistent re-injection of a messenger RNA that encodes a foreign, highly immunogenic protein, is NOT a good idea in this context. This is precisely continuous antigen stimulation by spike protein. Not only that, since we know that both the mRNA and the spike protein are long-lasting in the body, you mightn’t even have to re-inject yourself repeatedly qualify as undergoing continuous antigen stimulation. In fact, I would bet that this would be a given. Furthermore, I would bet that due to this continuous antigen stimulation, the IgG1:IgG4 subclass ratio is inverted in people who are persistently making spike, and that these people would be subject to cancer promotion, rather than suppression.
My take home message: This is why people are experiencing relapses of cancers previously in remission and this is why new and rare cancers are appearing as well. (Bold in original)
Turbo cancer killed my mom last January. She was vaxed and boosted. 64yrs old and had felt bad for a few weeks and then went in to the hospital with terrible swelling in abdomen, inability to eat and horrible pain. They kept her in for 2 weeks with all kinds of tests before they finally told her it was inoperable, incurable cancer and she had a months or 2 maybe. They never could tell what kind of cancer it was - couldn't tell where it originated. She was so eat up with it they just couldn't figure it out even after all kinds of tests, scans, and even exploratory surgery, she died a few days later. I don't know if anyone in my family besides my Aunt will see the truth, see what really happened. Probably not.
The mainstream media must be taken down and blackouts on all TVs until they come up with important matters only for citizens and the truth.
A friend got the shot early, because a nurse friend of his convinced him to, despite my trying to talk him out of it. A year later he had emergency surgery for a cancer that his doctor said “suddenly and aggressively came out of nowhere”.
The people behind the Died Suddenly documentary need to make another about Cancer Suddenly.
Sorry to hear about your friend. Something that shows promise in fighting cancer (I think especially in the jabbed -- only a theory at this point) is senolytics such as fisetin, quercetin, and theaflavin (natural plant-derived supplements) and dasatinib (a cancer drug).
Pharma is scrambling to create an artificial, patentable senolytic they can sell for big money, but natural senolytics are already available and very safe (although everything does have dangers). Fisetin is found in strawberries, quercetin in onions and apples, and theaflavin is an extract of tea.
Senolytics remove senescent cells. Those cells build up as we get older because the body's removal system for them weakens, and the more senescent cells we have, the "older" our body becomes. Every system in the body is affected by senescent cell accumulation and that includes the immune system and its surveillance function. When THAT becomes weak, new cancer cells are ignored instead of targeted for removal. -- And THAT appears to be a major mechanism (possibly THE major mechanism) for TurboCancer. As we all know by now, the jab wreaks havoc on the immune system.
I'm thinking of doing a post specifically about this topic; the three natural senolytics mentioned above all have strong additional benefits and pretty much zero toxicity, so even if the anti-cancer benefits for the jabbed are small or non-existent, they might be worth taking. There is some mixed data, both pro and con, on their effects during conventional cancer therapy however (there is nearly always some mixed data on anything biological, it seems) so as usual it pays to do some research before an intervention.
I've lost 3 friends to turbo cancer in the last year with 2 more in the process. My mom is undergoing a clotetcomy as I type.
Tomorrow I will be going to say goodbye to my brother. He was diagnosed with a brain tumor about two months ago and after surgery and radiation he started having severe headaches. After an MRI they found a second tumor that he was scheduled to have surgery on today. This second tumor developed in just two months time. I found out a few hours ago that he did not have the surgery but has instead been discharged to hospice. He is a good man and too young, deceived by the media and the medical establishment to get the shots. He convinced my mother to get the shots as well, contrary to my warnings. She died last year. Her last MRI showed extensive cancerous tumors throughout her chest and abdomen which developed quickly as she had annual scans due to a history of breast cancer and the scans were clear earlier that year. I am convinced these deaths were a result of the shot.