Brunsons' response pic 1
(media.greatawakening.win)
You're viewing a single comment thread. View all comments, or full comment thread.
Comments (30)
sorted by:
I’m sorry but I have intentionally taken a break from the alternative news during this holiday season. What is the context of Brunson’s response to Tracy Beanz? Reading the response, it sounds like Tracy Beanz, et.al. authored an article claiming Brunson’s case before the SCOTUS is garbage. If true, I thought Tracy Beanz was a patriot! Or is she a paytroit?
She does good legal analysis but IMO takes it too far sometimes (arrogant).
I stopped listening to a long time ago when she argued against a Trump proposal for an Internet Bill of Rights.
I don't trust her.
This...Arrogant is correct....Both Adam and Tracy came across like they have a lock on what will happen.
When I saw her name on this, I thought is she genuine or controlled opposition? I read a couple of pieces years ago of hers. I was never interested or impressed. Just a personal observation. I have zero idea either way.
She's so ignorant
A friend of the Brunsons posted this on TS after contacting them. I don't know. Maybe Tracy just is not really qualified to read a legal document like this. I always thought she was good at research.
She has been great at reading the Lake documents and others. Painstaking. Knows her stuff.
I found the article by DC undercover to be reasonable, sensible and well written.
People don't have to agree, but I thought it was good.
This response, I find less so. Argumentative, assertions, attacking.
Accusing the authors ad hominem is not a good start. "unless you did not care for the truth"
"you do not know the mind of SCOTUS and you acted like you do"
"A rigged election is an act of war"
The response is highly emotional, indicating a LOT of attachment to the person's own viewpoint, and hence lacking in objectivity.
Reading between the lines, it seems pretty clear to me who's really making reasoned, objective arguments here, and who isn't.
Agreed. I found the article enlightening, and intended to bring us back to a realistic expectation of the process. Let's hope they don't march into the chamber and claim "This is war!" and start pointing fingers at anyone that disagrees with them.
Here's the GAW post of the article.
https://greatawakening.win/p/16ZqPbRnN9/-the-truth-about-the-brunson-cas/
TY fren!