This hour's breaking story (AS PREDICTED in censored thread) :
Hero Customer Who Shot Armed Robber At Houston Taco Joint Ordered To Face Grand Jury By Soros-Funded DA. : https://www.zerohedge.com/political/hero-customer-who-shot-armed-robber-houston-taco-joint-ordered-face-grand-jury-soros
Soros DA kept letting felon out on no bail, now, as predicted, is going to imprison the hero.
= = = = = = ==
The first and ONLY full video of the hero in a fast rising POPULAR thread was deleted mysteriously by a centrist-leaning gun-hating mod.
https://cdn.videy.co/Cwc0nakG.mp4
It WAS in this very fast rising +64 thread : https://archive.ph/Y9YvJ
= = = = =
Sordid details of this despicable act to bury 2 threads about this hero at the restaurant, is covered in this thread :
= = = = = =
Does Soros have influence on this site?
Damn people, AGAIN let me point out that Texas requires all shoots to go before the county Grand Jury, we let a jury of your peers decide if you did anything wrong or not.
The double damned corrupt HPD and the corrupt lesbian DA are NOT recommending charges, but once the guy turned himself in and talked to the cops he had to be referred under Texas Law. Referred without prejudice, no one thinks he did anything incorrect, unlawful or improper. It was a good shoot, and the Grand Jury will also decide it was kosher, no charges will be recommended. The Grand Jury cannot indict because no laws were broken in this FAFO. It was a good shoot.
Under our law he had an absolute right to protect himself and others present from the visible mortal danger - he did not know the gun was fake until after he ended the threat. And he has the absolute right to continue using deadly force against the threat until he is certain the threat has been removed.
It does not matter how many times he fired or anything, once the legal threshold for using deadly force is met he can use whatever force is necessary to end the threat. He did, and under our law it must go before the Grand Jury for his peers to review. No charges can be had tho, it is formality.
Fellow Texan endorses every word.
Same from this Texan. I do have one concern that he will be indicted for fleeing the scene. Houston is a liberal city. The GJ could easily decide that if he thought his shoot was lawful he would've stayed and waited for the cops instead of fleeing like a criminal would. Remember a GJ can indict a ham sandwich. I don't have time to check the penal code to see if there is a statute about fleeing after the use of deadly force, but even if there isn't there should be.
I also believe the guy was extremely lucky he didn't kill anyone outside the restaurant. There were at least 2 bullet holes in the glass entry door.
I'm conflicted. I carry every day and I believe you should be able to stop a threat. I also believe this guy was an idiot and didn't have any idea he was letting rounds leave the restaurant where anyone could've been injured or killed. If you can't control your shots and don't know what is behind the threat perhaps you shouldn't shoot so many times.
If he would've just waited for the police he would be in no jeopardy, or they may have asked him to take a gun safety course to brush up on his situational awareness or something. He didn't, and I think he may be in trouble.
To be clear - I see no charges for the shoot or death, nor should there be. I think he will have to answer for his actions afterwards.
To be honest, kind of scary considering how hard they've been pushing to warp our sense of morality.