4 rockets on launch pads at the same time for 4 booms? Posts at 1:30 and 1:36 are pretty interesting to read. Links in comments.
(media.greatawakening.win)
💥 B- B- B- B O O O M 💥
You're viewing a single comment thread. View all comments, or full comment thread.
Comments (62)
sorted by:
Lol. So you are insinuating those rockets are not real and deep fakes?
No, the rockets are real, a rocket does get propulsion as long as there's something for the rocket to push against.
What is a rocket pushing against in a vacuum?
The exhaust.
Except the exhaust is just expanding away, there's nothing substantial enough for the thrust to be maintained.
Wait. If humans havent been to space and everything gathered on space is a deep fake how could you propose space is a vacuum. That would require data and confirmation of status and physic properties in order to deduce a near vacuum environment exists outside the atmosphere. Oh is the atmosphere real too? Or that is also a deep fake?
You're using fallacious reasoning here. I never said it was deep fake, you have been trying to push that argument on me as though I was making that argument. This is reddit-tier thinking.
I notice you're also dodging the question.
Are you suggesting that space is anything other than a rounding error from a true vacuum, as stated in any scientific book on the subject?
I didnt suggest anything. I've been brainwashed since kindergarten and a reddit tier smooth brain. I'm asking the really smart, knowledgeable Twitter tier people questions. So I can learn.
But since it was stated space travel requires other technology yet space is being presented as a conditional value status of a vacuum. The next glaring question is how did this proposition become a presented status in the discussion. How was space determined to be a near vacuum state?
The rocket is little more than a hot exhaust vessel. The rocket's hot gases are exhausted through a nozzle, with the design intent that outgoing exhaust pushes against itself (hence, the conical shape of the nozzle).
The shape of the nozzle balances the atmospheric pressure, such that the rocket doesn't turn into a Pipe bomb, this is why at high altitude the nozzle exhaust appears to flare outwards, while on the pad the flames appear to go straight down.
This is also why we have multi-stage rockets, with the shape of the nozzle designed for operations in lower atmospheric pressure situations. Hopefully, in the not-too-distant future, this can be bypassed by using the Aerospike approach, which removes these constraints and achieves high efficiency without regard to vacuum or atmosphere.
Exactly, the exhaust action pushes the air and the equal and opposite reaction is the thrust. When there's no air, there's nothing to maintain that thrust.
On a smaller scale, this can be demonstrated using ionic wind for thrust, if placed in a vacuum chamber, once the air levels drop so does the thrust because there's not enough material to push.
Wrong. Pressure is differential. We are at 1 atmosphere now. That’s why we would “blow up” in space
Inside the rocket is 1,000-1,200 psi of hot gas around 5,000 F. Rockets are insulated with rubber (solid rocket boosters) as steel melts at 1,700
At the nozzle throat, the exiting gas is supersonic, but rapidly slows down when expanding into the nozzle cone. So that’s where the thrust is. Not against the atmosphere; against exhaust gasses immediately behind the nozzle throat
https://www.grc.nasa.gov/WWW/k-12/rocket/nozzle.html