For Veterans of this fight we know that this is attempt #5 of stopping the cabal in the US. However, this time (current op) we have the upper hand. Trump becoming POTUS for 4 years is proof of that. That never should have happened with the cabal appearing to control EVERYTHING since 2004. The existence of worldwide allies (setup by Trump) all working together against the cabal makes this time different.
Historical reference to the other 4 Awakenings/Cabal Takedown operations
- 1968-1976 (8 years); Started with Nixon win in 1968, Ended by contrived Watergate and forced resignation, attempted assassination of Ford, and rigged election 1976 by Soviet infiltrators to place Soviet agents Carter/Mondale into White House. See parallels to 1976-1981 here: https://greatawakening.win/p/15HvUQJhdG/move-and-countermove-19731986-in/; Note a key White Hat "event" with the death of Lyndon Johnson in January 1973 a couple days after Nixon inauguration (it likely was an execution for his role in JFK).
-
1980-1985 (5 years); Started with Reagan election, ended with GW Bush/CIA takeover July 14, 1985 and mass amnesty and importation of illegals/communists to change the demographics ahead of planned end of Soviet Union (too much damage done by Reagan to SU for cabal to recover so they imploded it and pivoted to European Union as successor). Reagan to Bush power transfer: https://greatawakening.win/p/15HvGQtCI2/george-hw-bush-was-made-presiden/c/; One could argue that this one went until 1987 when a cabal-engineered market crash (under direction of GHW Bush/CIA) wiped out most of Patriot assets in retaliation for BCCI takedown. Also, some clear White Hat activity with the death of Nelson Rockefeller in 1979.
-Prince was clearly part of this Mini-Awakening on the music/media/entertainment front and 'Purple Rain' was likely a reference to exactly that: https://greatawakening.win/p/16ZqiGQo5B/purple-rain--a-great-awakening-a/c/
-
1994-2001 (7 years); Started with Republican takeover of the House, attempted takedown of Clinton/CIA crime families, forced implosion of Gore/Green1/Enron carbon trading scheme; ended with 9-11 false flag and national bankruptcy (and re-collateralization of national debt). History of US collateralization: https://greatawakening.win/p/15JUCbSJWq/a-brief-history-of-united-states/
-Some details on what was going on with IBM, AT&T, MSFT, and GOOG as they were all successively deployed as Deep State weapons against Americans: https://greatawakening.win/p/15HvL9na6D/finkle-is-einhorn-google-is-micr/
- 2008-2013 (5 years); Started with crashing of cabal financial system, destruction of cabal banks, Tea Party, Occupy Wall Street, and Anonymous movements; ended with Obama rigged election, unleashing of propaganda, and Obama purge of military and his mass murder campaign against conservatives using MS-13 operatives. Also note targeting of conservatives, churches, etc. with full weaponization of IRS against Patriots. This one may have started in 2007 as lots of weird stuff started happening publicly in Spring of 2007.
-
2016-now (in year 7); Started with election of President Trump, ending with restoration of our national AND state Sovereignty, control of our money and labor, and a Worldwide Great Awakening to counter the UN/WEF Agenda 2030 Great Reset and Depopulation initiatives.
-The setup for this current operation appears to have started immediately after some triggering event in late 2012 or early 2013. Something happened to the real Joe Biden around this time period. It is possible that Obama got flipped, replaced, or controlled at some point in 2014 or 2015. Something happened to the real Hillary Clinton in late 2016 that prevented her from running again in 2020 as was expected. Several additional markers during the 2013-2016 timeframe look like counter-infiltration bread crumbs and setting up for the Trump victory in 2016.
-Patriots were recording all cabal operative activities (probably through Motorola and Blackberry devices) since 2008. It is unclear if Obama was able to delete all copies of this data prior to 2013. Both companies later broken up/destroyed by the Deep State for their anti-cabal operations.
If you look closely you can see elements of these previous operations in the current operation. Here are 5 examples:
A. 2017-present Crowdsource intelligence analysis and data gathering appears to be built on top of the groundbreaking work of the Anonymous and Wikileaks organizations of the 2008-13 era. In the form of patriots.win and greatawakening.win it has been coupled with a "social media" type interface to allow more efficient and user-friendly interaction while still allowing offline archiving and storage of information. This "cabal intelligence network neutralizer" was the last key piece needed for success, imo.
B. 2021 Music being used as a weapon to help wake up the normies similar to Prince and others 1981-1985. Such as this with 1980s era frequencies: https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=s37x2VSZrLw
C. 2022-23 Very public side effects of forced vaccination creating vaccine hesitancy/caution that leads to eventual suspension of weaponized vaccines such as occurred in March 1977 with the Swine Flu vaccine suspension: https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/books/NBK219595/
D. 2023 House of Rep. control similar to "Contract with America" that went into effect in 1995 after big engineered Red Wave in 1994 mid-terms (note that it was a hidden Red Wave this time to justify replacement/control of Republican leadership.); Timing of MAGA Senate control might be deciphered by looking at 1994-2000 time period. https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Contract_with_America
E. 2024 or 2028 Election of MAGA President Trump with a landslide victory such as Reagan in 1980 or Nixon in 1972; 2024 might look like 1924 or 1824 (Andrew Jackson) with Electoral College split 3 or 4 ways. It appears that elections may be legit in at least 27 states by 2024 election, but may take until 2028 to get fixed in 48 states. https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/1824_United_States_presidential_election
God wins, always!
Note that there appear to be other major operations against the cabal, especially during WW1 and WW2, but it appears that JFK setup the Q organization (with help from Eisenhower?) to permanently monitor and counter all cabal activities in the US. So prior to JFK they may not have been called "Q Operations".
'Q' is military intel as in "What's the Q, today?", says a military commander to his scouts in the daily battlefield briefing; with likely origins pre-Revolutionary War military lingo.
Nixon was, imo, during his entire presidency, absolutely controlled opposition. I don't think people appreciate how much power the Cabal has. Their control is, or at least was (hopefully), total. Was Nixon always compromised? I don't know, possibly, possibly not. Some of his pre-president moves seem pretty anti-Cabal. I assert he was absolutely controlled opposition even then, I'm just not sure if he knew he was controlled opposition, though his concession to JFK in 1960 after obvious cheating suggests to me he may have known.
With controlled opposition it is difficult to tell. Once you appreciate how much controlled opposition there is however, you allow yourself to see the obvious compromises. There must be those who push agenda's against the Cabal. Since there must be those that do so, it makes sense to control them. The only obvious truth, when looking into history, is that The House Always Wins.
By the time Nixon became President however, I am (from what I've seen so far) convinced he was controlled opposition and knew it. All of his moves post-appointment were perfectly aligned with the Cabal agenda, even if they appeared to be "against."
Nixon's move to the petro-dollar was undeniably a victory for the Cabal plan. It wasn't a huge victory, it was really more like "the final nail in the coffin." Many of Nixon's moves were such. His moves in the Cold War, Vietnam, China, etc. were all Cabal victories, all completely in line with David Rockefeller's foreign agenda.
Gerald Ford, Nixon's VP, was 100% a Rockefeller crony from the get-go. He was a member of the Council on Foreign Relations and the Trilateral commission, who made it into office with nary a vote, then appointed Nelson Rockefeller as VP, again, with nary a vote. I don't think Nelson Rockefeller ever wanted to be Pres. however. I think he was there to clean up shop in the messy C_A disclosures happening at the time, and neuter the Church Commission, both of which he accomplished. He was there to help transition out of the war with Vietnam, direct cold war efforts, and close the book on the JFK fiasco, all of which were causing so many issues with the public. He did what it took to put in the structures that would keep the C_A out of the limelight for future endeavors. He also helped finish solidifying most of the structure of government we have today with respect to social engineering (schools, health care, welfare, etc.) all of which had been started by him in the 1940s (he created the HEW e.g.). He was there to set up the necessary framework for the Carter era that followed who was also a Rockefeller (Trilateral commission) agent.
This whole analysis misses what controlled opposition is. Many of the issues can be shown to be such actions, intentioned to make it look like they are "against the Cabal," when in fact they are the opposite. So many of the actions that appear to be against, can be shown, through who is doing it, and where they are getting their funding, to be a fiction to placate the opposition, and create a false enemy.
I understand cabal threatened to murder his daughter. Plus Nixon’s wife may have been placed as “handler” as I suspect Jackie was for JFK and Betty was for Ford.
JFK was a member of the Cabal, through and through (by birth, and what he did in his life prior to being President). However, he also did things that were more against the Cabal agenda than any other President. Why he did that I don't know. I personally think he actually was acting against the Cabal, though some of his actions were both for and against them, so it's hard to tell. Some of his actions were decidedly against however. Rather than the Cabal winning through those actions (as so many other actions I've found in history that appear to be "against" but are actually for), they needed to be shut down and memory holed. This is the only thing that makes me think there was more to JFK than just controlled opposition.
For example, his speech against "secret societies" was actually, when you read the whole thing, in support of the media keeping the government's secrets. It was in support of the C_A doing things without public oversight. But that wasn't stated until the end, and the entire first part seemed to be so completely against it. The speech taken in total just didn't have the required rhetoric to support the conclusion. It's as if it were two different speeches, where the first part was a cut and paste for a completely different speech. The speech he actually gave created a very long sound bite that made it sound like the opposite of the conclusion. I think that was an intentional Fuck You to the Cabal, both pushing their overall agenda in his speech, while at the same time revealing their efforts in the shadows.
Whether or not his wife was his handler, that's a definite maybe for me, but he was absolutely a member of the Cabal (controlled elite aristocracy) from birth. I think he just may have rebelled. I don't think he would have done so on his own though. There is just too much entrenchment. This suggests to me that there may have been a larger effort to help him do so. It could very well be that JFK's win over Nixon was itself a Q-type effort, and that is why Nixon conceded. Who knows.
As for Ford, his entire resume screams Rockefeller agent. You don't get to be a member of the CFR, and especially not the Trilateral Commission and a Bohemian Grove regular unless you are completely compromised, as in, a blood sucking pedovore. He didn't need a handler.
The important point most people forget when they talk about someone being a member of the Cabal is that the Cabal is not one singular entity. Even going back to the founding of America, it was done by the "Cabal" which had both humanist and anti-humanist factions in it, and in the end I would argue that the constitution contained text that really set back the anti-humanists, but also omitted some text (specifically about forbidding central banks) that left the door open for the anti-humanists.
Even during Kennedy's time, its conceivable that the humanist faction was active. Only after killing Kennedy did the anti-humanists start believing that they had won (hence the Q mark on his grave. Q stands for victory, and the anti-humanists were sending a message that the had won this victory by killing JFK. However, this pushed the humanist faction underground, and lead to reclaiming the Q - aka victory)
This is not correct, even though a cursory glance at the speech makes you think so.
His actual point was a much harder message. He wanted to make sure the media does not leak his (government) plans to fight the Cabal. However, he also did not want stop this through censorship or to be expanded to censor everything.
So the entire point of the speech was to talk about the monolithic and ruthless conspiracy he was fighting, and how important it is to consider this like any real war and show self restraint in reporting our plans to the enemy, but at the same time not go to the extent of censorship or suppressing truths.
Handy link to the full transcript
Opening paragraph is actually referring to the idea of secrecy being repugnant because thats how the Cabal operates.
In second paragraph he expresses his worry that the increased need for security will be used as an excuse for extensive censorship.
In the third paragraph, he asks the publishers to refrain from revealing information helpful for the enemy because this is a time of war.
In the 4th paragraph, he explains how even though a "war" has not been declared our very way of life is under threat.
In the 5th, he asks the press not to wait for a war declaration before self imposing restriction on not exposing secrets that will help the enemy.
And finally he explains who the enemy really is - the monolithic and ruthless conspiracy that attacks us covertly.
He then talks about atleast one specific case where national security secrets were leaked to the advantage of the Cabal.
And finally ends by appealing to the media to do the right thing, but he would never impost any restrictions on them officially.
Either you are basing this conclusion on other things JFK said somewhere other than this speech, or you are injecting your own desires into what he said, because I can find no way to derive this conclusion from the rhetoric of the speech itself. On the contrary, he is clearly talking about the Soviet Union as "the enemy." It isn't ambiguous. No one listening to this speech at the time is going to take it to mean anything else. The "secrets" he is referring to in the second half of the speech which the media were to keep quiet on is the supposed clandestine war that was occurring as part of the Cold War. He even calls examples out by name:
He is specifically talking about news leaked into the press about American satellites which the USSR found out about through the press. This rhetoric (and information) helps promote the Cold War narrative, and encourages the press to keep silent, and for the American people to appreciate media silence with relation to C_A efforts. This appreciation we should have as to why "Freedom of the press" should be reduced was sold under the guise of "National Security" which is the selling point of all such fuckery.
He even says all these things explicity:
The entire Cold War narrative was all theatre, at least at the top level, so the second part of the speech wasn't calling out the Cabal at all, but was rather promoting keeping quiet on the US's own clandestine efforts (AKA the C_A), which were more against the American people than the USSR.
I suggest you read it again. I assert that none of what you are saying is in there is actually in there past the first few paragraphs. Like I said, it's as if it were two different speeches. If you think that what you are proposing is contained within the rhetoric (again, after the first few paragraphs), point it out. I assert the second 2/3rds or so is all about keeping the actions of the C_A quiet because they were (supposedly) the front line in the "Cold War" (which was a total contrivance).
Correct. Both Kennedy and Ford families (as well as Lincoln btw) were cabal families. Individuals from cabal families are selected to be “double-agents” intentionally, imo. This is using cabal tactics against them as cabal loves to infiltrate organizations working against cabal and then redeploy to do cabal bidding.
The main reason for this is to confuse people so we cannot figure out who is on which sides based on what they say. But actions give it away.
One interesting counterpoint is that Gerald Ford was adopted and not actually part of the Ford family bloodline. In fact, I still don't know who he really was.
I appreciate what you are saying, and I agree that actions give it away, however, I think you may not appreciate that many actions that appear to be against the Cabal are actually for them, which is very difficult to appreciate except by what happens after, or perhaps by understanding what is left out, i.e. what remains hidden during "disclosure."
For example, all of Ford's actions were pro-Cabal. Every single one. You seem to be suggesting the opposite, both in your OP and in your responses. The same can be said for Reagan. GHWB didn't take over in the second term, he took over with the assassination attempt. All of Reagan's actions were pro-Cabal. There were no "Q" actions going on there. I think it's possible that Reagan didn't start his Presidency compromised (at least not completely compromised), but he was assassinated two months in. He was compromised at least since that moment. No Q-type event went on with Reagan, as there were no actions that went against the Cabal, nor could there have been. I really don't think you appreciate how much control they have.
The "Republican takeover of the House" during Clinton was not a Q effort, that was controlled opposition. They needed to air the dirt, and it needed to be done in a controlled fashion. That is what that was. This is not about "Republican v. Democrat." BOTH are completely compromised and always have been. The Republican's that led the Charge against Clinton were doing exactly what they were told to do by the Cabal.
Everyone, especially in any position of power, is a part of the cabal until they're not.
I think we put too much stock in are they or aren't theyit's not an either-or. Some turn on the cabal, some stay. Some work both sides and never really decide who they're working for.
The point is, JFK certainly was cabal to reach the presidential perch. However, it's clear in his actions he was making moves against the cabal. It's easy to see why they did what they did.
Nixon too. Nixon started pushing against but was put in line. A lot of his "secret" recordings reveal this.