Don't worry, Timmy isn't too bad in this one. He doesn't have a lot to add for most of it with the exception of the convo they have about big tech for a bit. He jumps in and starts talking about Trump and stuff, mildly annoying. Also his voice is almost gone, he sounds really hoarse. Perfect timing! 🤣
He doesn't do his usual OMG GUEST MAKING POINTS - EVERYONE DONT 4GET MEEEE type of bloviating both you and I can't stand. 😭😉
I appreciate when Tim counters them with a moderate slant, actually.
I don't appreciate when he denies what's been in his face for years because he's afraid of YouTube (or DoJ, ironically) suppression.
Even Gaetz downplayed things like these classified documents, and that personally annoyed me as it reeks of ye olde Republican "don't play their games, when they go low we go high" bullshit. Did not like that bit.
Overall a good interview though, and it was kind of amusing seeing Luke trying to be anti Trump and Gaetz just brushing it off.
Luke also handled being brushed off about it pretty gracefully too, which I appreciate.
Even Ian was okay this one.
As far as fence sitters go, I do tend to prefer Tim. I don't even know that he's much of a fence sitter, as he clearly strongly believes in personal liberties and not murdering babies, but also agrees with the leftists on stuff.
Neither side really understands what it means to be moderate anymore, and any true centrist will tell you that we are screeched at by both sides at one time or another, and Tim rolls with it so good for him.
What I mean to say as a TL;DR: Good interview. Tim really not that bad. Tim sometimes annoying when he tries to deny a deep state and then describes, perfectly to a T, a deep state.
Tim doesn't get money directly from YouTube, as he doesn't run ads.
Tim gets money from people willing to subscribe to his site, the same as Crowder, because they believe he's worth supporting.
Tim is one of the most "average Joes" we've actually got in current politics.
Being supported by viewers doesn't make him a grifter or anything of the sort, and furthermore how the hell do you think we actually build an alternative media in the first place?
Not getting paid directly by YT is entirely besides the point.
However, you’re not completely accurate here — Tim’s channel is fully monetized through:
superchats (viewer support on the YT platform), and
Google AdSense (a share of ad revenue TY receives from prerolls and other ad buys throughout creators’ content)
How do you think Tim stays on TY, continue being monetized, and have his podcast suggested in the algorithm to non-subscribers?
Tim is VERY careful about playing by Youtube’s content rules — that what makes it possible for him to continue to receive superchats and a percentage of AdSense.
Ask yourself why creators like Salty Cracker aren’t monetized on YT and have had to use alternate monetization platforms to receive viewer support? Because he dgaf about YT’s content rules.
I’m not saying Tim’s the devil or he’s DS, or whatever — because honestly I actually get the sense that he knows the truth, but refuses to state it publicly because he fears being branded a conspiracy theorist.
So instead he’ll constantly refute ANY topic related to election fraud, and dutifully regurgitate mainstream talking points that there’s no evidence of it, and that Biden was legitimately elected. Same goes for any other case of election fraud.
Why are you being so petty? I listen to Tim's podcast a lot and while he is no "anon" they sure do discuss a lot of conspiracy theories, corruption in the government, election fraud, crimes against children, crazy woketards etc. They have tons of conservative guests like MTG, Gaetz, libs of TikTok and many more. Topics like aliens, transhumanism, the fakery of climate change are being discussed regularly. His podcast has actually opened some of my normie acquaintance's eyes to what's going on.
Bottom line: we don't need anyone to believe in Q in order to share the truths Q revealed. Q was just the messenger, it's the message itself that matters.
Also the digital battlefield has a lot of different battalions, and the Q angle is just one such battalion. Alt media is extremely important to our future. Alt media is what we substitute in for the mainstream.
Keyboard warriors willing to tear down the people who are actually doing something are absolutely more destructive than when they skirt the YouTube rules.
It's sometimes clear he doesn't believe some of the things he says, e.g. things like there being no deep state cabal. Because he often then describes the actions of said deep state cabal.
Tim is definitely good for us. If he weren't, people like Gaetz wouldn't be there. People always going to be shitty towards centrists though, it's just magnified because of how tribal today's politics have gotten.
Don't worry, Timmy isn't too bad in this one. He doesn't have a lot to add for most of it with the exception of the convo they have about big tech for a bit. He jumps in and starts talking about Trump and stuff, mildly annoying. Also his voice is almost gone, he sounds really hoarse. Perfect timing! 🤣
He doesn't do his usual OMG GUEST MAKING POINTS - EVERYONE DONT 4GET MEEEE type of bloviating both you and I can't stand. 😭😉
I appreciate when Tim counters them with a moderate slant, actually.
I don't appreciate when he denies what's been in his face for years because he's afraid of YouTube (or DoJ, ironically) suppression.
Even Gaetz downplayed things like these classified documents, and that personally annoyed me as it reeks of ye olde Republican "don't play their games, when they go low we go high" bullshit. Did not like that bit.
Overall a good interview though, and it was kind of amusing seeing Luke trying to be anti Trump and Gaetz just brushing it off.
Luke also handled being brushed off about it pretty gracefully too, which I appreciate.
Even Ian was okay this one.
As far as fence sitters go, I do tend to prefer Tim. I don't even know that he's much of a fence sitter, as he clearly strongly believes in personal liberties and not murdering babies, but also agrees with the leftists on stuff.
Neither side really understands what it means to be moderate anymore, and any true centrist will tell you that we are screeched at by both sides at one time or another, and Tim rolls with it so good for him.
What I mean to say as a TL;DR: Good interview. Tim really not that bad. Tim sometimes annoying when he tries to deny a deep state and then describes, perfectly to a T, a deep state.
It’s not due to laziness. Tim abides by his Youtube master’s rules.
Because the money’s worth more than the truth to him.
He’s a man of very questionable character.
Tim doesn't get money directly from YouTube, as he doesn't run ads.
Tim gets money from people willing to subscribe to his site, the same as Crowder, because they believe he's worth supporting.
Tim is one of the most "average Joes" we've actually got in current politics.
Being supported by viewers doesn't make him a grifter or anything of the sort, and furthermore how the hell do you think we actually build an alternative media in the first place?
Not getting paid directly by YT is entirely besides the point.
However, you’re not completely accurate here — Tim’s channel is fully monetized through:
superchats (viewer support on the YT platform), and
Google AdSense (a share of ad revenue TY receives from prerolls and other ad buys throughout creators’ content)
How do you think Tim stays on TY, continue being monetized, and have his podcast suggested in the algorithm to non-subscribers?
Tim is VERY careful about playing by Youtube’s content rules — that what makes it possible for him to continue to receive superchats and a percentage of AdSense.
Ask yourself why creators like Salty Cracker aren’t monetized on YT and have had to use alternate monetization platforms to receive viewer support? Because he dgaf about YT’s content rules.
I’m not saying Tim’s the devil or he’s DS, or whatever — because honestly I actually get the sense that he knows the truth, but refuses to state it publicly because he fears being branded a conspiracy theorist.
So instead he’ll constantly refute ANY topic related to election fraud, and dutifully regurgitate mainstream talking points that there’s no evidence of it, and that Biden was legitimately elected. Same goes for any other case of election fraud.
Sorry, but there’s no honor in that
Why are you being so petty? I listen to Tim's podcast a lot and while he is no "anon" they sure do discuss a lot of conspiracy theories, corruption in the government, election fraud, crimes against children, crazy woketards etc. They have tons of conservative guests like MTG, Gaetz, libs of TikTok and many more. Topics like aliens, transhumanism, the fakery of climate change are being discussed regularly. His podcast has actually opened some of my normie acquaintance's eyes to what's going on.
Bottom line: we don't need anyone to believe in Q in order to share the truths Q revealed. Q was just the messenger, it's the message itself that matters.
Didn't Q eventually advise readers to focus on the Q message without referencing the messanger?
Also the digital battlefield has a lot of different battalions, and the Q angle is just one such battalion. Alt media is extremely important to our future. Alt media is what we substitute in for the mainstream.
Keyboard warriors willing to tear down the people who are actually doing something are absolutely more destructive than when they skirt the YouTube rules.
It's sometimes clear he doesn't believe some of the things he says, e.g. things like there being no deep state cabal. Because he often then describes the actions of said deep state cabal.
Tim is definitely good for us. If he weren't, people like Gaetz wouldn't be there. People always going to be shitty towards centrists though, it's just magnified because of how tribal today's politics have gotten.