Let's not forget the Irish and Chinese immigrants who were working on the railroad... Treated like second rate humans, but they have the wrong skin color so lets just not talk about that too
I cannot stand Cleese.. He was part of the lefty Camb/Oxford establishment university mob that killed off all of the traditional pub/club comedians in the 60s,70s.
He helped spawn current times..including his own demise.
I wonder if he is one of those millionaire Communists who love socialism only because his wealth protects him from having to deal with its negative impact.
They (the useful idiots) all have similar perspectives until those "above" or around them no longer need them or decide (because of their treacherousness, self-interest and unreliability) they are "liabilities" that need to be "removed".
Remember Python's Argument Sketch? I'm pretty certain that some of their material was based on their own characteristics. Like Cleese arguing pointlessly, just being contradictory because that's the way he is.
I've known people like this is in real life. They don't seem to hold any actual opinions on things. They just take whatever stance that will cause the most friction.
Yer needs a history lesson, Barbary slave trade... Slavic slave trade ... both of which went on for thousands of years....
Let's not forget the Irish and Chinese immigrants who were working on the railroad... Treated like second rate humans, but they have the wrong skin color so lets just not talk about that too
I cannot stand Cleese.. He was part of the lefty Camb/Oxford establishment university mob that killed off all of the traditional pub/club comedians in the 60s,70s. He helped spawn current times..including his own demise.
I wonder if he is one of those millionaire Communists who love socialism only because his wealth protects him from having to deal with its negative impact.
They (the useful idiots) all have similar perspectives until those "above" or around them no longer need them or decide (because of their treacherousness, self-interest and unreliability) they are "liabilities" that need to be "removed".
Remember Python's Argument Sketch? I'm pretty certain that some of their material was based on their own characteristics. Like Cleese arguing pointlessly, just being contradictory because that's the way he is.
I've known people like this is in real life. They don't seem to hold any actual opinions on things. They just take whatever stance that will cause the most friction.
Never heard of the cuck.