Wait, what I said may or may not be true because of how many people believe it? Is that how truth is measured? I don't expect you to believe me. In my short response I gave no evidence. The evidence is a huge exposition, which I am working on. Part 1 is here. Regardless however, I made points, and you didn't address them, rather you gave an argument on credentials. Credentials have nothing to do with any investigation into the truth of a thing.
I never said I didn't like him. On the contrary, I loved his work. My research led to different conclusions on the timing and origin of certain events.
Why do people think that disagreement in investigation means "not liking?"
Wait, what I said may or may not be true because of how many people believe it? Is that how truth is measured? I don't expect you to believe me. In my short response I gave no evidence. The evidence is a huge exposition, which I am working on. Part 1 is here. Regardless however, I made points, and you didn't address them, rather you gave an argument on credentials. Credentials have nothing to do with any investigation into the truth of a thing.
I expected better from you.
I like Bill Still. Good luck with the book.
I never said I didn't like him. On the contrary, I loved his work. My research led to different conclusions on the timing and origin of certain events.
Why do people think that disagreement in investigation means "not liking?"
Because many people on both sides get caught up in cults of personality where you're not allowed to contradict their favorite idol.
Lol.
It was a rhetorical question, and I got an unexpected, good solid answer. Thank you. You made my day. (I'm not hard to please.)