Jesus is real
(media.greatawakening.win)
You're viewing a single comment thread. View all comments, or full comment thread.
Comments (93)
sorted by:
Have you any idea that before jesus died for sinners..so did Mithras? And fifteen other saviours.. crucified on trees or crosses..descended into hell...the Vedic jesus Krishna fed thousands with little cakes from a small basket..did all the same miracles as did all the other saviours....raised the dead.walked on water...rose from the dead after three dayees..had twelve disciples..born Dec 25th..etc etc was the redeemer..the lamb of god etc etc he was he way the truth and the life....
Why do you think believing in fables makes you a good girl?
Do some research...you can find all the evidence on the internet
This is the same pop atheism that was getting pushed by the Zeitgeist documentary and the new atheism movement in the early 00s. Biblical scholars do not give this any credence, and I'm including the atheist scholars such as Bart Ehrman. English puns and tenuous connections do not make Jesus=Krishna=Mitra, and the theory is not taken seriously by anyone except the NA movement- which is part of the Social Justice movement, by the way.
If you're interested in how Christianity's icons and mythos were influenced by other, previous religions, look up Sol Invictus and the manner in which Constantine turned Christianity into the state religion of Rome.
Speaking as someone who is entirely pragmatic about religion, you must understand that Christianity is the antidote to globohomo, and even Q encourages prayer.
https://www.gutenberg.org/files/38600/38600-h/38600-h.htm
Try reading the truth instead of evading it
You need to do some serious research. It is a matter of historical fact there have bee. Sixteen documented saviours..all saying the same things..all purporting to save man from his sins.
Prayers are something else...you don't need a man to have been tortured to death on a cross to save you from your sins...a scapegoat..to pray.
The problem with myths is that they are myths. There is no historicity or evidence or documentary/textual chain of custody. So we don't know when such tales were written (certainly much later than claimed) nor by whom.
Such is not the case with the New Testament accounts of Jesus. They were written by the people whose names are put to them. They were written when they were claimed to have been written. They have scores of corroborating witnesses. They have endured centuries of hostile criticism. They are backed up by archeology. There is an unbroken chain of custody. They are confirmed by contemporary (in other words, ancient, historical, from that period) 3rd-party scholars and historians. They are confirmed by the lives of those who told the tales and by the lives of the disciples of those who told the tales, and they are confirmed by millions of modern believers who daily experience God's presence in their lives, myself included.
Don't waste your time with this antichrist.
You are kidding yourself. Even the church admit there is no documentary evidence for jesus..but there is for the other redeemers
don't confuse god with a redeemer tortured and murdered so you can go to a mythical heave.n when you die.
Where is the source material for the claim that Socrates had wise men from the east deliver frankincense and myrrh? The Anacalypsis was written in the 1800's by a different rabid atheist. I find no original source material for the claim. Maybe you should do some research on each of the claims made in this link. As for me, I know that Jesus is real.
It's a curious thing, but not uncommon. I wouldn't really bother engaging with uk9994 on this topic, as she is convinced she is right and appears to be deeply satisfied with her own interpretations, and appears quite unable to recognize some of the biases and emotional programming that underlies them.
Part of the lies that work on some people are to generate a projected interpretation of Christ that is <undesirable> and then establish that as the sticking point, on which all future rejections can work.
Example, the idea that "Jesus needed to be murdered and tortured so that sinful people could go to heaven". I mean, that really is archaic, primary school (elementary school) conceptualization of Christ and is purpose. And, obviously, it's an ugly one.
And because it's so crude and crass and obviously immature, it provides a great foundation for UK9 to reject, blame and reaffirm her own interpretations (and antithetical interpretations delivered by others to her).
It's exactly like seeing the corruption and evil that infiltrated and undermined so much of the Catholic Church, or the faults and flaws of religion as a whole, and using that as a justification for why Communism is the great liberator - a 19th century idea that gave so much power to Marxism.
Tell me that the sun is just an illusion! Tell me that when I breathe, I'm NOT breathing air. Tell me that every day I live my life, I'm not really here or that I don't really have a family. Reality is experienced, and cognized, and resonates.
If you have experienced Jesus on some level, you can no more denier the reality of him than you can of the existence of the sun, ths stars, or of your own breathing lungs.
But whereas these things are experiences of an objective material reality, a reality virtually forced upon us by the fact that we cannot always keep our eyes, ears, nose, skin, etc, closed, contrastively, one is able to either open or close one's mind, and thus, certain realities that can only be experienced subjectively can be forever kept out of our mind and our experience.
That's why pursuit of and experience of the truth is such a challenging thing. It requires personal choice and responsibility, and a willingness to face the internal challenges that come with recognizing the flaws and faults underlying my own personality and heart.
Appeal to antiquity fallacy and not true.
When you wake up dead, you will then know how wrong you were. By then it will be to late. 🙏4u
That makes no sense....look at history...look at the documented facts instead of denying truth
That falsehood would negate the trinity of the Godhead. Try harder.
Tartaria makes all “official” historical documents like the ones you refer to suspect. How do you know the histories you believe are not false?
Have you looked into the suppressed history of Tartaria and the Mud Floods. We have actual photographs of this stuff, which I think are generally more trustworthy than written text. If they are able to hide the existence of an entire nation, then they are willing to lie about anything. That means the “evidence” that “disproves” The Bible is suspect, especially when we see their Satanic background. I don’t trust almost anything they are telling us, and the way they do everything in their power to undermine Christianity suggests there is something there they not only believe in/know about, but fear.
Try listening to documented researched data...archaix.com
There is only one way, one truth and life, Jesus. You should lay off whatever it is you are smoking shill.
All the other saviours in history say the same thing...do some research..stop being so ignorant about the history of the world