Trump and Elon both make a post on 1/16/23 @ at 2247 creating a zero delta. Now look at Q post 2247. No coincidences.
No Q-incidences!
Trump post on 1/16/23 @ 2247
https://truthsocial.com/@realDonaldTrump/posts/109702495721978394
Elon post on 1/16/23 @ 2247
But the example shown in Q-Post #2247 is exactly opposite of what you're saying is the definition of a 0D. Trump's timestamp in the Q-Post is 12:05:52am and the corresponding Q-Post has a timestamp of 12:06:09am. According to at least Q-Post #2247, Trump posted first then Q posted. This is shown as a literal definition example of a 0D.
Was there somewhere else that Q specified that Trump should be posting after a Q-Post to make it a 0D? I'm not an "old-timer" like you and several others here so I'm confused by what you're saying.
I'm no Q expert, but certainly Trump posting after Q seems to be a more secure indication of the link between Q and Trump because, as u/CQVFEFE points out, people could have an alert setup when Trump posts and then posts shortly afterwards. The reverse, ie Trump having an alert when Q posts which causes him to create a twitter post shortly afterwards, only confirms the link between Q and Trump.
I assume your question is why would Q show an example of the opposite in one of their posts. I don't have an answer for that.
Agreed regarding the security of the order. That's why the example provided in an actual Q-Post seems odd. Also, I wasn't here when Q was posting so don't know if there was any discussion of this back then and/or if Q either stated or implied a particular order in the 0Ds. If he/they never specified then we can't say this recent occurrence of Trump-Musk "coincidentally timed/synchronized" messages does not count as comms. Anon CQVFEFE stated "it has to be" in a specific order and I'm just trying to determine if I've missed some rule, implied or stated, that would agree with this.
On the other hand, the old "no outside sources" comes into play. There are no coincidences. The one facet pushing this towards a signal of some sort is POTUS posting at 22:47 - and I'm assuming here that this is the time he actually posted and not some other time that someone else retrieved it or such. I've gotten caught up before with assuming a timestamp which was not correct, not sure I fully understand these mechanics of the timestamps.