I've never seen this on the ""National"" Debt Clock....
I wonder what it means, or signifies....
(media.greatawakening.win)
🔍 Notable
You're viewing a single comment thread. View all comments, or full comment thread.
Comments (39)
sorted by:
That is a curious happening. According to those readings, the amount of US Dollars required to purchase a barrel of oil, an ounce of silver, or an ounce of gold is $0.00. This would indicate an economic state wherein either oil, silver, and gold have lost their value, or the dollar has gained exponential value in relation to oil, silver, and gold. This is actually inverse to what these numbers should read. It should be that $0.00 worth of oil, silver, or gold could purchase a Federal Note.
This likely is a bug in their system, though I am curious where they pull their data from, and if that data is actually provided in real time, or an estimation based on a computer algorithm or program of some sort. There certainly could be more to this than meets the eye.
I'm no economist, but these numbers would seem to indicate a state of hyper deflation of the US Dollar wherein its purchasing power has temporarily increased to infinity. In this hypothetical scenario, the computer readings may be a result of an error in the parameters set by the Debt Clock program.
I've heard economic theory regarding the preceding signs of a collapse of the U.S. Dollar. One of the prominent theories is that just prior to the complete collapse of the Federal Note we will see rapid hyper inflation for a short direction; a short squeeze of the dollar, followed by a complete loss of its value. This is rather like what happened in the film Margin Call based upon the 2008 financial crisis wherein the hedge funds offloaded their garbage assets onto the market. I can definitely see the Cabal creating the economic conditions necessary to offload their worthless U.S. Debt Notes prior to a shift to their "Great Reset" Central Bank Digital Currency.
For those who wish to verify for themselves:
https://www.usdebtclock.org/#
A quick inquiry from Chat GPT produced the following analysis:
It doesn't mean what you think it means.
It's a ratio of year on year m2 supply vs. gold mined etc.
If m2 supply is lower than last year then this is effectively zero.
u/simon_says is probably the best inhouse expert who can tell us what is the significance of shrinking M2 supply.
Hmm . . .
Like I said, I'm no economist.
Another query from Chat GPT gave me the following:
Based upon this information, this is still not a non-happening. Unless this interpretation and conclusion is wrong.
That's interesting, thanks.
I don't really understand the significance of the m2 supply lowering, I just thought it represent Quantative Tightening, rather than Quantative Easing.
i.e. they are printing less money this year than last, but not by a massive amount from the charts I looked at.
Well . . . Chat GPT could be totally off on all of this.
I asked it a follow up question about your statement:
The output was:
This didn't really give me a relevant answer, so I asked the following:
The output was:
This seems to align with your explanation of the happening.
I inquired further though:
The last reply was:
So I'm getting conflicting explanations from the GPT, unless I am not understanding the right terminology to specify to GPT, and therefor receiving inadequate or inaccurate feedback.
I think you might be right in your assessment after all, but it would still be worth keeping an eye on this situation. It also could be the case that GPT has algorithms in place to deliberately obfuscate certain subject matter, thereby producing inconclusive search results.
Why are you asking chatgpt for an interpretation instead of reading and understanding the charts yourself?
M2 is declining, i.e. Tight monetary policy, decrease in dollars available. When M2 is negative, the ratio of "newly printed money this year" to "silver ounces mined this year" is going to look like this:
(Amount of dollars printed this year)/(Silver ounces mined this year)
Let's say, for simplicity's sake. Zero money is printed and one ounce of silver is mined.
What is 0/1?
Result is 0.
That's all it means. Literally. Now, what are the implications of monetary tightening? That's tbe more interesting question.
Stop using apps and bs "AI", or you'll risk more than relying on google and GPS.