Brian Cates is wrong in his predictions frequently. He was also anti-Q for a long time, then he was parallel to Q in his assessment of events while claiming to be unfamiliar with the drops, and now he's openly a Q guy.
I don't think he's nefarious or suggesting he be ignored, he just has a poor track record of predictions and bad takes, so I don't trust his opinion very much.
I can fault him for a lot of things. He's turned into a "tell you what you want to hear" profiteer.
He comes to sites like this, either pumps stuff he likes out as personal opinion, or dismisses with vitriol. Both instances he secures a reaction from his consumer.
I’m wrong sometimes. If you’ve ever been wrong just give me a thumbs up. I believe this particular trap could be true. Trump said he thought the folders that classified documents are distributed in meetings looked cool. They are tossed when the doc’s are collected so he kept some of the empty trash because he thought they were cool. Come on man. They saw the folders in the file cabinet marked “place cheese here “ so they raided. Embarrassing
Did you predict the election would be stolen and biden being the white house. His forecasting is mainly on point and close to the signal you should be watching. Trust no one; verify everything
He also forecasted that Trump's big announcement in November would be major declassification. It was a campaign announcement.
Trust no one, verify everything indeed.
I don't trust Brian Cates, he's got enough wrong so far to be worthy of caution. That doesn't mean I don't listen to what he has to say, but it's best to approach his theories with a healthy amount of skepticism.
I like the theory, it checks a lot of boxes. I'm dubious of Brian Cates though.
May I ask why you find him suspect? He seems to just share his take. Seems to use his platform and popularity to bring attention to important topics.
Brian Cates is wrong in his predictions frequently. He was also anti-Q for a long time, then he was parallel to Q in his assessment of events while claiming to be unfamiliar with the drops, and now he's openly a Q guy.
I don't think he's nefarious or suggesting he be ignored, he just has a poor track record of predictions and bad takes, so I don't trust his opinion very much.
"Brian Cates is wrong in his predictions frequently."
Anons are wrong in their predictions frequently.
Just an observation...
Anons aren't being paid.
Sounds like a guy who is open minded and changed his opinion as new info came in. Can't fault him for that.
I can fault him for a lot of things. He's turned into a "tell you what you want to hear" profiteer.
He comes to sites like this, either pumps stuff he likes out as personal opinion, or dismisses with vitriol. Both instances he secures a reaction from his consumer.
I’m wrong sometimes. If you’ve ever been wrong just give me a thumbs up. I believe this particular trap could be true. Trump said he thought the folders that classified documents are distributed in meetings looked cool. They are tossed when the doc’s are collected so he kept some of the empty trash because he thought they were cool. Come on man. They saw the folders in the file cabinet marked “place cheese here “ so they raided. Embarrassing
With how crazy things are - is anyone really good at predictions these days?
If you were to ask yourself to interpret the Q drops and how they would unfold in the next 5 years how accurate would you be?
I'm not making 6 figures doing it, he is.
My accuracy is irrelevant since I don't make a living from making claims and/or predictions.
Did you predict the election would be stolen and biden being the white house. His forecasting is mainly on point and close to the signal you should be watching. Trust no one; verify everything
He also forecasted that Trump's big announcement in November would be major declassification. It was a campaign announcement.
Trust no one, verify everything indeed.
I don't trust Brian Cates, he's got enough wrong so far to be worthy of caution. That doesn't mean I don't listen to what he has to say, but it's best to approach his theories with a healthy amount of skepticism.
I think you defined it better than I did in some other comments. The matter of fact approach is probably what I find the most disagreeable.