Why Is The U.S. So Openly Advertising A Ship Carrying Tanks To Ukraine? Can anyone sense a False Flag?
(mobile.twitter.com)
🏳️ FALSE FLAG 👮
You're viewing a single comment thread. View all comments, or full comment thread.
Comments (71)
sorted by:
( CAN SOMEONE TELL ME THIS ??? ) - Exactly "What Port" ? in exactly "What Country" are US Military Cargo Ships going to pull up to , to drop off all these tanks and military equipment ??? ( Plus US Service Men ) I looked at a world map, and i can not see one logical tactically safe place to unload that bulk of equipment. ( and personnel. ) NEXT - the closest "Open Ocean" port is either Northern Germany , or Turkey in the Mediterranean. THEN - it would be a 1500 mile journey from Germany ( through mountainous terrain ) or a 1000 mile journey from Turkey ( through mountainous terrain ) just to get to the very western / or , southern side of the Ukraine. " THAT SHIT AIN'T GONNA HAPPEN". LASTLY - ??? What happened to that "The MILITARY is the Only Way" rhetoric ??? I'm kinda questioning weather or not ??? if the US Military is gonna be available to have the back of the US Citizen - to raise the middle finger to the Cabal / Black Hats / NWO - when they are busy over in Eastern Europe shuffling boat loads of all that was mentioned above. ??? Am I Missing Something ???
I don't follow. Any ship can unload at Gdansk in Poland, and the tanks can go by railway to Ukraine. No mountains involved, as far as I know.
I wouldn't put it past the Russians to delegate an attack sub to tail the cargo ship and see if anyone else is also tagging. If there is an "allied" submarine (U.S. or U.K.) that torpedoes the ship for a False Flag attack, it would be a super consternation if the unsuspected Russian follower were to torpedo the assailant submarine. What would the assailant say? Couldn't say a word. Wasn't supposed to be there.
Or the Russian sub could go on active sonar all the while, announcing to everyone that it was there---and obtaining a solid track on any other follower. (I would also suspect that the U.S. Navy would detail a destroyer to follow the ship, if only to "verify" the False Flag and provide aid and assistance to a stricken ship. Tidy scripting.)
And, just gaming this in my head, the Russians should send along a surface ship to be an "impartial observer" of whatever happened. Capturing any sonar tracks by the way. Better yet, the Russian ship could conduct an anti-submarine attack on the assailant. How could any U.S. trailing ship object?
I think the best way to spoil a False Flag event is to add extra actors on stage, wearing brass knuckles, turn up the lights, and fill the auditorium with spectators and cameras.
I like your thinking here. I'm sure the Russians have gamed it through. They are likely to have more options than the west in some ways. It's their home area, they have good surveillance and electronic countermeasures. They have quiet subs and better missiles. Finally, I think they have better (sane) strategists.
Im no scholar when it comes to geography ( especially Europe ) but i don't see a path / open ocean route - that "Gigantic US Cargo Ships" can get any farther East - via shipping routs , than Germany. There is no access or major port in Poland ( as far as i can tell. ) The Baltic Sea - " Is Cut Off" and there is no access to Northern Poland.
The Baltic Sea exits through the Denmark Straits into the North Sea,.Poland has a Port at Gdansk,.where the Tanks can be railroaded through Poland to Ukraine
three largest ports in Poland - Gdańsk, Gdynia, and Świnoujście
-which is most like the Route that the US Cargo ship with the Tanks will take,.
Are we looking at the same map? From Wikipedia: "Seaports exist all along Poland's Baltic coast, with most freight operations using Świnoujście, Police, Szczecin, Kołobrzeg, Gdynia, Gdańsk and Elbląg as their base. The Port of Gdańsk is the only port in the Baltic Sea adapted to receive oceanic vessels." If you can get into the Baltic to ship goods to Germany, going a little farther to Poland is no problem at all. Why would they send cargo in a ship that could not make passage? That makes no sense.
" Makes no Sense" - ( your last statement. ) Once again - I asked ??? What " O P E N OCEAN P O R T " - not some land locked "SEA PORT" that ships have to navigate a rat maze for access into - and be left "VULNERABLE" and trapped in a box with no possible route for quick escape - in fear of attack. Secondly - all that US Military cargo has to be protected and transferred - via rail - for many many miles , on rail lines , and rail equipment that "ARE NOT DESIGNED" to transport massive US Military equipment. ??? What quantity of US Military "Equipment & Personnel" would be required for such an operation ??? and once again - ( Trust in the US Military / The Military is the only way ) This would mean that our military is in direct correlational in creating world tension and posturing in an act of aggression and act's of WAR directly squarely at Russia.
" ALL THIS" makes me contemplate and question "ALL" that is going on around us.
lol, what? Why do you think there are 10k US troops around the port in Gdansk? It's the largest port in the area and one Putin would LOVE to own. They ship 50 TRILLION tons of crap every year. We also drop tons of stuff into huge German ports and rail it into Ukraine very easily.
Responding to your " L O L " - Once again - I asked ??? What " O P E N OCEAN P O R T " - not some land locked "SEA PORT" that ships have to navigate a rat maze for access into - and be left "VULNERABLE" and trapped in a box with no possible route for quick escape - in fear of attack. Secondly - all that US Military cargo has to be protected and transferred - via rail - for many many miles , on rail lines , and rail equipment that "ARE NOT DESIGNED" to transport massive US Military equipment. ??? What quantity of US Military "Equipment & Personnel" would be required for such an operation ??? and once again - ( Trust in the US Military / The Military is the only way ) This would mean that our military is in direct correlational in creating world tension and posturing in an act of aggression and act's of WAR directly squarely at Russia. " ALL THIS" makes me contemplate and question "ALL" that is going on around us.
permalink report delete edit reply
are you ok?
You do realize that "some land locked sea port" is actually the deepest water port in the area and way deeper than anything else on the open ocean side of the EU.
You clearly know nothing about shipping or the military.
You are 100% correct. ( i am clueless. ) That is the entire premise of my response to this post. ( I was asking ??? ) On my IGNORANT side of the street - your response seems to justify my question. Germany seems to be the only viable option. ??? Why would our military engage in such actions . ( and vulnerabilities ? )
The most convenient port would be Odessa, except that I doubt that Erdogan would let that ship through the Dardanelles. So yeah, there is the issue of transport overland (and mountain ranges, on transporters), which makes the convoy a flaming target - not comfy. Furthermore, there is the FF issue, to provide NATO with a reason to put official boots on the ground.
I believe this 'moving' military vehicles thingie is too visible - everyone is now looking. What are they really doing? As another anon just pointed out: Why move them from USA when those vehicles are all over Europe? But then many of the European tanks/APCs are in a shocking state of disrepair - and supplying those to Ukraine would mean depleting stocks in the rest of Europe, only to have them blown up in the first week. The donor countries then would be 'defenseless against Russian aggression' even though they already were defenseless with that rotting equipment, and Russia does not intend anything of the sort.
Why is the US military not putting its foot down, with this nonsense of foreign entanglements? In the end, what they are doing is covering Biden's ass, who was meddling with large amounts of money in Ukraine. Why is the military putting up with it?
It's a head scratcher all right.