Why Is The U.S. So Openly Advertising A Ship Carrying Tanks To Ukraine? Can anyone sense a False Flag?
(mobile.twitter.com)
🏳️ FALSE FLAG 👮
You're viewing a single comment thread. View all comments, or full comment thread.
Comments (71)
sorted by:
I don't follow. Any ship can unload at Gdansk in Poland, and the tanks can go by railway to Ukraine. No mountains involved, as far as I know.
I wouldn't put it past the Russians to delegate an attack sub to tail the cargo ship and see if anyone else is also tagging. If there is an "allied" submarine (U.S. or U.K.) that torpedoes the ship for a False Flag attack, it would be a super consternation if the unsuspected Russian follower were to torpedo the assailant submarine. What would the assailant say? Couldn't say a word. Wasn't supposed to be there.
Or the Russian sub could go on active sonar all the while, announcing to everyone that it was there---and obtaining a solid track on any other follower. (I would also suspect that the U.S. Navy would detail a destroyer to follow the ship, if only to "verify" the False Flag and provide aid and assistance to a stricken ship. Tidy scripting.)
And, just gaming this in my head, the Russians should send along a surface ship to be an "impartial observer" of whatever happened. Capturing any sonar tracks by the way. Better yet, the Russian ship could conduct an anti-submarine attack on the assailant. How could any U.S. trailing ship object?
I think the best way to spoil a False Flag event is to add extra actors on stage, wearing brass knuckles, turn up the lights, and fill the auditorium with spectators and cameras.
I like your thinking here. I'm sure the Russians have gamed it through. They are likely to have more options than the west in some ways. It's their home area, they have good surveillance and electronic countermeasures. They have quiet subs and better missiles. Finally, I think they have better (sane) strategists.
Im no scholar when it comes to geography ( especially Europe ) but i don't see a path / open ocean route - that "Gigantic US Cargo Ships" can get any farther East - via shipping routs , than Germany. There is no access or major port in Poland ( as far as i can tell. ) The Baltic Sea - " Is Cut Off" and there is no access to Northern Poland.
The Baltic Sea exits through the Denmark Straits into the North Sea,.Poland has a Port at Gdansk,.where the Tanks can be railroaded through Poland to Ukraine
three largest ports in Poland - Gdańsk, Gdynia, and Świnoujście
-which is most like the Route that the US Cargo ship with the Tanks will take,.
Are we looking at the same map? From Wikipedia: "Seaports exist all along Poland's Baltic coast, with most freight operations using Świnoujście, Police, Szczecin, Kołobrzeg, Gdynia, Gdańsk and Elbląg as their base. The Port of Gdańsk is the only port in the Baltic Sea adapted to receive oceanic vessels." If you can get into the Baltic to ship goods to Germany, going a little farther to Poland is no problem at all. Why would they send cargo in a ship that could not make passage? That makes no sense.
" Makes no Sense" - ( your last statement. ) Once again - I asked ??? What " O P E N OCEAN P O R T " - not some land locked "SEA PORT" that ships have to navigate a rat maze for access into - and be left "VULNERABLE" and trapped in a box with no possible route for quick escape - in fear of attack. Secondly - all that US Military cargo has to be protected and transferred - via rail - for many many miles , on rail lines , and rail equipment that "ARE NOT DESIGNED" to transport massive US Military equipment. ??? What quantity of US Military "Equipment & Personnel" would be required for such an operation ??? and once again - ( Trust in the US Military / The Military is the only way ) This would mean that our military is in direct correlational in creating world tension and posturing in an act of aggression and act's of WAR directly squarely at Russia.
" ALL THIS" makes me contemplate and question "ALL" that is going on around us.
What are you talking about? Gdansk is a main seaport on the Baltic Sea, which is not a constrained passage. There is no "rat maze." If you are willing to accept sea transport to Germany, there is nothing else to worry about when traveling a few more miles to Gdansk (the former German Danzig). After that, conventional rail transport is more than adequate to convey military equipment. I don't understand your capitalization and exclamation points. Consult a map, for heaven's sake.
As for "vulnerable," there is no other word for cargo ships, which has been a known fact for hundreds of years. There is no such thing as "quick escape," as cargo ships are not "quick."
How old are you? I guess you have no idea how much military materiel and personnel were transported exclusively by ship in World War II. Often as closely as possible to where combat was taking place. No railroads across the Atlantic Ocean to North Africa. No railroads to Sicily and mainland Italy. No railroads across the Mediterranean Sea, Red Sea, Persian Gulf, or Indian Ocean. No railroads to the beaches at Normandy. No railroads to Brussels, after the beachhead was established. Not to mention no railroads across the Pacific Ocean. My father was in the Navy Armed Guard manning the convoys, all through the war. They went everywhere. What you are talking about would be dismissed as nonsense.