And when you send this to people, here's the only section they'll highlight:
Authors' conclusions
The high risk of bias in the trials, variation in outcome measurement, and relatively low adherence with the interventions during the studies hampers drawing firm conclusions. There were additional RCTs during the pandemic related to physical interventions but a relative paucity given the importance of the question of masking and its relative effectiveness and the concomitant measures of mask adherence which would be highly relevant to the measurement of effectiveness, especially in the elderly and in young children.
There is uncertainty about the effects of face masks. The low to moderate certainty of evidence means our confidence in the effect estimate is limited, and that the true effect may be different from the observed estimate of the effect.
The only reason the flu "disappeared" during COVID is because they PCR test cannot tell the diff between cold flu or COVID. They are all essentially the same thing, but our govt wanted all those flu numbers in the COVID category. Are there still people who refute this?
Sorry, I Have Major Problem with Your Chosen Article As part of the Heading Begins With "ABSTRACT"!
adjective
ab·stract | \ ab-ˈstrakt , ˈab-ˌstrakt
Definition (Entry 1 of 3)
1a: disassociated from any specific instance
//an abstract entity
b: difficult to understand : ABSTRUSE
//abstract problems
c: insufficiently factual : FORMAL
//possessed only an abstract right
2: expressing a quality apart from an object
//the word poem is concrete, poetry is abstract
3a: dealing with a subject in its abstract aspects : THEORETICAL
//abstract science
b: IMPERSONAL, DETACHED
//the abstract compassion of a surgeon
— Time
4: having only intrinsic form with little or no attempt at pictorial representation or narrative content
//abstract painting
Now I know why Russia made a beeline to take northern Kiev, Kharkiv, and Kherson in March of 2022 and then retreated from those areas. Looking at the map, there were at least 5 weaponized bio-labs located there. Russia most definitely have the goods out of these these bio-labs. And it appears the Russians obtained over 20,000 documents.
Well, the masks DID stop all flu variants. If only we had figured that out earlier we never would have needed an annual flu vaccine. Duh. Why weren’t we just wearing masks all year, every year, to prevent the flu, since the method was so effective in 2020 and 2021?
Edit: apparently the sarcasm wasn’t obvious enough so here you go: /s
From Brownstone.org in December 2021: More than 170 Comparative Studies and Articles on Mask Ineffectiveness and Harms
And when you send this to people, here's the only section they'll highlight:
Authors' conclusions The high risk of bias in the trials, variation in outcome measurement, and relatively low adherence with the interventions during the studies hampers drawing firm conclusions. There were additional RCTs during the pandemic related to physical interventions but a relative paucity given the importance of the question of masking and its relative effectiveness and the concomitant measures of mask adherence which would be highly relevant to the measurement of effectiveness, especially in the elderly and in young children.
There is uncertainty about the effects of face masks. The low to moderate certainty of evidence means our confidence in the effect estimate is limited, and that the true effect may be different from the observed estimate of the effect.
“The studies didn’t show what we wanted them too, so they weren’t great science. We need better science to show the outcome we want.”
cdc said this in 2005
This is a culmination of 78 different studies, including multiple trials since 2019 involving Covid. Reading the article helps put this in perspective
Read the article?! WTF. Get out of here!
The only reason the flu "disappeared" during COVID is because they PCR test cannot tell the diff between cold flu or COVID. They are all essentially the same thing, but our govt wanted all those flu numbers in the COVID category. Are there still people who refute this?
I'm surprised Cochrane hasn't been infiltrated by deep state stooges yet. They are one of the few respectable scientific organizations remaining.
More huge than Fauci stating the same thing under oath? Or Tedros standing at the WHO podium admitting the same thing?
Great question
Excuse me, but why didn’t they do this 2 years ago?
mask bookmark
Sorry, I Have Major Problem with Your Chosen Article As part of the Heading Begins With "ABSTRACT"!
adjective ab·stract | \ ab-ˈstrakt , ˈab-ˌstrakt
Definition (Entry 1 of 3) 1a: disassociated from any specific instance //an abstract entity b: difficult to understand : ABSTRUSE //abstract problems c: insufficiently factual : FORMAL //possessed only an abstract right 2: expressing a quality apart from an object //the word poem is concrete, poetry is abstract 3a: dealing with a subject in its abstract aspects : THEORETICAL //abstract science b: IMPERSONAL, DETACHED //the abstract compassion of a surgeon — Time 4: having only intrinsic form with little or no attempt at pictorial representation or narrative content //abstract painting
Now I know why Russia made a beeline to take northern Kiev, Kharkiv, and Kherson in March of 2022 and then retreated from those areas. Looking at the map, there were at least 5 weaponized bio-labs located there. Russia most definitely have the goods out of these these bio-labs. And it appears the Russians obtained over 20,000 documents.
Well, the masks DID stop all flu variants. If only we had figured that out earlier we never would have needed an annual flu vaccine. Duh. Why weren’t we just wearing masks all year, every year, to prevent the flu, since the method was so effective in 2020 and 2021?
Edit: apparently the sarcasm wasn’t obvious enough so here you go: /s
Nope...still a virus and masks still powerless. Thanks for playing.
Hey downvotes. Its called sarcasm. Jeez