The Fight Club DVD’s « FBI WARNING » was prophetic. It’s from 1999.😳
(media.greatawakening.win)
You're viewing a single comment thread. View all comments, or full comment thread.
Comments (41)
sorted by:
Fuck semantic word games, you know what I meant.
I get it; but that is the fucking issue...the few domesticate the many to behave according to norm, hence to use words suggested to them by the few for communication, while ignoring that suggested words versus suggested words doesn't represent communication, but miscommunication, hence a "conflict" of reason.
What was written on the Georgia Guide-stones? https://pic8.co/sh/htSzPr.jpg
The few can only claim meaning if the many give credence ..
the few domesticate the many to behave
The few comprehend further that a partial (living) within a whole (process of dying) cannot own anything, only utilize everything temporarily. The few suggest claims to tempt the many to want to possess aka to want to hold onto aka to claim as their own. Meanwhile; the more the living cling to the process of dying, the faster they die, hence loosing their hold.
The few utilize meaning (suggested information) to distract the many from predefined meaning (perceivable inspiration)...the former tempts one to want to hold onto; while the latter implies the need to adapt by resisting wanted temptations.
Aka giving creed aka giving belief; faith; submission; agreement; consent by free will of choice to the suggested information by others.
a) "free" will of choice within the "dom" inance of balance aka free-dom, can only be domesticated if the "free" willingly ignores the "dom" for the suggested choices of others. Slavery represents ones choice to submit to the choice of another, while ignoring the dominance of balance.
b) choice can only exist at the center of balance, hence in-between need/want...others can tempt choice to choose want over need, which tempts one into want vs not want conflicts aka imbalance through ignorance of balance.
c) being implies as partial within what the whole has, hence drawing from the whole to grow self, while struggling with the temptation to want to hold onto it.
Example; being (living) on a treadmill (process of dying)...the more one adapts, the stronger ones resistance becomes, while simultaneously the temporary one is being drained by the ongoing whole, hence struggling with the temptation to give up struggling.
Unlike the treadmill... the living cannot increase or decrease the process of dying, nor can one step off.
Seems unnecessarily convoluted dude. Is the purpose of that to strike a certain wizened tone, or something? Could be you don't care, but in case you can handle constructive criticism, I would say to quit with the hyphens and parentheses. It feels gas lighty. Otherwise, nice work Anon! Keep it up! 👍😀