Doesn't hurt to be precise. When you get in the habit, you notice when other people are obfuscating. And another way that's done is with words of indefinite quantity: some, a great many, the majority, etc. If it can be counted or measured then the exact number can and should be used.
For a good understanding of political policy word orientation, read “Policy Paradox: The Art of Political Decision Making” Revised Edition 2001 by Deborah Stone. It really gets down to the nuts and bolts of how, why, and the certain wording and meanings of policy building/making.
This is the tactic employed by Fauxi ever since the bad old days of AIDS to enable his flip-flopping and scare-mongering of the masses, now copied by MSM whores around the globe to drive clickage.
If depopulation is considered as "improving public health outcomes"... then yes.
climate change is that public health concern so yes, it would. it would reduce their complaint of carbon and c02.
Doesn't hurt to be precise. When you get in the habit, you notice when other people are obfuscating. And another way that's done is with words of indefinite quantity: some, a great many, the majority, etc. If it can be counted or measured then the exact number can and should be used.
Heaven forbid there be any honest communication. What fun would that be?
For a good understanding of political policy word orientation, read “Policy Paradox: The Art of Political Decision Making” Revised Edition 2001 by Deborah Stone. It really gets down to the nuts and bolts of how, why, and the certain wording and meanings of policy building/making.
That should be mandatory for any drug lol. And it should be proven before it hits the shelves.
This is the tactic employed by Fauxi ever since the bad old days of AIDS to enable his flip-flopping and scare-mongering of the masses, now copied by MSM whores around the globe to drive clickage.