Things aren't looking good for DeSantis. "No way?"
(media.greatawakening.win)
You're viewing a single comment thread. View all comments, or full comment thread.
Comments (53)
sorted by:
If Trump is putting a spotlight on it, then it's operationally true.
Primaries are around the corner, and something like this definitely shows just how far Trump is willing to go to take DeSantis out of the race. I suspect this was a shot across the bow.
What do you mean by "operationally true"?
I think your use of the word "definitely" is pretty out there. So many assumptions. I'd prefer to see a more reasoned, balanced interpretation based on what anons know: that there is a war between DS and the good guys, and that disinfo and kayfebe and smoke and mirrors are a BIG factor, ESPECIALLY in any thing the normie world looks at, such as the 2024 race.
Operationally True: For the purposes of an active Intelligence Operation's success, certain cells of the military and wider populace are on a strict "need to know basis." Not to be confused with malicious withholding of the truth. Some specifics of the overall narrative, whether established by the insurgents or counterinsurgents, are inconsequential to a successful mission. Therefore, such topics are considered distractions which work against the credibility of the movement. In such cases, it is best to defer to the "established narrative" even though it may be false, if only to promote active research into more pressing and consequential topics of discussion.
One such example would be an alive JFK Jr. It would be inconsequential to the operation if JFK Jr. is alive, because operationally he is dead. The operation does not require him in any actionable capacity, so is therefore a drain on resources for the wider populace involved in the movement to care about. It makes no sense to expend resources in an effort to convince people he is alive when the operation does not call for it.
Additional examples include the colloquial "White Lie". Q refers to this as "necessary disinformation."
Say a vagrant comes to you asking you to hide him from some gangsters. You hide him under the floor boards. The gangsters then arrive asking if I've seen a vagrant go by. Telling the truth has no immediate consequence for you, however it is in the better interest of a potentially innocent individual that you lie now then determine for yourself the crimes, if any, the vagrant is guilty of. Deference of judgement to a later time permits you to turn him over to the gangsters, to law enforcement, or to just let him go, whereas letting the gangsters take him may produce the most morally negative outcome. For the time being, the "operationally true" statement is to say you could not help the gangsters in finding the vagrant. It is a lie, but one that maintains the current potential outcomes in your favor to ensure the best outcome can be arrived at.
College students... living away?
It says when he was a HS teacher so Id assume it is HS girls.