The main point I like to make is that to generate an earthquake that released as much energy as a Tsar Bomb, you dont have to input energy equivalent to this.
Think about a very tall jenga tower. You do a minor flick with your finger at the bottom, and the whole tower collapses releasing orders of magnitude more energy than you put in.
The theories I find believable talk about vibrations that can resonate with certain "strings" below the earth, causing those vibrations to cascade and displace, in the process causing an earthquake that is far more powerful than the vibrations used.
I find that theory quite believable.
For correct question is "is it possible to have a technology that could be used to trigger earthquakes, are certain areas under certain conditions ?"
It maybe HAARP, it may be vibrations, it make be shaped charges inside the earth, or anything else.
The answer to that would be "I cannot imagine why such a technology is not possible"
For the record, I even predicted a false flag in Turkey just 9 days before.
If the implication is that this earthquake is a coincidence, I am not buying it.
1st Law of Thermodynamics: you have to get the energy from somewhere. It doesn't come from nothing. The cases of resonant structural failure result from a continuous input of power, adding up to the energy necessary to trigger the collapse. It doesn't happen until you get to the breaking point.
But pay attention to the balance. The jenga tower has energy put into it by its construction (gravitational potential energy).
The "vibrations can do anything" line of thinking is no theory. It is magical thinking. They can do a lot, in certain circumstances, but they are not magic.
Every earthquake is a coincidence. There were earthquakes before there was technology. So also, volcanic eruptions.
It did a pretty convincing magic trick to make lots of people disappear instantly though. However, they never came back, so not sure that counts as a 'trick'.
The main point I like to make is that to generate an earthquake that released as much energy as a Tsar Bomb, you dont have to input energy equivalent to this.
Think about a very tall jenga tower. You do a minor flick with your finger at the bottom, and the whole tower collapses releasing orders of magnitude more energy than you put in.
The theories I find believable talk about vibrations that can resonate with certain "strings" below the earth, causing those vibrations to cascade and displace, in the process causing an earthquake that is far more powerful than the vibrations used.
I find that theory quite believable.
For correct question is "is it possible to have a technology that could be used to trigger earthquakes, are certain areas under certain conditions ?"
It maybe HAARP, it may be vibrations, it make be shaped charges inside the earth, or anything else.
The answer to that would be "I cannot imagine why such a technology is not possible"
For the record, I even predicted a false flag in Turkey just 9 days before.
If the implication is that this earthquake is a coincidence, I am not buying it.
1st Law of Thermodynamics: you have to get the energy from somewhere. It doesn't come from nothing. The cases of resonant structural failure result from a continuous input of power, adding up to the energy necessary to trigger the collapse. It doesn't happen until you get to the breaking point.
But pay attention to the balance. The jenga tower has energy put into it by its construction (gravitational potential energy).
The "vibrations can do anything" line of thinking is no theory. It is magical thinking. They can do a lot, in certain circumstances, but they are not magic.
Every earthquake is a coincidence. There were earthquakes before there was technology. So also, volcanic eruptions.
Yeah this is the most logical way to view it. E=mc^2, it isn’t magic.
It did a pretty convincing magic trick to make lots of people disappear instantly though. However, they never came back, so not sure that counts as a 'trick'.
</bad_taste>