And all Italians are Mafia, by this logic. It is your fault to use the crimes of a few to blame all. This is collectivism, and it is a major intellectual and moral fault.
Just replace a word: "Coincidentally as always some White Man is behind slavery. That isn't our fault lol we can only point out what we see with our own eyes."
Why create unnecessary resistance to a truth with your word choice though? Why not be more precise is your verbiage? I like calling them JINOs. It fosters conversation, reduces knee jerk reactions, and bypasses the “antisemitism” verbal gambit. “No. These guys only say they’re Jews to deflect criticism.” “No I’m not antisemitic. I have no problem with Jews. I have a problem with Satanists/Communists/Zionists/Etc, who only say they’re Jews to avoid criticism.”
Why dig in your heels in the name of your truth when you can be so much more persuasive with a minor course correction?
So, according to your logic, all whites are condemned for the guilt of slavery?
You just don't want to face up to the logical fallacy you are wallowing in. It is interesting that your categorization of Jews as "white" is the categorical opposite of your previous statement: "Quit projecting the sins/crimes of the khazarians/jews onto white men." You are really trying hard to have your cake and eat it, too.
If you want to condemn "slavers," I'm with you. If you want to condemn "Jews," you are a simple anti-Semite.
You anti-Semites are almost humorous. In one breath you say "everyone knows that jews are not collectively as a people furthering the global agenda." And then immediately afterward you say "the jewish people are revolutionaries...they were kicked out of...many Countries." Except those who were not furthering the global agenda? Or just...all of them? (Curiously, you seem to have no understanding of the phenomenon of the Unbelieving Jew and what that inclines them toward, but I will let that go.)
Only "fucking morons" think that my point was to argue that white men are slavers. It was to construct an exact analog to the anti-Semite argument that all Jews are global monsters, to reveal the logical fallacy involved. ("Some A are criminals. Therefore, all A are criminals.") Or, to make it again clear, "Everyone knows that all Italians are not collectively as a people furthering the Mafia." Yep, we do know it. And we don't rant about "the Italian problem."
Generalizations can be valid or invalid depending on what they are. Anti-Semitic generalizations are mere racism. You really should move on.
And all Italians are Mafia, by this logic. It is your fault to use the crimes of a few to blame all. This is collectivism, and it is a major intellectual and moral fault.
Just replace a word: "Coincidentally as always some White Man is behind slavery. That isn't our fault lol we can only point out what we see with our own eyes."
Why create unnecessary resistance to a truth with your word choice though? Why not be more precise is your verbiage? I like calling them JINOs. It fosters conversation, reduces knee jerk reactions, and bypasses the “antisemitism” verbal gambit. “No. These guys only say they’re Jews to deflect criticism.” “No I’m not antisemitic. I have no problem with Jews. I have a problem with Satanists/Communists/Zionists/Etc, who only say they’re Jews to avoid criticism.”
Why dig in your heels in the name of your truth when you can be so much more persuasive with a minor course correction?
Chess, not checkers.
Would you mind explaining what you mean by that a bit more for me?
I'm not. You are projecting the sins of criminal Jews on innocent Jews.
Like I said, every case of slavery has a white man behind it. So, according to your logic, all white men are evil.
So, according to your logic, all whites are condemned for the guilt of slavery?
You just don't want to face up to the logical fallacy you are wallowing in. It is interesting that your categorization of Jews as "white" is the categorical opposite of your previous statement: "Quit projecting the sins/crimes of the khazarians/jews onto white men." You are really trying hard to have your cake and eat it, too.
If you want to condemn "slavers," I'm with you. If you want to condemn "Jews," you are a simple anti-Semite.
You anti-Semites are almost humorous. In one breath you say "everyone knows that jews are not collectively as a people furthering the global agenda." And then immediately afterward you say "the jewish people are revolutionaries...they were kicked out of...many Countries." Except those who were not furthering the global agenda? Or just...all of them? (Curiously, you seem to have no understanding of the phenomenon of the Unbelieving Jew and what that inclines them toward, but I will let that go.)
Only "fucking morons" think that my point was to argue that white men are slavers. It was to construct an exact analog to the anti-Semite argument that all Jews are global monsters, to reveal the logical fallacy involved. ("Some A are criminals. Therefore, all A are criminals.") Or, to make it again clear, "Everyone knows that all Italians are not collectively as a people furthering the Mafia." Yep, we do know it. And we don't rant about "the Italian problem."
Generalizations can be valid or invalid depending on what they are. Anti-Semitic generalizations are mere racism. You really should move on.