We just got through an ice storm here in Texas, so no, I’m not seeing the general climate getting warmer. Didn’t Trump Jr post on TS about how Mt Washington just hit record cold temps? I’ve also recently heard that the polar ice caps are growing to the utter bafflement of climate scientists.
The storms and events the Left “predicted” are all coming true.
Do you have any data to suggest that storms are getting worse or more frequent? Any data showing that said increase is man made? What are these other events you allude to?
Weather manipulation tech is not nearly as advanced as some think. At best they can make clouds drop their rain a little earlier than usual, and at best they get a 15% increase in rainfall per Scientific American. To make the leap that they can cause hurricanes and earthquakes is completely unfounded.
Turkey gets an earthquake after disagreeing with its NATO allies? That’s called correlation; it is not a valid data point. You have to prove that earthquakes are artificial. Do you even have a scientifically plausible mechanism for how earthquakes can be artificially induced? Furthermore, if the Turkey earthquakes were generated by other NATO members, then Turkey would consider that an act of war, split from NATO, and immediately side with Russia.
Vague speculation about DS capabilities, when it’s backed by conjecture and not verifiable facts, is not helpful. This kind of irrational speculation is why we keep getting inundated with Flat Earthers and NESARA scammers.
Here's a good example. Larger, more violent hurricanes are becoming more frequent. There are years where it spikes, but the trend overall is going up. If you cut out the vague speculation, I feel like most of the content around here would get removed. Somethings may not be objectively true, but they feel right and that's what's important.
If the DS did have control over the whether, they would use it subtly, sparingly. Anyone who tried to call them out on it would sound crazy, which is exactly their point.
Your chart does show an increase in tropical storm activity, but that alone does not establish why this increase is occurring. Any model attempting to explain this trend must be able to provide a mechanism for why it’s happening and an objectively falsifiable prediction for future cyclonic activity. Does the “it’s secret govt tech” model provide such a mechanism or predictions?
If you cut out the vague speculation, I feel like most of the content here would get removed.
Good, that would open up more room for things that we actually have facts and evidence for, like vaccine side effects and election rigging.
some things may not be objectively true but they feel right and that’s what’s important.
False, feelings do not substantiate anything. Feelings are incredibly subjective and have no bearing on reality. This exact argument is what the Left uses to justify their nonsense: “it feels right/good, therefore it must be right/good”. Ultimately this is the same argument that Flat Earthers use as well; all their arguments boil down to “I don’t like NASA and my model feels right, regardless of what evidence opposes it”.
Intuition is not a bad tool to use, but it cannot be your only tool. If there’s no evidence to support your intuition, or available evidence contradicts it, then your intuition needs to be re-examined.
We just got through an ice storm here in Texas, so no, I’m not seeing the general climate getting warmer. Didn’t Trump Jr post on TS about how Mt Washington just hit record cold temps? I’ve also recently heard that the polar ice caps are growing to the utter bafflement of climate scientists.
Do you have any data to suggest that storms are getting worse or more frequent? Any data showing that said increase is man made? What are these other events you allude to?
Weather manipulation tech is not nearly as advanced as some think. At best they can make clouds drop their rain a little earlier than usual, and at best they get a 15% increase in rainfall per Scientific American. To make the leap that they can cause hurricanes and earthquakes is completely unfounded.
Turkey gets an earthquake after disagreeing with its NATO allies? That’s called correlation; it is not a valid data point. You have to prove that earthquakes are artificial. Do you even have a scientifically plausible mechanism for how earthquakes can be artificially induced? Furthermore, if the Turkey earthquakes were generated by other NATO members, then Turkey would consider that an act of war, split from NATO, and immediately side with Russia.
Vague speculation about DS capabilities, when it’s backed by conjecture and not verifiable facts, is not helpful. This kind of irrational speculation is why we keep getting inundated with Flat Earthers and NESARA scammers.
Here's a good example. Larger, more violent hurricanes are becoming more frequent. There are years where it spikes, but the trend overall is going up. If you cut out the vague speculation, I feel like most of the content around here would get removed. Somethings may not be objectively true, but they feel right and that's what's important.
If the DS did have control over the whether, they would use it subtly, sparingly. Anyone who tried to call them out on it would sound crazy, which is exactly their point.
Your chart does show an increase in tropical storm activity, but that alone does not establish why this increase is occurring. Any model attempting to explain this trend must be able to provide a mechanism for why it’s happening and an objectively falsifiable prediction for future cyclonic activity. Does the “it’s secret govt tech” model provide such a mechanism or predictions?
Good, that would open up more room for things that we actually have facts and evidence for, like vaccine side effects and election rigging.
False, feelings do not substantiate anything. Feelings are incredibly subjective and have no bearing on reality. This exact argument is what the Left uses to justify their nonsense: “it feels right/good, therefore it must be right/good”. Ultimately this is the same argument that Flat Earthers use as well; all their arguments boil down to “I don’t like NASA and my model feels right, regardless of what evidence opposes it”.
Intuition is not a bad tool to use, but it cannot be your only tool. If there’s no evidence to support your intuition, or available evidence contradicts it, then your intuition needs to be re-examined.