I know all that. Lots of questions there. What are you insinuating? The aftermath of the areas I personally saw, miles and miles, surrounding where my mother lives all had spotty and random damage.
But alot of those are rural areas and are not house fires, they were forest fires with houses in the burn area. Significant damage, but out of all of it didnt see one place where steel was melted or concrete reduced to nothing. Most stone hearths were left standing. Cars and appliances heavily burnt compromised but wasn't turned to molten state.
Anyway I was responding to the line of comments about asphalt not compromised but everything burned and like people are idiots with no critical thinking. Was there some nefarious intervention to make the fires worse, maybe. I didn't see anything suggesting that other than severe forest fires destroying many homes in the process.
Forest fires where hearths were left standing and steel was left standing sounds like a normal forest fire or house fire at normal burn temperatures. Those are not uncommon.
But we are talking about the fires that didn't burn the forest. That didn't spread randomly. They were pinpointed burns that took out homes and vehicles and left grass, trees, and everything else just feet away standing. This is not possible unless something else was at play.
I hope you can spot the clear difference.
Do an internet image search for this: "what are directed energy weapons?"
Excerpt: This month, the Force awakens in theaters. Next month, a new force awakens in the New Mexico desert, where the Defense Department is to start testing a weapon worthy of “Star Wars” — a silent, invisible laser that needs just a couple of seconds to burn a hole in targets miles away.
“What it really boils down to is a silent weapon that nobody sees or hears,” said Lt. Gen. Bradley Heithold, commander of Air Force Special Operations Command (AFSOC, pronounced “AFF-sock”).
I know all that. Lots of questions there. What are you insinuating? The aftermath of the areas I personally saw, miles and miles, surrounding where my mother lives all had spotty and random damage.
But alot of those are rural areas and are not house fires, they were forest fires with houses in the burn area. Significant damage, but out of all of it didnt see one place where steel was melted or concrete reduced to nothing. Most stone hearths were left standing. Cars and appliances heavily burnt compromised but wasn't turned to molten state.
Anyway I was responding to the line of comments about asphalt not compromised but everything burned and like people are idiots with no critical thinking. Was there some nefarious intervention to make the fires worse, maybe. I didn't see anything suggesting that other than severe forest fires destroying many homes in the process.
Forest fires where hearths were left standing and steel was left standing sounds like a normal forest fire or house fire at normal burn temperatures. Those are not uncommon.
But we are talking about the fires that didn't burn the forest. That didn't spread randomly. They were pinpointed burns that took out homes and vehicles and left grass, trees, and everything else just feet away standing. This is not possible unless something else was at play.
I hope you can spot the clear difference.
Do an internet image search for this: "what are directed energy weapons?"
And this: https://nypost.com/2015/12/27/air-force-will-test-first-aircraft-mounted-laser-weapon-in-january/
Excerpt: This month, the Force awakens in theaters. Next month, a new force awakens in the New Mexico desert, where the Defense Department is to start testing a weapon worthy of “Star Wars” — a silent, invisible laser that needs just a couple of seconds to burn a hole in targets miles away.
“What it really boils down to is a silent weapon that nobody sees or hears,” said Lt. Gen. Bradley Heithold, commander of Air Force Special Operations Command (AFSOC, pronounced “AFF-sock”).