Also, just because HAARP can broadcast a resonant frequency doesn’t mean that the resonance can cause an earthquake. That’s a step in OP’s logic that’s being overlooked.
I wouldn’t be surprised if the DD can predict earthquakes by a few days or weeks, which would allow them to evacuate their ambassadors. But causing earthquakes is a little too much speculation with too little evidence.
I am super skeptical about an earthquake gun because the amount of energy would be enormous. But the resonance frequency idea is plausible since you can pump that energy in over a long period of time. Let's assume this is possible.
Where would this weapon platform be based? Orbit would be ideal, but geosync could not hit everywhere so you would need several of them to cover the Earth.
How would it get enough energy? Massive solar panels? Maybe.
How would you aim such a weapon? It would be much easier to build and fuel if it were Earth-bound, but then aiming it through the Earth would be tricky and have side effects.
I'm with you on causing an earthquake, but what about triggering an earthquake? And can you trigger it in such a way as to maximize the amount of damage?
(I'm thinking similar to how we trigger avalanches, the power in the avalanche is many orders of magnitude more than what was used to trigger it)
Resonant frequencies are a thing. "Causing" an earthquake would be impossible. The tectonic plates need to have a huge buildup of tension for a 9.0, and resonant frequencies simply cannot set that up no matter how much power.
Releasing that tension could theoretically be possible via resonant frequencies, and given 10 hours of it I wonder how much amplitude would be required? I'm thinking LOTS; we're talking about the earth here.
Phased array antennas can produce a directional signal, known as "beamforming". The principle is they all act together, but out of phase (delayed) so that the "peaks" in the signal from each individual antenna, taking into account the propagation characteristics, are aligned in the desired direction or location. This can cause the signal from each antenna to act synchronously in that spot, but not in other spots, where they are out of phase and average out to noise. As for precisely how this works in the ionosphere, I don't know, but this is a common method in radio.
It is possible, perhaps likely that the effect is not very visible unless the observer is near the target, because most other places the energy is cancelling out. It's possible that the reason it showed up in the Japan data is because the sensor is in Japan.
If you have the ability to direct energy into the earth at a pinpoint location, it's not a stretch that you could trigger an earthquake, by loosening up a sticking point and allowing it to slip. Triggering an earthquake would require far less energy than is released, so the argument that you would notice an earthquake's worth of energy going to the location is not a relevant point. The energy is already there, pent up, waiting for the fault to overcome static friction.
So, I have no idea if that's what happened here, but it's not a priori impossible, unless there's a reason why these principles don't apply in this instance.
If this were the case, you would expect other "nodes" - places where the signal also adds constructively, for example, there might be another point in the direct opposite direction.
HAARP was said to be able to add energy to existing phenomena, such as a hurricane. Never to be able to create one from scratch. Seems to me the level of power required would be lots more for an EQ.
Not only is aiming it an issue but we're talking from 1,000's of miles away; heckuva sniper there.
The thing about haarp is, HOW DO YOU POINT IT TO HIT A TARGET?
I don't think it causes EQs at all.
Possible weather manipulation, but even then, how do you point it?
Mostly likely, it creates a frequency that bounces off the ionosphere and allows the MI to communicate with subs deep in the sea.
Ocaams razor
Also, just because HAARP can broadcast a resonant frequency doesn’t mean that the resonance can cause an earthquake. That’s a step in OP’s logic that’s being overlooked.
I wouldn’t be surprised if the DD can predict earthquakes by a few days or weeks, which would allow them to evacuate their ambassadors. But causing earthquakes is a little too much speculation with too little evidence.
I am super skeptical about an earthquake gun because the amount of energy would be enormous. But the resonance frequency idea is plausible since you can pump that energy in over a long period of time. Let's assume this is possible.
Where would this weapon platform be based? Orbit would be ideal, but geosync could not hit everywhere so you would need several of them to cover the Earth.
How would it get enough energy? Massive solar panels? Maybe.
How would you aim such a weapon? It would be much easier to build and fuel if it were Earth-bound, but then aiming it through the Earth would be tricky and have side effects.
I still think this is unlikely.
I'm with you on causing an earthquake, but what about triggering an earthquake? And can you trigger it in such a way as to maximize the amount of damage?
(I'm thinking similar to how we trigger avalanches, the power in the avalanche is many orders of magnitude more than what was used to trigger it)
Ah, the ol' earthquake gun trick, 99 ;)
Resonant frequencies are a thing. "Causing" an earthquake would be impossible. The tectonic plates need to have a huge buildup of tension for a 9.0, and resonant frequencies simply cannot set that up no matter how much power.
Releasing that tension could theoretically be possible via resonant frequencies, and given 10 hours of it I wonder how much amplitude would be required? I'm thinking LOTS; we're talking about the earth here.
Exactly.
No doubt they have the tech, Tesla reportedly cage up with it over a hundred years ago.
But it's doubtful that is haarp.
Maybe other meetings have haarp like facilities, others are far larger than haarp, China for example.
Must plausible scenario is comms with subs.
Phased array antennas can produce a directional signal, known as "beamforming". The principle is they all act together, but out of phase (delayed) so that the "peaks" in the signal from each individual antenna, taking into account the propagation characteristics, are aligned in the desired direction or location. This can cause the signal from each antenna to act synchronously in that spot, but not in other spots, where they are out of phase and average out to noise. As for precisely how this works in the ionosphere, I don't know, but this is a common method in radio.
It is possible, perhaps likely that the effect is not very visible unless the observer is near the target, because most other places the energy is cancelling out. It's possible that the reason it showed up in the Japan data is because the sensor is in Japan.
If you have the ability to direct energy into the earth at a pinpoint location, it's not a stretch that you could trigger an earthquake, by loosening up a sticking point and allowing it to slip. Triggering an earthquake would require far less energy than is released, so the argument that you would notice an earthquake's worth of energy going to the location is not a relevant point. The energy is already there, pent up, waiting for the fault to overcome static friction.
So, I have no idea if that's what happened here, but it's not a priori impossible, unless there's a reason why these principles don't apply in this instance.
If this were the case, you would expect other "nodes" - places where the signal also adds constructively, for example, there might be another point in the direct opposite direction.
Interesting stuff!
Do phased array antennas typically create antinodes?
HAARP was said to be able to add energy to existing phenomena, such as a hurricane. Never to be able to create one from scratch. Seems to me the level of power required would be lots more for an EQ.
Not only is aiming it an issue but we're talking from 1,000's of miles away; heckuva sniper there.
I just can't imagine concentration of energy longer that that wouldn't just go straight through the atmosphere to space. No logical sense to me.
Low frequency bands I could see bouncing off the ionosphere and umbrellaing outward to cover 50% of the earth or close to it, for comms.