Also, just because HAARP can broadcast a resonant frequency doesn’t mean that the resonance can cause an earthquake. That’s a step in OP’s logic that’s being overlooked.
I wouldn’t be surprised if the DD can predict earthquakes by a few days or weeks, which would allow them to evacuate their ambassadors. But causing earthquakes is a little too much speculation with too little evidence.
I am super skeptical about an earthquake gun because the amount of energy would be enormous. But the resonance frequency idea is plausible since you can pump that energy in over a long period of time. Let's assume this is possible.
Where would this weapon platform be based? Orbit would be ideal, but geosync could not hit everywhere so you would need several of them to cover the Earth.
How would it get enough energy? Massive solar panels? Maybe.
How would you aim such a weapon? It would be much easier to build and fuel if it were Earth-bound, but then aiming it through the Earth would be tricky and have side effects.
I'm with you on causing an earthquake, but what about triggering an earthquake? And can you trigger it in such a way as to maximize the amount of damage?
(I'm thinking similar to how we trigger avalanches, the power in the avalanche is many orders of magnitude more than what was used to trigger it)
Resonant frequencies are a thing. "Causing" an earthquake would be impossible. The tectonic plates need to have a huge buildup of tension for a 9.0, and resonant frequencies simply cannot set that up no matter how much power.
Releasing that tension could theoretically be possible via resonant frequencies, and given 10 hours of it I wonder how much amplitude would be required? I'm thinking LOTS; we're talking about the earth here.
Also, just because HAARP can broadcast a resonant frequency doesn’t mean that the resonance can cause an earthquake. That’s a step in OP’s logic that’s being overlooked.
I wouldn’t be surprised if the DD can predict earthquakes by a few days or weeks, which would allow them to evacuate their ambassadors. But causing earthquakes is a little too much speculation with too little evidence.
I am super skeptical about an earthquake gun because the amount of energy would be enormous. But the resonance frequency idea is plausible since you can pump that energy in over a long period of time. Let's assume this is possible.
Where would this weapon platform be based? Orbit would be ideal, but geosync could not hit everywhere so you would need several of them to cover the Earth.
How would it get enough energy? Massive solar panels? Maybe.
How would you aim such a weapon? It would be much easier to build and fuel if it were Earth-bound, but then aiming it through the Earth would be tricky and have side effects.
I still think this is unlikely.
I'm with you on causing an earthquake, but what about triggering an earthquake? And can you trigger it in such a way as to maximize the amount of damage?
(I'm thinking similar to how we trigger avalanches, the power in the avalanche is many orders of magnitude more than what was used to trigger it)
Ah, the ol' earthquake gun trick, 99 ;)
Resonant frequencies are a thing. "Causing" an earthquake would be impossible. The tectonic plates need to have a huge buildup of tension for a 9.0, and resonant frequencies simply cannot set that up no matter how much power.
Releasing that tension could theoretically be possible via resonant frequencies, and given 10 hours of it I wonder how much amplitude would be required? I'm thinking LOTS; we're talking about the earth here.
Exactly.
No doubt they have the tech, Tesla reportedly cage up with it over a hundred years ago.
But it's doubtful that is haarp.
Maybe other meetings have haarp like facilities, others are far larger than haarp, China for example.
Must plausible scenario is comms with subs.