I've always questioned this crap while in college years ago. Asked a classmate in a debate; "who's vetting the so called peers that review this shit? How do we know this publication is impartial?" Dude couldn't even compute or understand the question. FF to 2020 thru 2023 and that question presented ain't so stupid anymore.
and that question presented ain't so stupid anymore.
It's never a stupid question, no matter the time, year, decade, or millennia. Questioning what ANY Government says (including every subsidiary agency), does, or wants people to do is a DUTY and RIGHT to every Citizen that could be affected.
Keep asking good questions like this, as it shows Wisdom enough to do so.
If a “scientific study” took two years and cost several million dollars, how is that supposed to be “independently validated” by a group of volunteer peers? They would need another two years and an additional several million dollars to recreate the entire first study. And it would go right back to the bias of the corporation or organization paying for it. “Peer-review” doesn’t make any sense as a concept just looking at it on paper. You don’t even need any specific expertise to see through that.
I've always questioned this crap while in college years ago. Asked a classmate in a debate; "who's vetting the so called peers that review this shit? How do we know this publication is impartial?" Dude couldn't even compute or understand the question. FF to 2020 thru 2023 and that question presented ain't so stupid anymore.
It's never a stupid question, no matter the time, year, decade, or millennia. Questioning what ANY Government says (including every subsidiary agency), does, or wants people to do is a DUTY and RIGHT to every Citizen that could be affected.
Keep asking good questions like this, as it shows Wisdom enough to do so.
I hope your comment becomes the most up voted, because it's the most important question.
If a “scientific study” took two years and cost several million dollars, how is that supposed to be “independently validated” by a group of volunteer peers? They would need another two years and an additional several million dollars to recreate the entire first study. And it would go right back to the bias of the corporation or organization paying for it. “Peer-review” doesn’t make any sense as a concept just looking at it on paper. You don’t even need any specific expertise to see through that.