Yes, true, but the real mindblowing thing about Antarctica is that it was never supposed to be populated. It would show very advanced civilisations which must have been before the last ice age at least. That's currently not in the program.
I wonder if that's why they want to restrict carbon emissions,so badly. They desperately don't want the ice to melt, and for us to figure out who we really are.
Ha. I never thought of this but it makes perfect sense. Except for the fact that CO2 barely has any effect on temperature so I'm not sure what the angle is there.
CO2 is plant food. Highly increasing CO2 emissions would reverse desertification, among other things. Trees would get bigger, etc. It would eventually make the planet warm enough for all (or most) of the *permanent ice, to melt (seasons are still a thing). Water levels wouldn't rise, that's pseudoscience. But a lot would become exposed.
*edit: akshually, if anything: water levels would drop, because water expands when frozen.
It's a pretty neat thought! We know now that there are areas of Siberia that were once fertile enough to host herds of woolly mammoths, etc. It's exciting to think that, at some prior age, Antarctica could have been the same way
I also think it's great that there's a possibility of learning new things about the planet and Humanity, at this point in time. We think we know all there is to know but then we get a surprise and the opportunity to learn more.
If you haven’t already read about it, read up a bit on the island of Flores and Homo Floresiensis. The official story is that they’re long gone. The old timey locals say they were getting beaten up by Homo sapiens until a couple hundred years ago, disappeared into the jungle for safety, and are most likely still there.
Yes, true, but the real mindblowing thing about Antarctica is that it was never supposed to be populated. It would show very advanced civilisations which must have been before the last ice age at least. That's currently not in the program.
I wonder if that's why they want to restrict carbon emissions,so badly. They desperately don't want the ice to melt, and for us to figure out who we really are.
Ha. I never thought of this but it makes perfect sense. Except for the fact that CO2 barely has any effect on temperature so I'm not sure what the angle is there.
CO2 is plant food. Highly increasing CO2 emissions would reverse desertification, among other things. Trees would get bigger, etc. It would eventually make the planet warm enough for all (or most) of the *permanent ice, to melt (seasons are still a thing). Water levels wouldn't rise, that's pseudoscience. But a lot would become exposed.
*edit: akshually, if anything: water levels would drop, because water expands when frozen.
Which is why they don’t allow people there. We aren’t supposed to know about the Nephelim who will pose as aliens.
Except that you can go on a tour to be there. No problem not knowing about something that didn't exist. https://travel.quarkexpeditions.com
Ah yes, a guided tour so you only see what they want... very convincing...
It's a pretty neat thought! We know now that there are areas of Siberia that were once fertile enough to host herds of woolly mammoths, etc. It's exciting to think that, at some prior age, Antarctica could have been the same way
I also think it's great that there's a possibility of learning new things about the planet and Humanity, at this point in time. We think we know all there is to know but then we get a surprise and the opportunity to learn more.
If you haven’t already read about it, read up a bit on the island of Flores and Homo Floresiensis. The official story is that they’re long gone. The old timey locals say they were getting beaten up by Homo sapiens until a couple hundred years ago, disappeared into the jungle for safety, and are most likely still there.
At some point in the past Antarctica was at the equator. Magnetic Pole shifts can seriously rearrange things