Anon is not wrong. Additionally, it's not the jannies fault persay either. They can't help that one or two of them keep falling for the same old cheese in the same old mousetrap...
Your link just shows people being hopeful about it. Almost nobody would have bet even money that SCOTUS was about to save the world and remove hundreds of people from congress, etc.
But there's nothing wrong with hoping. Nothing wrong with posting updates about the case. Nothing wrong with discussing the case. For some reason any talking about this case is shamed.
That link is the aggregated search for "Brunson" across the win-verse.
It's figuratively an archived timeline, which paints a very different picture than how you simplify and lump together very different anon opinions and positions.
To your second point, yep agreed, nothing wrong with hoping. But something is very wrong with deriving hope from known disinformation paytriot streams.
How many times does Ward, Nino, Herms, Savin, Parkes, Santa, et al need to rope you folks along (cashing in the whole ride to boot) before you realize the elephant in the room: if these faggots are promoting or prophecizing anything, then it's a load of hot garbage
It's a little surprising, there were endless stickies about how this was going to be the real deal.
No there weren't. Every post I've seen on it presupposes that it's a longshot.
Oh, but there was.
Anon is not wrong. Additionally, it's not the jannies fault persay either. They can't help that one or two of them keep falling for the same old cheese in the same old mousetrap...
Your link just shows people being hopeful about it. Almost nobody would have bet even money that SCOTUS was about to save the world and remove hundreds of people from congress, etc.
But there's nothing wrong with hoping. Nothing wrong with posting updates about the case. Nothing wrong with discussing the case. For some reason any talking about this case is shamed.
No.
That link is the aggregated search for "Brunson" across the win-verse.
It's figuratively an archived timeline, which paints a very different picture than how you simplify and lump together very different anon opinions and positions.
To your second point, yep agreed, nothing wrong with hoping. But something is very wrong with deriving hope from known disinformation paytriot streams.
How many times does Ward, Nino, Herms, Savin, Parkes, Santa, et al need to rope you folks along (cashing in the whole ride to boot) before you realize the elephant in the room: if these faggots are promoting or prophecizing anything, then it's a load of hot garbage
I feel like we've been looking at two different boards entirely.