Once it's filed the [supreme] court has full power, under rule 11, to judge and execute the whole complaint, even if they deny hearing, they can behind closed doors, execute this at any time they want...
They can go back as long as they're still justices, they can go back and pull this off the shelf and execute it, even without a hearing, even without a public date docketed...
Once it's filed the [supreme] court has full power, under rule 11, to judge and execute the whole complaint, even if they deny hearing, they can behind closed doors, execute this at any time they want...
They can go back as long as they're still justices, they can go back and pull this off the shelf and execute it, even without a hearing, even without a public date docketed...
Hillary Clinton is more likely to be arrested tomorrow at 8:30 am than this happening though
Just sayin - courts and entire govt are irrevocably, irredeemably corrupt
We are living on borrowed time, friends
Hope it's going to be Biblical because we could really use that
Sorry to bother you Madrashro, but I'd like to clarify that the words in my comment were copied verbatim from what Loy Brunson actually said himself (in the linked video). If you have a few spare minutes later today, maybe you could get in contact with Loy Brunson, and advise of him where he is going wrong. His twitter handle is: @BrunsonSCOTUS I fully understand if the hourly rate you normally bill for your services precludes you from offering free advice. Thanks for any help you can give.
I understand the excitement over the Brunson case, but I’m of the mind (shared by others here) that the Brunsons are acting in bad faith to solicit donations, so I doubt correcting him on Twitter (which I don’t use) would move the needle.
Loy Brunson:(Watch video from 2:30 onwards)
Once it's filed the [supreme] court has full power, under rule 11, to judge and execute the whole complaint, even if they deny hearing, they can behind closed doors, execute this at any time they want...
They can go back as long as they're still justices, they can go back and pull this off the shelf and execute it, even without a hearing, even without a public date docketed...
Hillary Clinton is more likely to be arrested tomorrow at 8:30 am than this happening though
Just sayin - courts and entire govt are irrevocably, irredeemably corrupt
We are living on borrowed time, friends
Hope it's going to be Biblical because we could really use that
None of that is true. That’s not the way the rules of appellate procedure work.
Sorry to bother you Madrashro, but I'd like to clarify that the words in my comment were copied verbatim from what Loy Brunson actually said himself (in the linked video). If you have a few spare minutes later today, maybe you could get in contact with Loy Brunson, and advise of him where he is going wrong. His twitter handle is: @BrunsonSCOTUS I fully understand if the hourly rate you normally bill for your services precludes you from offering free advice. Thanks for any help you can give.
I understand the excitement over the Brunson case, but I’m of the mind (shared by others here) that the Brunsons are acting in bad faith to solicit donations, so I doubt correcting him on Twitter (which I don’t use) would move the needle.
And they can also show up in rainbow-colored robes "at any time they want." So, which is the more likely?