Elon is trolling the Free Masons... 😜
(media.greatawakening.win)
You're viewing a single comment thread. View all comments, or full comment thread.
Comments (33)
sorted by:
Freemasonry hid Tartarian buildings/history, laying the foundation of lies of which our society is built on.
Looks that way to me. All those amazingly beautiful buildings (made of stone for the most part), destroyed for no reason that makes sense.
The Tartarians are just the Scythians. We call them the "Mongolians," and we think that they ruled for a short amount of time, then fell apart. THAT is the lie.
The Scythians ruled between 20-30% of the world (most of Asia and a great deal of Europe) for somewhere between 2500 to 5000 years (or more). The Scythian Empire was multicultural, and started from at least 800BC, though much more likely around 3300BC (Yamnaya/Corded Ware cultures were either precursors, or were just the same culture and system of government). Tartaria's final decline began with the Moscovy revolt (formerly a Principality of Scythia/Tartaria) in the 16th century, though it took quite a long time to die. It officially ended in the beginning of the 20th Century when the USSR finally squashed it and, with the aid of the rest of the worlds "experts" (the Ministry of Truth created by Rockefeller/Rothschild et al) purposefully hid their existence.
The Scythian Empire is hidden from "truthers" by mashing in evidence of giants and architecture that is irrelevant (not false, just not relevant), In many cases that evidence is falsely applied (has nothing to do with the Tartarian Empire). In other words, there is evidence of giants that is hidden, and there is evidence of architecture that is hidden, but neither of those things is directly related to the removal of the Scythians/Tartarians from history.
Forcing the evidence of giants and architecture into the Scythian history is a form of Controlled Opposition. By making Tartarian history "out there" (fringe), it hides their real history, which is that there was an Empire, called the Scythians, that FAR outshone the Roman Empire, even subjugating it at some points (the Romans paid tribute to the Scythians at some points in their history).
In other words, the evidence suggests that the Tartarian "giants/free energy architecture" myth is a lie to cover a much bigger lie from those who would investigate it.
never heard of the Scythians before/thanks. And do you know anything about giants in America? some tribes have stories of cannibal giants, and another race of little 'deveals' as Lewis and Clark called them.
crazy to realize HOW much TPTB have hidden from us.
I probably should have included some links in the above post.
Here is evidence that the Tartarians are just the Scythians given a new name:
Petes, 1722 (page 15)
Thomas Lanquet, 1549 (page 558, year 1395)
Denis Petau, 1659 (page 720)
Sir Walter Raleigh, 1560 (page 758)
There are many others. In fact, in order to believe that the Tartarians were not the Scythians, you must ignore every single historian prior to the 20th century.
"Official" history says the Scythians were wiped out in 200AD (without any meaningful event that could have done so), and then official history calls Attila the Hun a Scythian 300 years later. It's quite the pickle. As far as I can tell, the name "Tartarians" came about with Ghengis Khan ~1160AD, but who gave them that name I am not sure. Every single shred of evidence suggests that they were just the Scythians, and that the Scythians never went away at any point in between, on the contrary, there are numerous other historical events and leaders that mark them clearly.
Here is evidence that the USSR purposefully hid the existence of the Tartarians/Scythians:
https://www.cia.gov/readingroom/docs/CIA-RDP78-02771R000200090002-6.pdf (page 10). (Note: you may have to copy/paste the pdf name into the search bar on that page, as direct links don't always work.)
Here is the reference that paper above uses, written by historian and Soviet expert Walter Kolartz (starts on page 31, relevant section on page 39). It shows that the Tartarian language was intentionally removed from existence through the First and Second Alphabet Revolution conducted by the USSR to purposefully separate the past and the present from those Tartarians that remained, wiping out their history from themselves.
As for Giants, I've seen many things, but I haven't written up anything on them formally, so my evidence is not as well compiled. It also really depends on what you mean by "giants." There is quite a bit of evidence of "Indians" (Catalina, Patagonia, etc.) that were in the 7-8 foot range, but are those really "giants?" We have otherwise perfectly normal and healthy people that are in that range today, if not an entire "race" of such. How tall does a group of people need to be to be called "giant" and not just "really tall?"
There is evidence for taller, in the 9 to 10 foot range. Those might be legitimately "giants," but to a 7-8 foot tall person, they are merely "really tall." I've seen evidence of 12, 16, 20 feet tall, but how good is that evidence? It gets a lot worse the taller you go. But evidence that "isn't that good" doesn't mean bad evidence. I really need to dig in deeper into those pieces of evidence, and that is something I just haven't had the time for.
There is substantial evidence that "really tall people" and "advanced people" has been hidden though, so who knows what the truth is.
Enjoy your offerings, Slyver, as always.
Not to derail, but wonder if "Tartarian" has any connection with Game of Thrones elites "Targaryen," kings so powerful they had dragons (Asian history connection).
Just a thought...
Scythians perhaps settled in Scotland. Also a lot of information that the welsh settled in North America (and a lot of misinformation too surrounding this).
https://www.historyisnowmagazine.com/blog/2019/3/3/the-origins-of-scotland-and-where-its-people-came-from#.Y_fSIy0RqLc=