My wife declined the Hepatitis B vaccine for my newborn. We argued about it. I’m scared to death of making the wrong decision. I’m asking for help, what do you guys think is appropriate for newborn vaccines? The nurse came to our house and told us if we didn’t get the vaccines they wouldn’t work with us anymore. I brought up autism and she said that the person who came out with that lost their medical license and there are ZERO negative side effects for the Hep B vax. Exact words.
It was a long and hard pregnancy. My wife has had trauma in her past and refused any meds (which I was conflicted about because it was a nightmare to live through) and now she may be suffering from post-partem depression. She is way more anti-vax than I am, hates hospitals and doctors after what has happened, and I can’t blame her. Any thoughts or advice would be very much appreciated.
Yes, refuse ALL vaccines.
There are NO vaccines that have EVER proven SAFE or EFFECTIVE.
NONE.
ZERO.
NADA.
ZILCH.
NEVER.
Vaccines are ALL a scam that is used to scare people into taking something that will protect them from something that the drug cannot protect them from.
It is all a misunderstanding of what is seen in electronmicroscopes when people THINK they are looking at a "virus."
https://rumble.com/v29v6ta-thinking-lesson-dr-tom-cowan-demystifies-peter-mccoulloughs-nonsense.html
Tell the nurse that you want to do the right thing, and ask for the specific research that she is relying on to claim that there are ZERO negative side effects for the Hep B vax. And while she is at it, please provide the documented studies showing that they are effective (as well as safe).
This will be impossible to do, since no such studies have EVER been done. She is likely to obfuscate and distract from your questions, but insist that you want to see these studies that she relies on -- so YOU CAN MAKE THE RIGHT DECISION.
If she somehow comes up with something, share it with us and we can review. We would like to see if such studies exist, and we would also like to review to identify how and why the studies are fraudulent, as they are most likely to be (if she produces anything at all).
My guess is either you get nothing but gibberish and no documentation to back it up, or you get some literature from either Big Pharma or her hospital/clinic that is marketing material and NOT any actual studies.
But if I am wrong, let's take a look at the studies and see if they are valid or not.
Editors from the "most prestigious" scientific medical journals (Lancet and New England Journal of Medicine) have stated on the record that MOST published studies in these journals are FALSE and are NOT scientific (they are for profit and politics).
Understand that vaccines CANNOT ever work, because what they claim they are doing they are not actually doing.
They can ONLY cause harm.
But let's see if the nurse can prove me wrong.
That nurse is a straight up liar. I quickly found the insert with the info they like to not distribute. https://www.fda.gov/files/vaccines%2C%20blood%20%26%20biologics/published/package-insert-recombivax-hb.pdf There is a page long list of adverse side effects.
The missing word in the study of Virology is Theory. The Viral Theory is widely accepted, but still unproven. Why is the Theory of Viruses still unproven? The common blindly accepted answer is that they are too small to see. Seriously? We can see inside of an atom, but we cannot see inside of a Virus, let alone even detect a virus? They told us that we cannot see viruses because they are between 50-150 microns in size, however they could see the spike proteins sticking out of their surface? WTF? IBM created a 2 micron transistor, but we cannot see a 50 micron virus. To top it all off, virtually all viruses have been treated with various anti-parasitics, that is awfully strange. Perhaps we should take a closer look at these "viruses".
Yes, it's necessary for you to see the evidence in order to give your "informed consent".
We have reached a point in history where so-called "experts" are nothing but parrots, repeating back to others what they have been told, and having done none of their own research.
This is true in medicine, science in general, virology in particular, history, economics, and a myriad of real life issues we deal with.
We can't get informed consent because the people who are supposed to supply it have no clue themselves -- and they think they are knowledgeable for no reason other than some "expert higher than them" told them, even though that person also has no clue.
This!
Your body produces an immune response when infected with a virus which protects you during future exposure. Some oral polio vaccines use a weakened live virus, therefore I cannot understand why you would think that wouldn't produce a similar immune response as exposure to the un-weakened virus.
How safe it actually is is up for debate I suppose, but I'm not sure how one could believe in the body's immune system and not believe expose to a weakened live virus in a vaccine wouldn't work in a similar way as exposure to the full strength virus.