Just to be clear, before I begin, let the record show that you're here on GA to help us by shilling the establishment medical narrative that is REPLETE with DELIBERATE FLAWS & ASSUMPTIONS, not honest errors and mistakes, that are designed to disempower humanity and keep us operating in a state of FEAR. None of which you yet REALIZE as demonstrated by your continuing attempts to uphold the establishment lamestream narrative.
I find this remarkable actually. You must be EXTREMELY NEW to GA/Q/Conspiracy Reality. Apparently I'm going to be forced to treat you like somebody from the "Democracy Now" forum or Facebook - a normie - a died-in-the-wool academic. This requires an entirely different approach. After many years of interacting with this class of consciousness, I have a near complete understanding of to proceed as such. An entirely different approach than how I interact with the general GA population.
Have you ever heard the quote: "It's easier to fool somebody than to convince them they've been fooled"? It's a highly accurate statement. Do you know who said it? Mark Twain you say? So the 99% believe. Guess what? Even with this quote, as accurate as it is, it's doubly powerful as it proves the very point it's making. Because were you to dig a little deeper you'd learn that there's no evidence that Twain ever said this. As it turns out, there are dozens upon dozens of witty, intelligent and satirical quotes attributed to Twain that simply can't be verified as being said by Twain. In short, Twain is the "witty/intelligent quote go-to-guy", having uttered so many in his career. And had you taken the time to look a little further into the matter, you'd find out that Twain has, on at least two different occasions, made statements echoing the sentiment of the quote essentially using different words.
I share all this as it makes four invaluable points that must be understood if you wish to extricate yourself from the establishment quagmire. The first is, you, me and everybody else have been FOOLED millions of times over. Second, you must also realize that nobody wants to admit they've been fooled. It's human nature. And this is why it's so much harder to convince you that you've been fooled. You demonstrate this over and over again with nearly every point you think you're making about what I've said. Ringing loudly within all your efforts to tell me I'm wrong and discredit me is the sentiment "there's no way I've been fooled because look at all the (Pseudo)-evidence I can find with a rapid-fire Google search that supports my beliefs." And thirdly, you make the cardinal sin throughout your efforts, BLINDLY BELIEVING IN AUTHORITY without making a single effort to investigate any deeper. And fourth, you make no effort to do any critical thinking before making your points. You accept what you're being told at face value.
This is the "Authority Syndrome" brainwashing that all our leftist, normie, NPC friends are fully mesmerized by. And extricating them from it has thus far been near-impossible to achieve.
Another thing I find quite fascinating is trying to understand what you think I'm doing here. It appears you are under the impression that I "made everything up" on my own as you continue to refer to "my theory". You also clearly think I'm a lunatic of sorts, sharing highly damaging and detrimental health and well-being information in order to cause harm and injury to my fellow humanity. Thus, in your mind, you've branded me an actual THREAT to your very well-being and safety. This you've made quite clear.
I find your position astonishingly naive and completely backwards as it's made abundantly clear on a daily basis here on GA that in reality, in truth and in all fact, it is the ESTABLISHMENT MEDICAL COMMUNITY that has proven to be the greatest threat to humanity's health and well-being. There's zero chance you're not aware of this frequenting this board.
This is inexcusable ignorance on your part which makes me question your intentions all the more. Now I do understand, many people here think it's just the recent Covid narrative and poisonous jabs when the establishment lost its way, not yet aware of how long the lies and deceptions have been going on. But this group of people approach what I say with curiosity and questions, not deliberate attempts to cast me as a fool, and worse, accuse me of spreading information that is detrimental to their health.
You're the first of this kind I have encountered. And make no mistake, you've cast me in this light of being "the real bad guy out to harm people" with everything you've said thus far. Let's not kid ourselves.
So pointing out flaws in your theory and offering counter evidence is a rant?
Let's use clear language as we proceed. Would you agree that you BELIEVE you pointed out some flaws in "My theory"? The only person thus far crediting you with pointing out any flaws is you. Right?
So I'm going to give you the opportunity to pick the most definitive "flaw" you BELIEVE you've pointed out and we'll dissect it from beginning to end. We simply don't have time to handle each one right now due to your present state of authority-mesmerization-syndrome. Hopefully, having walked you through your favorite one, you can then do your own due diligence and unwind the other points you think you've made.
So pick your favorite "flaw" and we'll do a deep dive together. That is, if you're ready to learn how you've been fooled.
I'm saying that viral and bacterial pathology does a better job of articulating its ideas, making accurate predictions, and providing evidence than you have.
Then you're deeply lost in the establishment, academic deception. This is the FUNDAMENTAL problem you have - blind belief in authority. As the ENTIRETY of viral and bacterial pathology is a LIE. Not some of it. Not a few parts of it. The whole she-bang, from beginning to end. The very fact that Koch's Postulates have never been satisfied should be all I need to say to prove my point. But unfortunately, due to your BELIEFS, it could take us quite some time to show you how you, and all the virologists and bacteriologists out there have been quite easily FOOLED, and why it's so hard to now convince them of such.
Is this your favorite "flaw" you wish to do a deep-dive on?
It's not a matter of trust, it's a matter of who has better arguments and evidence.
So you're now on record stating the establishment medical academics have Better arguments and evidence. Perhaps you'd prefer we dissect this irrational belief system flaw of yours? I can assure you, the exact opposite is the truth. Myself and thousands of others earnestly looked for these "better arguments and evidence" for well over a year. We couldn't find a shred of it. Not even a single point we could give them credit for. All we found were lies, deceptions and brainwashees blindly believing authorities.
Your model doesn't even accurately model the spread of communicable diseases because it denies that people catch bacteria from others and denies the viruses exist entirely.
Your thinking is backwards and this is perhaps the biggest hurdle we have to overcome. Do you believe Unicorns exist? If not, then you "deny they exist" which implies you're at fault, you're the "bad guy", you're the "denier". You cast aspersions in the wrong direction with this line of reasoning.
Further, your sentence IMPLICITLY ASSERTS the existence of such a thing known as a "Communicable Dis-ease". To assert that which has yet to be scientifically proven is what you've done in several of your points thus far. You've got the cart ahead of the horse. You're miles downstream from the lies and deceptions.
We know Covid is an engineered bioweapon because there's evidence.
And yet again, asserting what is unproven. You're a blind believer in the authoritative narrative. The only "We" in your sentence are the blind believers. Considering this is a dialogue between two people, this is a remarkably IGNORANT and ARROGANT statement to make as the only "we" in this context is you and I. And I can assure you, I have not seen a shred of scientific evidence demonstrating there is such a THING as "Covid (SARS-CoV2)". But you go one step further downstream in your false claim. Not only do you assert there is such a "thing", but you go one step further and also falsely claim this "thing" is a "bioweapon". All without a shred of actual proof.
Do you see how you're failing to make your points on all counts? Is this the "flaw in my theory" you wish to do a deep dive on? You've got to pick only one as it's obviously going to take a great deal of time and effort to deconstruct the myriad of FALSE BELIEFS you hold in your mind as "truths".
If you switch to the topic of viruses and bacteria not existing or not being pathogenic at all, that is a different set of claims, and it's your job to justify your own claims.
Damn straight it is. But you aren't interested in understanding this. Because you assert again and again and again that I can't possibly achieve this. Your mind is closed. You've clearly demonstrated this with every statement you make. After all "we know Covid is an engineered bioweapon", right?
Amidst the myriad of logical fallacies you are trying to wield against me, this is yet another; the "reverse proof of claim logical fallacy". There's a maxim of law that states: "He who makes the claim bears the burden of proof". And in all we're discussing, the CLAIMANT is undeniably our trillion-dollar medical establishment cabal. So is this the "flaw" you wish to investigate? That you believe the establishment can support their claim that viruses exist or bacteria are pathogenic?
The establishment isn't wrong just because they're the establishment. If you're going to assert that anyone is wrong on any given subject, it's your responsibility to explain why and provide evidence.
LOL. You've got everything backwards yet again. The problem we're going to have here is that you don't realize that what you have accepted as "evidence" of your BELIEFS is anything but. It's going to be a long unwind to demonstrate because it's clear you aren't yet ready to accept the possibility that you've been *FOOLED yet. This you make clear again and again.
Simply screaming that they're the establishment isn't an argument, it's an inversion of the appeal to authority fallacy.
You'd think after all we've been through the past 3 years, you'd be open to what I say and doing some investigation of your own. But nope, you're actually trapped in this space where they only pulled off the great Covid lie recently. That it took them over a hundred years to pull off this lie you are entirely unwilling to accept as a possibility. In your mind, it's simply IMPOSSIBLE that this is the case. This is what you think -> "there's no way they could have been lying to us all this time about "muh germs". This is your resounding stance. IMPOSSIBLE. You overtly admit to this again and again. There's just no way you could have been fooled, is there?
Being anti-establishment for the sake of being anti-establishment isn't helpful. Such an attitude, when not based on evidence and rational arguments, is purely emotional thinking.
Who said it was? It is you that builds the strawman arguments. You're projecting all the time as well. By your name-calling and implications about what I've shared and my intentions, it is you that has injected "emotional thinking" into this discourse.
Not once did you say - "well, what you say is certainly interesting, what led you to these conclusions"? Not even once. All you've done this far is attack, attack and attack what I've said from a deeply EMOTIONAL state of FEAR.
let the record show that you're here on GA to help us by shilling the establishment medical narrative that is REPLETE with DELIBERATE FLAWS & ASSUMPTIONS,
Yet you have failed to show one instance where germ theory or viral pathology are incorrect, and your own theory has zero predictive power.
I find this remarkable actually. You must be EXTREMELY NEW to GA/Q/Conspiracy Reality.
Ah, the old argument of "my opponent disagrees with me, therefore they're an idiot". Nice ad hominem. I've been in the Q space for at least 2 years now. So what? Seniority does not magically bestow legitimacy.
This is the FUNDAMENTAL problem you have - blind belief in authority.
Asking for evidence and logic equals blind belief in authority.... right. Whatever you say.
[on whether Covid is a bioweapon] And yet again, asserting what is unproven. You're a blind believer in the authoritative narrative.
But the idea that Covid is a bioweapon runs counter to the dominant medical establishment. So then I am not blindly believing authority, if I was I wouldn't be on GAW in the first place.
Because you assert again and again and again that I can't possibly achieve this. [prove that bacteria/viruses aren't the cause of disease]
I never said you couldn't, I said you haven't. Not once have explained how emotional states or phobias trigger illnesses, you just assert that this is the case and expect me to believe you because you're anti establishment, which ironically is itself a call to blind belief in authority.
"He who makes the claim bears the burden of proof". And in all we're discussing, the CLAIMANT is undeniably our trillion-dollar medical establishment cabal. So is this the "flaw" you wish to investigate?
Being a multi-trillion dollar industry is neither a crime nor a flaw. If so, then the scam artists who push flat earth, NESARA, and germ theory are guilty of the exact same thing on a smaller scale.
The problem we're going to have here is that you don't realize that what you have accepted as "evidence" of your BELIEFS is anything but.
You are pushing the claim that the evidence for germ theory is bunk. That's YOUR claim, which means YOU have to defend it.
You'd think after all we've been through the past 3 years, you'd be open to what I say and doing some investigation of your own.
I am open to those who make reasonable arguments and put forward evidence, you have done neither. I'm still waiting for which strain of Hepatitis excessive anger causes, and how the heck an emotional state causes an blood-borne pathogen/STD.
Not once did you say - "well, what you say is certainly interesting, what led you to these conclusions"? Not even once. All you've done this far is attack, attack and attack what I've said from a deeply EMOTIONAL state of FEAR.
Pointing out potential problems and lack of evidence is a golden opportunity for you to explain how you arrived at your conclusions. Yet you have failed to do so; you have only doubled down on your assertions with no explanation and failed to address the contradictory evidence that I provided. Putting your theory under scrutiny is not an attack, it is how ideas are forged and refined. All theories should be subject to scrutiny, and if you view that as an attack, all it shows is that you are the one who is afraid of criticism.
Just to be clear, before I begin, let the record show that you're here on GA to help us by shilling the establishment medical narrative that is REPLETE with DELIBERATE FLAWS & ASSUMPTIONS, not honest errors and mistakes, that are designed to disempower humanity and keep us operating in a state of FEAR. None of which you yet REALIZE as demonstrated by your continuing attempts to uphold the establishment lamestream narrative.
I find this remarkable actually. You must be EXTREMELY NEW to GA/Q/Conspiracy Reality. Apparently I'm going to be forced to treat you like somebody from the "Democracy Now" forum or Facebook - a normie - a died-in-the-wool academic. This requires an entirely different approach. After many years of interacting with this class of consciousness, I have a near complete understanding of to proceed as such. An entirely different approach than how I interact with the general GA population.
Have you ever heard the quote: "It's easier to fool somebody than to convince them they've been fooled"? It's a highly accurate statement. Do you know who said it? Mark Twain you say? So the 99% believe. Guess what? Even with this quote, as accurate as it is, it's doubly powerful as it proves the very point it's making. Because were you to dig a little deeper you'd learn that there's no evidence that Twain ever said this. As it turns out, there are dozens upon dozens of witty, intelligent and satirical quotes attributed to Twain that simply can't be verified as being said by Twain. In short, Twain is the "witty/intelligent quote go-to-guy", having uttered so many in his career. And had you taken the time to look a little further into the matter, you'd find out that Twain has, on at least two different occasions, made statements echoing the sentiment of the quote essentially using different words.
I share all this as it makes four invaluable points that must be understood if you wish to extricate yourself from the establishment quagmire. The first is, you, me and everybody else have been FOOLED millions of times over. Second, you must also realize that nobody wants to admit they've been fooled. It's human nature. And this is why it's so much harder to convince you that you've been fooled. You demonstrate this over and over again with nearly every point you think you're making about what I've said. Ringing loudly within all your efforts to tell me I'm wrong and discredit me is the sentiment "there's no way I've been fooled because look at all the (Pseudo)-evidence I can find with a rapid-fire Google search that supports my beliefs." And thirdly, you make the cardinal sin throughout your efforts, BLINDLY BELIEVING IN AUTHORITY without making a single effort to investigate any deeper. And fourth, you make no effort to do any critical thinking before making your points. You accept what you're being told at face value.
This is the "Authority Syndrome" brainwashing that all our leftist, normie, NPC friends are fully mesmerized by. And extricating them from it has thus far been near-impossible to achieve.
Another thing I find quite fascinating is trying to understand what you think I'm doing here. It appears you are under the impression that I "made everything up" on my own as you continue to refer to "my theory". You also clearly think I'm a lunatic of sorts, sharing highly damaging and detrimental health and well-being information in order to cause harm and injury to my fellow humanity. Thus, in your mind, you've branded me an actual THREAT to your very well-being and safety. This you've made quite clear.
I find your position astonishingly naive and completely backwards as it's made abundantly clear on a daily basis here on GA that in reality, in truth and in all fact, it is the ESTABLISHMENT MEDICAL COMMUNITY that has proven to be the greatest threat to humanity's health and well-being. There's zero chance you're not aware of this frequenting this board.
This is inexcusable ignorance on your part which makes me question your intentions all the more. Now I do understand, many people here think it's just the recent Covid narrative and poisonous jabs when the establishment lost its way, not yet aware of how long the lies and deceptions have been going on. But this group of people approach what I say with curiosity and questions, not deliberate attempts to cast me as a fool, and worse, accuse me of spreading information that is detrimental to their health.
You're the first of this kind I have encountered. And make no mistake, you've cast me in this light of being "the real bad guy out to harm people" with everything you've said thus far. Let's not kid ourselves.
Let's use clear language as we proceed. Would you agree that you BELIEVE you pointed out some flaws in "My theory"? The only person thus far crediting you with pointing out any flaws is you. Right?
So I'm going to give you the opportunity to pick the most definitive "flaw" you BELIEVE you've pointed out and we'll dissect it from beginning to end. We simply don't have time to handle each one right now due to your present state of authority-mesmerization-syndrome. Hopefully, having walked you through your favorite one, you can then do your own due diligence and unwind the other points you think you've made.
So pick your favorite "flaw" and we'll do a deep dive together. That is, if you're ready to learn how you've been fooled.
Then you're deeply lost in the establishment, academic deception. This is the FUNDAMENTAL problem you have - blind belief in authority. As the ENTIRETY of viral and bacterial pathology is a LIE. Not some of it. Not a few parts of it. The whole she-bang, from beginning to end. The very fact that Koch's Postulates have never been satisfied should be all I need to say to prove my point. But unfortunately, due to your BELIEFS, it could take us quite some time to show you how you, and all the virologists and bacteriologists out there have been quite easily FOOLED, and why it's so hard to now convince them of such.
Is this your favorite "flaw" you wish to do a deep-dive on?
So you're now on record stating the establishment medical academics have Better arguments and evidence. Perhaps you'd prefer we dissect this irrational belief system flaw of yours? I can assure you, the exact opposite is the truth. Myself and thousands of others earnestly looked for these "better arguments and evidence" for well over a year. We couldn't find a shred of it. Not even a single point we could give them credit for. All we found were lies, deceptions and brainwashees blindly believing authorities.
Your thinking is backwards and this is perhaps the biggest hurdle we have to overcome. Do you believe Unicorns exist? If not, then you "deny they exist" which implies you're at fault, you're the "bad guy", you're the "denier". You cast aspersions in the wrong direction with this line of reasoning.
Further, your sentence IMPLICITLY ASSERTS the existence of such a thing known as a "Communicable Dis-ease". To assert that which has yet to be scientifically proven is what you've done in several of your points thus far. You've got the cart ahead of the horse. You're miles downstream from the lies and deceptions.
And yet again, asserting what is unproven. You're a blind believer in the authoritative narrative. The only "We" in your sentence are the blind believers. Considering this is a dialogue between two people, this is a remarkably IGNORANT and ARROGANT statement to make as the only "we" in this context is you and I. And I can assure you, I have not seen a shred of scientific evidence demonstrating there is such a THING as "Covid (SARS-CoV2)". But you go one step further downstream in your false claim. Not only do you assert there is such a "thing", but you go one step further and also falsely claim this "thing" is a "bioweapon". All without a shred of actual proof.
Do you see how you're failing to make your points on all counts? Is this the "flaw in my theory" you wish to do a deep dive on? You've got to pick only one as it's obviously going to take a great deal of time and effort to deconstruct the myriad of FALSE BELIEFS you hold in your mind as "truths".
Damn straight it is. But you aren't interested in understanding this. Because you assert again and again and again that I can't possibly achieve this. Your mind is closed. You've clearly demonstrated this with every statement you make. After all "we know Covid is an engineered bioweapon", right?
Amidst the myriad of logical fallacies you are trying to wield against me, this is yet another; the "reverse proof of claim logical fallacy". There's a maxim of law that states: "He who makes the claim bears the burden of proof". And in all we're discussing, the CLAIMANT is undeniably our trillion-dollar medical establishment cabal. So is this the "flaw" you wish to investigate? That you believe the establishment can support their claim that viruses exist or bacteria are pathogenic?
LOL. You've got everything backwards yet again. The problem we're going to have here is that you don't realize that what you have accepted as "evidence" of your BELIEFS is anything but. It's going to be a long unwind to demonstrate because it's clear you aren't yet ready to accept the possibility that you've been *FOOLED yet. This you make clear again and again.
You'd think after all we've been through the past 3 years, you'd be open to what I say and doing some investigation of your own. But nope, you're actually trapped in this space where they only pulled off the great Covid lie recently. That it took them over a hundred years to pull off this lie you are entirely unwilling to accept as a possibility. In your mind, it's simply IMPOSSIBLE that this is the case. This is what you think -> "there's no way they could have been lying to us all this time about "muh germs". This is your resounding stance. IMPOSSIBLE. You overtly admit to this again and again. There's just no way you could have been fooled, is there?
Who said it was? It is you that builds the strawman arguments. You're projecting all the time as well. By your name-calling and implications about what I've shared and my intentions, it is you that has injected "emotional thinking" into this discourse.
Not once did you say - "well, what you say is certainly interesting, what led you to these conclusions"? Not even once. All you've done this far is attack, attack and attack what I've said from a deeply EMOTIONAL state of FEAR.
Out of space...
Yet you have failed to show one instance where germ theory or viral pathology are incorrect, and your own theory has zero predictive power.
Ah, the old argument of "my opponent disagrees with me, therefore they're an idiot". Nice ad hominem. I've been in the Q space for at least 2 years now. So what? Seniority does not magically bestow legitimacy.
Asking for evidence and logic equals blind belief in authority.... right. Whatever you say.
But the idea that Covid is a bioweapon runs counter to the dominant medical establishment. So then I am not blindly believing authority, if I was I wouldn't be on GAW in the first place.
I never said you couldn't, I said you haven't. Not once have explained how emotional states or phobias trigger illnesses, you just assert that this is the case and expect me to believe you because you're anti establishment, which ironically is itself a call to blind belief in authority.
Being a multi-trillion dollar industry is neither a crime nor a flaw. If so, then the scam artists who push flat earth, NESARA, and germ theory are guilty of the exact same thing on a smaller scale.
You are pushing the claim that the evidence for germ theory is bunk. That's YOUR claim, which means YOU have to defend it.
I am open to those who make reasonable arguments and put forward evidence, you have done neither. I'm still waiting for which strain of Hepatitis excessive anger causes, and how the heck an emotional state causes an blood-borne pathogen/STD.
Pointing out potential problems and lack of evidence is a golden opportunity for you to explain how you arrived at your conclusions. Yet you have failed to do so; you have only doubled down on your assertions with no explanation and failed to address the contradictory evidence that I provided. Putting your theory under scrutiny is not an attack, it is how ideas are forged and refined. All theories should be subject to scrutiny, and if you view that as an attack, all it shows is that you are the one who is afraid of criticism.