Why are you here? To make us look like unhinged kooks like the flat-earthers and NESARA scammers do? To kill us off with bad medical advice? I can make random accusations too.
I'm here to spread wisdom and pointers to truth to like-minded people. You're clearly the one spreading 'bad medical advice" by continuously shilling for the establishment medical cartel. But obviously, you don't realize this which is the most frightening aspect of it all. As with the vast majority of our profoundly miseducated "doctors", you all actually think you're "doing the right thing" by spreading the BELIEFS you mistakenly accept as "truths". Because again, it's absolutely IMPOSSIBLE that you all could have been fooled, right?
My aim is to help people think critically about everything, and this includes analyzing evidence and arguments both for and against your current position.
Well if this is the case, it won't take us much time for you to see that I'm correct in my assertions. The fundamental problem you're going to have is coming to terms with the fact that what you accept as "evidence" is anything but.
Only looking at "evidence" that supports your pet theory is how flat earthers get to where they are.
Dude, you're suffering deeply from multiple CIA-psyop-brainwashing syndromes. Just stop now. You're embarrassing yourself. We've got too much to contend with already. You're a blind-believer-in-authority on steroids.
My aim is exact high standards for evidence and arguments so that this community doesn't get to that place, as it wastes time and turns newcomers off from our movement if they see that its members ignoring basic facts and logic.
You're the biggest "turn off" to "our movement" I've yet to encounter here, and I've been here since the beginning. So congratulations on winning that award. Can't you see you're 100% SHILLING FOR THE ESTABLISHMENT with every single point you try to make? If you can't see this you're in one heckuva quagmire that's going to be extremely tough for you to get out of. And frankly, you're a tremendous detriment to "our movement". Because "our movement" is going to deconstruct and decimate the entire establishment narrative which is built entirely on LIES AND DECEPTIONS. And there are no exceptions. The FOUNDATION of every major institution wielding power and control over us is lies, lies and more lies. A fact you are clearly not yet ready to consider.
You have provided neither evidence nor rational arguments for your position.
And for the zillionth time, you've got everything backwards. I look forward to your choice in dissecting the biggest "flaw" in "my theory" you choose. If you stay the course, you're going to learn the hard way that all the EVIDENCE supports what I've said and what you've BLINDLY BELIEVED TO BE EVIDENCE is the repository of lies you're presently unwilling to accept as a possibility.
You randomly associate various phobias to random diseases with no rhyme, reason, or explanation
Let's deconstruct your sentence. Nothing I said was RANDOM, I can assure you of that. But you didn't bother to ask me how I arrived at any of these assertions. Like a child, you flung out a barrage of "why, why why's" but you didn't really want the answer. You only wanted to make your point that I was an idiot at best, a harmful spreader of lies at worst.
various phobias
I never used the word "phobia". That's your word and your clearly incorrect INTERPRETATION of what I said. You didn't bother to seek clarification on any of it. You were solely focused on jumping to your irrational conclusions that I'm here to spread lies and harm my fellow anons. The very thing that you're doing but completely unaware of. This is PROJECTION
claim that all diseases boil down to mind games
"Mind GAMES". Another phrase I never used, therefore another attempt on your part to frame what I said as IDIOTIC AND HARMFUL. With each sentence you write, your intentions GLOW more and more. You're an unwitting establishment shill who's far too smart to have been fooled. Further, you're not interested in learning anything that doesn't match up with the establishment narrative. You've already got everything figured out, despite a complete and utter lack of ACTUAL EVIDENCE to support your unfounded position.
claim that cancer tissues are temporary and beneficial
This sentence is only partially accurate. You apparently didn't carefully read what I had to say on this topic however.
claim that viruses don't exist at all
You suffer from Steve-Kirsch-itis here. The CLAIMANT is the establishment. There claim is that muh-unicorn-viruses exist. My CLAIM is there is no evidence supporting THEIR CLAIM. Can you see the difference or do not understand the logical fallacy you invoke?
claim that the human body creates bacteria
True. Can you disprove this claim?
and claim that TB has a less than 1% mortality rate
I made no such claim. It appears you have a reading and comprehension problem and love to frame things in your own little special way so as to make yourself feel superior. You'll have to re-read that section again and see if you can correctly understand what I said.
All of this without any supporting evidence
None was requested by you. Not that you'd be able to assimilate it. Your fundamental problem is that you are quite MISTAKINGLY accepting **NON-EVIDENCE" as ACTUAL EVIDENCE. This is your core weakness.
and when opposing evidence is presented you kick and scream that it's not true because it comes from people you don't like and it contradicts your position.
You're closing strong with more PROJECTION. Well done! Can you agree that you only BELIEVE you supplied some "Opposing evidence"? Are you citing your "National Academy of Sciences" and "Smithsonian Mag" articles are evidence? Do you wish to stand on these articles are your irrefutable and unimpeachable sources of "EVIDENCE" that you are basing all your BELIEFS upon? Is this the hill you want to stand on?
The opposite is happening now. You've reversed out roles. It is you that is "kicking and screaming" because you're so bloody sure that your establishment sources of **PSEUDO-EVIDENCE"" are facts. And your incessant attacks against me are because you're clearly not ready to accept the fact that you've been fooled. This is the core problem. You're BLINDLY accepting, quite literally, WORDS being SAID by establishment authorities.
This is not the mindset of a rational adult or truth-seeker, this is the mindset of an irrational child.
How could you not close out your rant with your greatest insult yet? I would have expected nothing less from you.
As the child that you've thusly made me out to be, I hold out the olive branch and offer to walk you through how you've been fooled on one of the above major "flaws" you perceive in my position. Is your pride too strong to accept this possibility that you might be horribly wrong? I suspect it might be. But let's find out.
I'm offering to walk you through one of the dozens of lies you accept as truths with the hope that once you realize you've been fooled, you'll learn to "question everything" and accept nothing at face value any longer. And from that point on, you'll be able to do your own research, stop outsourcing your intellectual sovereignty to the authorities, and arrive at your own, evidence-based, well-reasoned and logical conclusions - despite the orthodox majority opinion. You'll be liberated from the lies henceforth.
So pick the one you're most sure you are right about; Viruses? Bacteria? Germ theory? Cancer? Conflict shocks? TB? Dis-ease causation?
I'll show you all the NON-EVIDENCE you've wrongly accepted and all the ACTUAL EVIDENCE that you presently choose to reject with the waive of your hand.
I'm here to spread wisdom and pointers to truth to like-minded people.
It's not wisdom if it contradicts reality.
Well if this is the case, it won't take us much time for you to see that I'm correct in my assertions.
Nope, because you still haven't explained why emotional states cause cancer, and you still haven't provided any evidence for your beliefs.
Nothing I said was RANDOM, I can assure you of that.
Lets review:
If she felt she becomes scared of what will happen to her, she gets bronchitis, whooping cough, throat/larynx issues. If she then has an existential/abandonment crisis on top of the the scare conflict, in time she gets pneumonia - water retention in the lungs. If she feels she can't earn a living to care for her children, she gets a starvation conflict which causes liver cancer. If she fears her husband will take the kids, she has a separation conflict and gets ductal breast cancer. If she becomes angry, she gets hepatitis. If she becomes extremely angry, she gets stomach cancer. If it turns out her husband was actually having a homosexual affair and perceives this as a "dirty conflict" and gets bladder or colon cancer. If she decides to retaliate and get revenge through a brutal fight over the property and money she gets pancreatic cancer.
Fear = bronchitis, existantial crisis = pneumonia, starvation confilict = liver cancer, separation anxiety = breast cancer, anger = hepatitis or stomach cancer (which have no relationship with each other), retaliation = pancreatic cancer. This is called randomly assigning various conditions to various emotional states or stressors. Ironically over half the conditions you listed involve neither bacteria nor viruses, so even if you were right it still wouldn't disprove germ theory.
Bonus question: Is a woman's period caused by a fear of pregnancy or fear of sexual intimacy?
True. Can you disprove this claim?
Nope, not how this works. YOU assert that the body manufactures bacteria, it's YOUR job to prove it.
I made no such claim. [That TB has a less than 1% mortality rate]
Earlier:
99% of the time, there's nothing "lethal" about this perfectly natural process. [TB]
If TB isn't lethal 99% of the time, then it's mortality rate is 1%. That's how percentages work. Or is math an establishment concoction too?
Continuing...
I'm here to spread wisdom and pointers to truth to like-minded people. You're clearly the one spreading 'bad medical advice" by continuously shilling for the establishment medical cartel. But obviously, you don't realize this which is the most frightening aspect of it all. As with the vast majority of our profoundly miseducated "doctors", you all actually think you're "doing the right thing" by spreading the BELIEFS you mistakenly accept as "truths". Because again, it's absolutely IMPOSSIBLE that you all could have been fooled, right?
Well if this is the case, it won't take us much time for you to see that I'm correct in my assertions. The fundamental problem you're going to have is coming to terms with the fact that what you accept as "evidence" is anything but.
Dude, you're suffering deeply from multiple CIA-psyop-brainwashing syndromes. Just stop now. You're embarrassing yourself. We've got too much to contend with already. You're a blind-believer-in-authority on steroids.
You're the biggest "turn off" to "our movement" I've yet to encounter here, and I've been here since the beginning. So congratulations on winning that award. Can't you see you're 100% SHILLING FOR THE ESTABLISHMENT with every single point you try to make? If you can't see this you're in one heckuva quagmire that's going to be extremely tough for you to get out of. And frankly, you're a tremendous detriment to "our movement". Because "our movement" is going to deconstruct and decimate the entire establishment narrative which is built entirely on LIES AND DECEPTIONS. And there are no exceptions. The FOUNDATION of every major institution wielding power and control over us is lies, lies and more lies. A fact you are clearly not yet ready to consider.
And for the zillionth time, you've got everything backwards. I look forward to your choice in dissecting the biggest "flaw" in "my theory" you choose. If you stay the course, you're going to learn the hard way that all the EVIDENCE supports what I've said and what you've BLINDLY BELIEVED TO BE EVIDENCE is the repository of lies you're presently unwilling to accept as a possibility.
Let's deconstruct your sentence. Nothing I said was RANDOM, I can assure you of that. But you didn't bother to ask me how I arrived at any of these assertions. Like a child, you flung out a barrage of "why, why why's" but you didn't really want the answer. You only wanted to make your point that I was an idiot at best, a harmful spreader of lies at worst.
I never used the word "phobia". That's your word and your clearly incorrect INTERPRETATION of what I said. You didn't bother to seek clarification on any of it. You were solely focused on jumping to your irrational conclusions that I'm here to spread lies and harm my fellow anons. The very thing that you're doing but completely unaware of. This is PROJECTION
"Mind GAMES". Another phrase I never used, therefore another attempt on your part to frame what I said as IDIOTIC AND HARMFUL. With each sentence you write, your intentions GLOW more and more. You're an unwitting establishment shill who's far too smart to have been fooled. Further, you're not interested in learning anything that doesn't match up with the establishment narrative. You've already got everything figured out, despite a complete and utter lack of ACTUAL EVIDENCE to support your unfounded position.
This sentence is only partially accurate. You apparently didn't carefully read what I had to say on this topic however.
You suffer from Steve-Kirsch-itis here. The CLAIMANT is the establishment. There claim is that muh-unicorn-viruses exist. My CLAIM is there is no evidence supporting THEIR CLAIM. Can you see the difference or do not understand the logical fallacy you invoke?
True. Can you disprove this claim?
I made no such claim. It appears you have a reading and comprehension problem and love to frame things in your own little special way so as to make yourself feel superior. You'll have to re-read that section again and see if you can correctly understand what I said.
None was requested by you. Not that you'd be able to assimilate it. Your fundamental problem is that you are quite MISTAKINGLY accepting **NON-EVIDENCE" as ACTUAL EVIDENCE. This is your core weakness.
You're closing strong with more PROJECTION. Well done! Can you agree that you only BELIEVE you supplied some "Opposing evidence"? Are you citing your "National Academy of Sciences" and "Smithsonian Mag" articles are evidence? Do you wish to stand on these articles are your irrefutable and unimpeachable sources of "EVIDENCE" that you are basing all your BELIEFS upon? Is this the hill you want to stand on?
The opposite is happening now. You've reversed out roles. It is you that is "kicking and screaming" because you're so bloody sure that your establishment sources of **PSEUDO-EVIDENCE"" are facts. And your incessant attacks against me are because you're clearly not ready to accept the fact that you've been fooled. This is the core problem. You're BLINDLY accepting, quite literally, WORDS being SAID by establishment authorities.
How could you not close out your rant with your greatest insult yet? I would have expected nothing less from you.
As the child that you've thusly made me out to be, I hold out the olive branch and offer to walk you through how you've been fooled on one of the above major "flaws" you perceive in my position. Is your pride too strong to accept this possibility that you might be horribly wrong? I suspect it might be. But let's find out.
I'm offering to walk you through one of the dozens of lies you accept as truths with the hope that once you realize you've been fooled, you'll learn to "question everything" and accept nothing at face value any longer. And from that point on, you'll be able to do your own research, stop outsourcing your intellectual sovereignty to the authorities, and arrive at your own, evidence-based, well-reasoned and logical conclusions - despite the orthodox majority opinion. You'll be liberated from the lies henceforth.
So pick the one you're most sure you are right about; Viruses? Bacteria? Germ theory? Cancer? Conflict shocks? TB? Dis-ease causation?
I'll show you all the NON-EVIDENCE you've wrongly accepted and all the ACTUAL EVIDENCE that you presently choose to reject with the waive of your hand.
Are you up for the challenge?
It's not wisdom if it contradicts reality.
Nope, because you still haven't explained why emotional states cause cancer, and you still haven't provided any evidence for your beliefs.
Lets review:
Fear = bronchitis, existantial crisis = pneumonia, starvation confilict = liver cancer, separation anxiety = breast cancer, anger = hepatitis or stomach cancer (which have no relationship with each other), retaliation = pancreatic cancer. This is called randomly assigning various conditions to various emotional states or stressors. Ironically over half the conditions you listed involve neither bacteria nor viruses, so even if you were right it still wouldn't disprove germ theory.
Bonus question: Is a woman's period caused by a fear of pregnancy or fear of sexual intimacy?
Nope, not how this works. YOU assert that the body manufactures bacteria, it's YOUR job to prove it.
Earlier:
If TB isn't lethal 99% of the time, then it's mortality rate is 1%. That's how percentages work. Or is math an establishment concoction too?