Hopefully he will have his feet held to the fire and will not veto this. The OK for "fiduciaries to consider climate change and other environmental, social, and governance factors when they make investment decisions and when they exercise shareholder rights", should NOT be a factor in decision making.
Legislation (ergo, policy making) has to have the approval of Congress. Congress allows many policies/rules to be made by State Department agencies providing it follows a set of requirements. One of these is to open a public commentary to the proposed rule/policy. However, Congress has final say on any policy they deem important enough for them to take up. This is one of them. It was rejected.
This means the resident in office doesn't have any standing on the issue. A veto isn't possible for legislation rejected (vetoed) by Congress. Biden can't veto something already vetoed. The Executive branch does not make law or policy without the consent of Congress.
Let me get this straight. The Biden regime adds a rule allowing ESG. The legislative branch (policy/law making branch) rejects the Biden regime policy/rule/law. This ought to be the end of the story.
Legislation (ergo, law/rule/policy) has to have the approval of Congress. Congress allows many policies to be made by State Department agencies providing it follows a set of requirements. One of these is to open a public commentary to the proposed rule/policy. However, Congress has final say on any policy they deem important enough for them to take up. This is one of them. It was rejected.
This means the resident in office doesn't have any standing on the issue. A veto isn't possible for legislation rejected by Congress. A legislative veto cannot be vetoed by Biden. It makes no sense. The Executive branch does not make law or policy without the consent of Congress.
Unless they have enough votes to override a veto. Which is 2/3rds of the Senate (67 votes). Then yes. All bills passed by the house and senate have to be signed by the President unless they have 2/3rds.
It's being reported he's up for reelection. Fine. I'll take the vote. Albeit, I recall there was some real *ckery going on in Montana that got him elected. Way down in the polls, yet it was another one of those 'miraculous' democrat wins. Go figure.
ABC News: Biden poised for 1st presidential veto in newly divided Congress
https://abcnews.go.com/amp/Politics/biden-poised-1st-presidential-veto-newly-divided-congress/story?id=97564310
Fox News: Senate kills Biden ESG investment rule in stunning rebuke
https://news.yahoo.com/senate-kills-biden-esg-investment-215425800.html
Hopefully he will have his feet held to the fire and will not veto this. The OK for "fiduciaries to consider climate change and other environmental, social, and governance factors when they make investment decisions and when they exercise shareholder rights", should NOT be a factor in decision making.
What happens next if he does veto it?
Declass COVID origins
Seems there's a memo in this situation somewhere like perhaps:
Biden: I will VETO this!
Congress: You can't VETO our VETO!!
Legislation (ergo, policy making) has to have the approval of Congress. Congress allows many policies/rules to be made by State Department agencies providing it follows a set of requirements. One of these is to open a public commentary to the proposed rule/policy. However, Congress has final say on any policy they deem important enough for them to take up. This is one of them. It was rejected.
This means the resident in office doesn't have any standing on the issue. A veto isn't possible for legislation rejected (vetoed) by Congress. Biden can't veto something already vetoed. The Executive branch does not make law or policy without the consent of Congress.
Hear! Hear!!
How can Biden veto something that doesn’t make it to his desk?
Exactly
Good point.
Yay. Anyone who has 401K should be thrill.
Wow, KJP's response...really the pot calling the kettle black.
Let me get this straight. The Biden regime adds a rule allowing ESG. The legislative branch (policy/law making branch) rejects the Biden regime policy/rule/law. This ought to be the end of the story.
Legislation (ergo, law/rule/policy) has to have the approval of Congress. Congress allows many policies to be made by State Department agencies providing it follows a set of requirements. One of these is to open a public commentary to the proposed rule/policy. However, Congress has final say on any policy they deem important enough for them to take up. This is one of them. It was rejected.
This means the resident in office doesn't have any standing on the issue. A veto isn't possible for legislation rejected by Congress. A legislative veto cannot be vetoed by Biden. It makes no sense. The Executive branch does not make law or policy without the consent of Congress.
This avalanche has been stopped - Great!
For now...
Biden still has to sign it.
Does he?
Unless they have enough votes to override a veto. Which is 2/3rds of the Senate (67 votes). Then yes. All bills passed by the house and senate have to be signed by the President unless they have 2/3rds.
Boom Boom Manchin and Tester only two Dems to vote yea
What does any of that mean?
The article in my comment might help your understanding.
https://greatawakening.win/p/16aTCZJbss/x/c/4TrHkaUdO6w
ESG has been discussed on GAW before:
https://greatawakening.win/search?params=ESG&community=GreatAwakening
50-46 is interesting. Was it Manchin and Sinema who defected?
Manchin voted Yea. Sinema voted Nay.
https://www.senate.gov/legislative/LIS/roll_call_votes/vote1181/vote_118_1_00035.htm
We have a new name folks. Would be fun to watch what else he does in this Movie.
It's being reported he's up for reelection. Fine. I'll take the vote. Albeit, I recall there was some real *ckery going on in Montana that got him elected. Way down in the polls, yet it was another one of those 'miraculous' democrat wins. Go figure.
I love the ways God works! He works for ultimate good.
Biden will veto it. His handlers will see to it. The optics are bad for him though.