I know some very smart normies and conservatives who would rather be persuaded to join the circus than read Q posts. They have mental road blocks, such as the fear of judgement by their spouses or peers.
So that's the challenge. I want to develop a strategy for cracking the toughest cookies. I don't mean dogmatic libs; they're lost for now. I mean someone who is rational and respects you enough to allow a 20 minute sales pitch but will only give you one shot.
So it would have to be a simple and strong argument or proof, yet still within the city limits of Normietown. This means no Angela Hitler, no locking up Obama and Hillary in Gitmo, no Satanic pedos.
I'm thinking I would start by explaining that Q is a propaganda campaign by Military Intelligence to undermine the criminality of the Clintons, Obama, and the deep state. I think many normies can accept that. Then I'd move on to some juicy FISA gate posts. Or a personal favorite: Blunt and Direct Time. The Lord's Prayer is also a good one.
Let me know your ideas on which normie-friendly proofs or arguments you think are the strongest to start with.
Libtard buddy of mine says he'll never believe in the deep state because he doesn't think criminals could cooperate enough to organize into a single unit and would always end up fighting each other instead.
What does he think happened to the Mafia? Did they disappear or could they have found that government is the most profitable endeavor?
That's why he's a libtard
Yes! For him its just a belief and he chooses not to believe in the deep state with that NPR air of intelligence and superiority over ''conspiracy '' believers.
that's what they want you to think lol